Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

  1. Welcome to GM Inside News Forum – General discussion forum for GM

    Welcome to GM Inside News Forum - a website dedicated to all things GM.

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join GM Inside News Forum today!
     
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

  1. #1
    GMI Staff Writer
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    543
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 104 Times in 62 Posts

    Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?


    Direct injection offers numerous benefits over port fuel delivery but could it be a bigger headache than it’s worth?

    The automotive industry has gradually switched to direct injection over the past decade or so and for good reason. Spraying a precisely controlled amount of fuel right into an engine’s combustion chambers can result in improved efficiency and greater power density; tailpipe emissions are generally cleaner as well.

    In spite of these advantages, this technology isn’t perfect. DI has a handful of downsides including additional noise, particularly at idle and dramatically higher costs, though there are other concerns.

    And a big one has to do with carbon deposits. We’ve heard rumblings that blackened buildup on the backsides of intake valves is a major problem and something that could be disastrous for motorists in the coming years. To get to the bottom of this potential top-end issue we did some digging.

    What’s Really Going On?

    Ford has been pushing its EcoBoost engines as a way of improving fuel economy without sacrificing performance. The real-world results of this strategy may be mixed, but one thing is not: all of these powerplants feature direct injection as well as turbochargers and advanced control software.

    These engines have been on the market for a number of years now and to get some empirical evidence from the front lines about how they’re holding up we reached out to Brian Laskowski, a Ford Factory Certified Technician. He also has a YouTube channel, FordTechMakuloco that highlights all sorts of automotive repairs.

    Responding via e-mail Laskowski said, “Carbon deposits in Ford engines are not a widespread issue due to the advanced engine technology.” But he also mentioned that it has happened in some low-mileage EcoBoost units.

    “As of today the issue seems to be isolated to certain markets with varying factors such as fuel quality,” said Laskowski. If carbon buildup becomes severe he said it can result in all kinds of issues from drivability woes to misfires, turbocharger issues and even catalytic converter damage.

    Survey Says…

    Assuaging potential sky-is-falling fears, Michael Karesh, the developer of TrueDelta.com said carbon buildup is “not an issue for all direct-injected engines” based on the data he collects. His website surveys nearly 100,000 drivers of all makes and models to acquire relevant and timely data about vehicle reliability and fuel economy among other things.

    But of course there are some instances of deposit-related issues that have popped up. Karesh said, “The only engines it’s reported quite a bit is [with] the VW/Audi 2.0T and then the Audi V6s.” He also said, “I know there are some BMWs that end up with carbon buildup as well.”

    As for the frequency of reported problems with these Volkswagen cars he said his numbers indicate “it can be as high as one in six over the last two years,” which “is a high number” and one that he said is consistent across different models.

    The 2008 Audi A3, which offered a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine, also popped up in the TrueDelta data. Karesh said it’s puzzling why 2006 and 2007 models aren’t having similar carbon issues. Leaving us with more questions he said, “I’m not really seeing GTIs [popup],” which are mechanically similar to the A3.

    “If there is a non-German car there might be something happening in the [Cadillac] CTS,” said Karesh, but once again he cautioned that it’s “too scattered and sporadic” to draw any definitive conclusions. Additionally he said, “I have one report of decarbonizing the engine in a Chevrolet Equinox.” Unlike the other instances, he has quite a large sample size for this particular vehicle, which clearly indicates that deposits are not a major problem at this time ...
    For all the details on this story, Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct-Injection Engines? please visit AutoGuide.com.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    7.0 Liter LS7 V8 LetsRace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    4,600
    Thanks
    1,090
    Thanked 1,058 Times in 982 Posts

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    The harder you drive a direct injection vehicle the better it will be. That's why the GTI doesn't present the problem as much as the A3. Customers of the GTI are more likely to drive their cars hard.
    "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit."
    - Aristotle

  4. #3
    5.3 Liter Vortec V8 newdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Some place...
    Posts
    1,467
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 201 Times in 108 Posts
    My Ride
    2012 Silverado 1500 Z71

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    Sure is a problem. 2.4 Ecotec, 3.6 High feature, and even the all new Ecotec3 engine family. Our shop just put a 5.3 Ecotec3 back together the other day (collapsed AFM lifter on cyl. 4) with 21600 miles. The intake ports on the non AFM cylinders were almost as bad as the AFM cylinders. It ridiculous how much carbon was on those valves. The pistons were quite dirty as well. Oil residue from the PCV at the top of the intake ports as well.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Nova Omega Ventura Apollo gets you NOVA, genius isn't it?

    Occupy Wall Streeters should go occupy their homes...or a job...

  5. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC 07SIERRA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    435
    Thanks
    130
    Thanked 192 Times in 111 Posts
    My Ride
    2016 Ruby Red Fusion Titanium

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    Quote Originally Posted by newdude View Post
    Sure is a problem. 2.4 Ecotec, 3.6 High feature, and even the all new Ecotec3 engine family. Our shop just put a 5.3 Ecotec3 back together the other day (collapsed AFM lifter on cyl. 4) with 21600 miles. The intake ports on the non AFM cylinders were almost as bad as the AFM cylinders. It ridiculous how much carbon was on those valves. The pistons were quite dirty as well. Oil residue from the PCV at the top of the intake ports as well.
    A new afm engine with carbon and oil residue issues, who would of thought... Your old Afm engines were horrible for it, I can see the new ones following the trend

  7. #5
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    13,578
    Thanks
    542
    Thanked 870 Times in 624 Posts

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    This was discussed at length within the last few months on GMI. One of the posters is an expert on the issue, and posted several important facts and observations, so it might be worthwhile to review that thread.
    Port fuel injection cleans the intake valves, while DI engines can have exhaust gas re circulation deposits build up on intake valves.
    The german engines seem to be the worst, but unless there is some gasoline port injection cleaning the intake valves, there will be deposits.
    Apparently (some?) toyota engines use a combination of port and direct injection, cleaning the intake valves, and eliminating or greatly reducing the problem.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Dr.Show-Me For This Useful Post:

    Neanderthal (01-16-2015)

  9. #6
    R2-D2 Astromech Droid Premium Member Neanderthal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    A sunny cave in Transylvania
    Posts
    35,296
    Thanks
    9,774
    Thanked 8,002 Times in 4,805 Posts
    My Ride
    17 Soul&/01 PT LTD/15 JD130

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    ^^Thanks, Doctor. I was going to mention that.

    https://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/f...ection-118752/
    2017 Soul &, Titanium

    Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.--Unattributed

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."--Benjamin Franklin

    "The freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter."--George Washington

    Hidden Content

  10. #7
    2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    Quote Originally Posted by LetsRace View Post
    The harder you drive a direct injection vehicle the better it will be. That's why the GTI doesn't present the problem as much as the A3. Customers of the GTI are more likely to drive their cars hard.
    How does driving harder have any material impact on oil vapors depositing onto valves?

  11. #8
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 Premium Member jzchev28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Toledo, OH
    Posts
    5,453
    Thanks
    7,342
    Thanked 2,447 Times in 1,253 Posts
    My Ride
    2014 Silverado LTZ 6.2L

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    Quote Originally Posted by mileageman View Post
    How does driving harder have any material impact on oil vapors depositing onto valves?
    Well i don't know if his theory is right or not but driving harder increases combustion temperatures.

  12. #9
    R2-D2 Astromech Droid Premium Member Neanderthal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    A sunny cave in Transylvania
    Posts
    35,296
    Thanks
    9,774
    Thanked 8,002 Times in 4,805 Posts
    My Ride
    17 Soul&/01 PT LTD/15 JD130

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    Quote Originally Posted by mileageman View Post
    How does driving harder have any material impact on oil vapors depositing onto valves?
    Known in some circles as the "Italian tuneup," it's known that running the **** out of your car from time to time helps blow the carbon out.

    I used to take my parents' cars out, they had a cherry 79 Caddy and a 71 225 among others, and run hell out of them. A number of blasts at WFO throttle and you'd see the crud pouring out of the tailpipe. They were typical town drivers, probably never got over 2500 RPM and those cars just piddled around town most of their lives.

    Machines need to be run hard from time to time. Like the human body.
    2017 Soul &, Titanium

    Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.--Unattributed

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."--Benjamin Franklin

    "The freedom of Speech may be taken away, and, dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter."--George Washington

    Hidden Content

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Neanderthal For This Useful Post:

    ChrisGinNC (01-17-2015)

  14. #10
    3.6 Liter SIDI V6 ogg vorbis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, ON
    Posts
    1,075
    Thanks
    15
    Thanked 41 Times in 31 Posts
    My Ride
    2015 Cadillac ATS 2.0T

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    There are dozens of technical papers written about the problems of DI. Companies go from a mediocre combustion system to a good one, and then claim it's because of DI. DI causes WORSE engine-out emissions, and needs a strategy to heat the cat faster. DI causes more soot from stratified charge combustion. It will require soot traps in the next couple of years. So in addition to the initial expense, now we'll have to pay for more emissions controls. Fuel is injected while the intake valves are open; the 7% improved VE is BS. As far as I can tell, OEMs save a little time and money from not doing a proper valve job. It has loud injectors, a mechanical fuel pump that robs HP, and is harder to fix. imo it's totally not worth it.

  15. #11
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) F14CRAZY's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    11,898
    Thanks
    263
    Thanked 845 Times in 468 Posts

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    Put some Sea Foam though the intake once in a while?
    '07 Subaru Forester 2.5X 5MT. Bought new. 197k miles. '05 Dodge Durango Limited Hemi AWD. Mom bought new. 102k miles. '74 Buick LeSabre Luxus convertible. 455-4/7.5L. '89 Buick Reatta. 3800 SII L67/F40 six speed swap to be completed someday. Wife's: '07 Subaru Forester XT. World Rally Blue Mica.

    '87 BMW K75c. '87 Kawasaki 650SX. '85 Bayliner Capri 1952. '71 Chris Craft Coho 33'. '70? Amphicat 6x6 AATV.

  16. #12
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one) Premium Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    The land of the hethan
    Posts
    11,190
    Thanks
    1,535
    Thanked 4,141 Times in 2,646 Posts
    My Ride
    The coffin on wheels

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    The article answered its own question, carbon build up is not a widespread problem in DI engines.

  17. #13
    2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    Quote Originally Posted by jpd80 View Post
    The article answered its own question, carbon build up is not a widespread problem in DI engines.
    The article said nothing of the sort. It said that Michael Karesh, with his *extremely* limited dataset on truedelta, does not see *all* DI engines showing problems. That is a far cry from saying that carbon buildup is not a widespread problem. I have personally seen several dozen DI engines from at least 3 different manufacturers have major coking on the valves. With my limited dataset does that mean that *all* DI engines have carbon buildup problems?

    The coking problems will end when PCV systems improve, or if port injectors are added in addition to direct injectors. I have actually wondered if throttle body injection would work to address this problem. A single TBI is a lot easier than adding 4/6/8 additional port injectors.

  18. #14
    Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    13,578
    Thanks
    542
    Thanked 870 Times in 624 Posts

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    I
    Quote Originally Posted by mileageman View Post
    The coking problems will end when PCV systems improve, or if port injectors are added in addition to direct injectors. I have actually wondered if throttle body injection would work to address this problem. A single TBI is a lot easier than adding 4/6/8 additional port injectors.
    On DI engines, the fuel is injected when the valves are closed, at some 2,000+ psi. If the valves were open, there Would be Blowback, but my understanding is that the valves ARE closed, meaning the only things In the intake tract are incoming air and Re-circulated exhaust gas, creating the problem of carbon buildup.
    With port fuel injection, the exhaust gas re circulation is occurs BUT the incoming air also includes gasoline, a very strong solvent that "Clean" the intake valves on the backside.
    Anything in the gasoline would be injected into the combustion chamber, missing the intake valve stems, and an Italian tuneup would be Ineffective as well.
    IMO fixing the problem is essential to avoid giving DI engines a bad reputation, and they better do it quickly!

  19. #15
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Savannah
    Posts
    6,718
    Thanks
    302
    Thanked 819 Times in 576 Posts

    Re: Is Carbon Buildup a Problem With Direct Injection Engines?

    I have taken apart a few of the LNF engines and haven't seen significant issues at all. I would think that with FI velocities past the intake valve might be higher and do a little self cleaning? Which would support the Ford EB talk. Low mileage engines and engines that don't run under boost often might be more susceptible to it.

  20. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2