IMHO it's a flawed comparison test because they used the 4 Gran Coupe. That made no sense to me.
That said, C Class please. I just can't get past the XE's interior.
XE is for me. I prefer the jaguar.
Funny how they complain about the Jag's bland styling on China AND the USA!
Of the Jag and Merc I myself would pick the Jag just because the Mercedes doesn't look good from most angles, flat out awkward sometimes. To me part of luxury is no-compromise style, the Merc's style is compromised.
And I hadn't realized the Merc has a column shift. I supposed for some on GMI that will be the hallmark of saying "I'm luxury" and should applaud Mercedes for being true to its roots. Yet GM does it on the Escalade and it is tacky.
'Angry' headlights? Check. Amorphous grille shapes? Check. 3-port lower fascias with huge gaping outer holes? Check. 5-spoke rims? Check. Unimaginative LED treatments? Check. Sigh? Check.
BMW gets older & older looking as other brands move stylistically forward. Oh; not these other two, but some.
The C looks like an overstyled Japanese creation.
My blog: Hidden Content
C-Class for me. It's comfortable and refined yet not sloppy. Plus that interior. I don't personally have a use for a serious "sport" sedan, but rather a luxury sedan that's competent overall.
So you are saying negative things about GM and calling a competitor better on a GM site, and you call me a troll? I think after over 7,000 posts I deserve better than that.
It's cheap, it's chintzy, and it doesn't belong in there. The Mercedes one isn't exactly fantastic, but it certainly is better and easier on the eyes as well. It also doesn't move like the Escalade one. You just bump it up and down to change gears. The Escalade one physically moves like the one in the Silverado I posted, as it's the same shifter and uses the same parts, hence the cheap, low rent appearance. Again, out of place in a car of that caliber.
Sorry, that post came across as trolling to me. Nothing personal dude, chill. You brought up the Escalade's column shift, which you know is a highly debated topic on here (), so expect something to flare up from that.
Oh, and I'm not sure if you had noticed or not, but this entire thread has nothing to do with GM at all. It's Jaguar vs. BMW vs. Mercedes-Benz. And comparing a something from compact sedan in this comparison test to a full size SUV? Come on. So dissing a GM product in a non-GM thread that you brought up got scrutinized.
MB's shifter certainly looks very cheap. Why is the 'window' in it so amorphously shaped, does anything show up in the left-hand 50% of it or is that lens taken from the parts bin of another model?
No doubt there are many who believe that MB shifter has NO PLACE being in a car of that price tier and marketed image.
However, this is GMI, and to me the purpose of "competition news" is to understand what competitors are doing (bad or well) and apply that to GM. And that applies to the column shifter in the Merc; the very fact one is on an MB product bears scrutiny and doesn't matter that the Merc and Escalade are in different segments. As far as I know this is the only other non-GM shifter out there on a luxury product, why not compare it?
Just my thoughts, and you are right this is a touch topic - it isn't worth turning this into a 10 page debate over something I always laugh at because I don't think it's a big deal (and neither do all the people who buy one).
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)