GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Front Page News > GMI Front Page Polls
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

View Poll Results: Which GM Product Needs Replaced ASAP?
Chevrolet Cobalt 116 32.77%
Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Canyon 107 30.23%
Chevrolet Impala 39 11.02%
Cadillac STS 21 5.93%
Pontiac G6 50 14.12%
Other, please explain!! 21 5.93%
Voters: 354. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-29-2008, 10:16 AM   #31 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
zete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 3,596
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

Quote:
Originally Posted by mgescuro View Post
There are "desperate" cars at nearly every brand.

Buick -- Lucerne, Lacrosse
Cadillac -- DTS, STS
Chevy -- Impala, Cobalt, Colorado
GMC -- Canyon
Pontiac -- G5, G6, Torrent
Saab -- 9-3, 9-5, 9-7
Yeah, what he said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsap View Post
I vote for the Cobalt without any doubt. The Cobalt is by no means a bad car (it is underrated!), but with high gas prices...GM could afford to have a new Cobalt out right now.

FYI: The all-new "world" Cobalt will appear mid-2009 as a 2010 model. GM initially planned a mid-cycle enhancement for the 2009 MY (to go with the new SS), but it was canceled as GM pushed up the all-new 2010 model.
And that's good news. I hadn't heard that. So they've pulled the new Cobalt forward just in time to take advantage of the price of fuel. GM seems to get it. Let's hope it's a trend.

I guess we'll see it in Detroit come January, then.
zete is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-29-2008, 11:16 AM   #32 (permalink)
ksr
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bridgeville, PA
Drives: 2004 CTS 1990 Firebird Formula
Posts: 1,414
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoomsDave View Post
  • STS - Here's our winner! Car is hopeless, as is. Interior is classic old-school GM mess. V8 is lame duck engine compared to the DI V6. Exterior is dated. Replacement is years away. For Cadiliac's flagship sedan, it's sad compared to the CTS. GM will sell dozens of these until the Zeta-based replacement shows up, sadly.


I like the STS, but you make some good points about it.

It may be just me, but I've been seeing a lot of them on the road recently. Big incentives?
__________________
Current rides: '04 Cadillac CTS
'90 Pontiac Firebird Formula (used)

Past rides: '02 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS
'90 Buick Reatta (used)
'98 Pontiac Trans Am convertible
'97 Saturn SC1
'96 Dodge Avenger ES
'95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34
'90 Pontiac Firebird Formula
'87 Chevrolet Cavalier RS
'86 Chevrolet Cavalier RS
ksr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 11:17 AM   #33 (permalink)
ksr
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bridgeville, PA
Drives: 2004 CTS 1990 Firebird Formula
Posts: 1,414
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butz View Post
All of them, but mostly the STS.. Not even a replacement is in sight!


How far away is the car that supposed to replace both STS and DTS?
__________________
Current rides: '04 Cadillac CTS
'90 Pontiac Firebird Formula (used)

Past rides: '02 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS
'90 Buick Reatta (used)
'98 Pontiac Trans Am convertible
'97 Saturn SC1
'96 Dodge Avenger ES
'95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo Z34
'90 Pontiac Firebird Formula
'87 Chevrolet Cavalier RS
'86 Chevrolet Cavalier RS
ksr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 12:00 PM   #34 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
91 s-10baja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kirkland, WA
Drives: 2004 Cadillac CTS 1991 Chevrolet S-10 Baja Editio
Posts: 3,910
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

a high mileage commuter. period.
__________________
http://www.northwestautosalon.com/

My Rides (2004 Cadillac CTS Lux/sprt, 1991 Chevrolet S-10 Baja):
http://flickr.com/photos/45118511@N00/
http://www.youtube.com/user/bajabusta
Quote:
"I know a lot about cars. I can look at a car's headlights and tell you exactly which way it's coming." - Mitch Hedberg ...
91 s-10baja is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 01:19 PM   #35 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
t-rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Drives: 1997 BMW 328i S
Posts: 5,337
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

I'd say the Chevy Equinox. Probably more than any other GM product, it's miserably failing to live up to its sales potential. A fresh new set of clothes, competent powertrain, and resized to CR-V/RAV4 dimensions, and Equinox sales would probably double.

Or replace it with an updated Captiva...
t-rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 01:23 PM   #36 (permalink)
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Drives: 2007 Cobalt SS 2.4 VVT
Posts: 35
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

The results of the poll reflect my thoughts exactly. In the face of rocketing gas prices, both the Cobalt/G5 and Colorado/Canyon will be instrumental in bringing about increased sales. Small cars will continue to be huge sellers and GM needs to show that they actually care about this segment to get a piece of the action. The current Cobalt is a great start, but it is time to forge on aggressively. The Cobalt should be priority with a strong replacement for the current model with the Colorado pulling in a close second. Some people just flat need a pickup and a strong, efficient Colorado could be just the ticket.
kovich14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 01:58 PM   #37 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
MaxLegroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newport News, VA
Drives: 2005 Toyota Prius 1996 Chrysler Sebring LX
Posts: 1,307
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

I didn't vote for the Cobalt because we know that it will be replaced soon. I considered the Impala in need of a replacement, or at least a major re-working. What that re-working should include is the latest powertrain, meaning the 3.6 and six speed, and a wheelbase stretch to increase rear legroom. It hardly has any more than the Malibu, and whenever I try sitting behind myself in one, my knees are always in the back of the front seat. Other than that, the changes the car needs are minor.
__________________
Donne e motori, gioie e dolori
MaxLegroom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 03:16 PM   #38 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
ctsmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 491
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

saab 9-5 without a doubt.
__________________
Current Cars:
2008 Chevrolet Corvette Manual, 99 Red Firebird Manual- Brother
2007 SAAB 9-3 2.0T- Me
2006 Cadillac STS 3.6- Mom
2008 Subaru WRX STI /1999 Black Pontiac Firebird- other Brother
2003 Cadillac Deville Northstar- Dad


Past Cars:
2004 Cadillac CTS 3.6- Me-----> SOLD
1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GT- Given to aunt
1994 GMC Safari- Sold
1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- Donated
ctsmo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 03:19 PM   #39 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
osv_alero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dundee, Oregon
Drives: 2006 HHR 2LT
Posts: 928
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

It was a hard pick between the Cobalt and the Colorado. With gas prices the way the are, each product has an excellent opportunity to make the turn around like the new Malibu.

Both products have been left to rot for WAY to long.
__________________
The U.S. trade deficit with China increases by $1 billion a day
The U.S. trade deficit for automobiles alone is $11 billion per month


http://americaneconomicalert.org/


For every one transplant job added in the US, nearly five jobs are eliminated
osv_alero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 03:30 PM   #40 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
likearock00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NC
Drives: 2006 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab Z-71
Posts: 7,874
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

Quote:
Originally Posted by rumble bee View Post
I say the colorado. The colorado xtreme is just like the s10 xtreme. Cheap tinny trucks that make you think you have a powerful motor under the hood when you don't. Hell, the 5 cylinder don't even make 300 horsepower! My HEMI gets 345 horse power and can smoke any colorado out there. Maybe GM needs to correct this problem before they slap an xtreme sticker on the side and call it a spor truck because it is not at the same level Rumble Bee, by any means
Welcome Troll. Your truck has 3 extra cylinders....I'd expect you to beat a 5. I look forward to more of your bright posts.

I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the Aveo yet. I agree, the Cobalt could stand for a redesign. I am happy to see the XFE edition out though- hopefully that'll keep sales going. I'd like to see the Aveo get a fresh start- something that is actually appealing to Americans.
__________________
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. -Thomas Jefferson
likearock00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2008, 04:05 PM   #41 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Drives: 1996 Cavalier Z24, 2000 Blazer LT
Posts: 1,426
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

Cobalt...imagine a new "Malibu-like" introduction with a new design Cobalt. You think Malibu's are selling well, with $4 gas likely here to stay, a new fuel sipper with looks will get LOTS of attention.
__________________
2000 Chevrolet Blazer LT -- 66000 miles
1996 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 -- 166000 miles

MEDIOCRITY: It takes a lot less time, and most people won't notice the difference until it's too late.
jfnz24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 12:58 AM   #42 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,726
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

I seriously feel that GM has much more to gain with a new Cobalt over a new anything else right now with a ton of sells to pick up.
63GrandSport001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 10:03 AM   #43 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
drew770's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central Florida
Drives: 2004 Chevy Trailblazer 2002 Acura TL 3.2 2006 N
Posts: 1,032
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

Cobalt has a greater need for gutting but the sad Colorado is a pretty close second. What's sad is GM is a truck expert and the Colorado is not a good representive of that fact.

Is the Colorado a turd? No, its just not very competitive.

Now the STS is just plain sad. For a semi-Flagship vehicle it is subpar. It has a tired interior, dated exterior and drives like an 80s buick.
The CTS can't shoulder all of Caddy's sales and goodwill alone. The future STS or DTS or Whatever the name will be should be a true Flagship with no shortcuts.
__________________
Don't forget CRACK IS WHACK!!!

Last edited by drew770 : 05-30-2008 at 10:14 AM.
drew770 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 12:51 PM   #44 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Drives: 07 HHR and a 96 Formula Convert
Posts: 664
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

I voted for the Canyon/Colorado. It's too bad GM couldnt keep the S-10 alive with continous improvements and have a small/mid/full size truck line becuase right now I bet S10 sales would be enjoying some good numbers!
GMC-70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2008, 01:29 PM   #45 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
M_RABID's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Drives: 2008 GMC Acadia SLT2
Posts: 245
Re: Most Desperate GM Product

Quote:
Originally Posted by montrealvue View Post
The Uplander and Montana SV6. Their death can't come soon enough and the Lambdas are not an appropriate substitution.
Yes they are.

The Colorado/Canyon needs to be replaced asap, but the LaCrosse should be GM's top priority.
The Invicta concept scheduled for Feb production can't come soon enough. This new vehicle has the most potential for improving GMs sales figures IMO.
__________________
Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you.

Last edited by M_RABID : 05-30-2008 at 01:32 PM.
M_RABID is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Front Page News > GMI Front Page Polls



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.