![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City
Drives: 2007 Silverado Vortec Max 2007 CTS
Posts: 71
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
I think GM did bargan in bad faith i dont care what they say. I hope they come up with a solution
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 696
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 696
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
They really don't have a massive HQ in Canada...Basically a branch office. And if they do not need it, then get rid of it. The only way the compnay will survive in this competititve of a market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western PA - Pennsyltuckey
Drives: 2006 Colorado Z71 4x4
2007 Volkswagen Rabbit
Posts: 336
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
"The meeting came on the third day of protests at GM's Canadian headquarters in Oshawa. Union local president Chris Buckley, who had warned the protest would escalate if the outcome isn't satisfactory, said Friday it will continue."
What??? Escalate??? What are they going to do? Strike? They're going to close it anyways! For GM, a strike would be a godsend right now. Instead of fighting for the plant, I agree they should work on trying to get additional shifts added at the other Oshawa plants. My '95 Monte Carlo was built up there and I was very pleased w/ the quality of it. I have no complaints w/ those plants (from a product build quality standpoint).
__________________
2007 Volkswagen Rabbit 2006 Colorado Z71 4x4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,757
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Oct 2006
Drives: 2007 GMC Canyon CrewCab 4x4 Z71
Posts: 568
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
__________________
The fastest way to kill a thread is a direct injection of verifiable facts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Apr 2003
Drives: '04 GMC Envoy
'06 Buick Allure(LaCrosse)
Posts: 330
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Reality is that this is a public relations nightmare for GM. It is far more than just a plant closure. The recent transition away from large SUV's and trucks is proof of how fickle the general public can be. If enough sources suggest that something is bad, the public believe it. Yes, trucks and SUV's burn more fuel than most cars, but the public has turned against all large SUV's/trucks, even the most efficient ones.
Only 2 years ago a well appointed large SUV or truck was viewed as a luxury vehicle. Today, many people view the same vehicles with distain. They laugh at their owners and now woulnd't even consider buying one at any price. My point, for much of my life GM cars have been viewed as a good investment with better than average depreciation. All of this is quickly fading, just as the public's love for large SUV's is fading. GM's constant negative media coverage, from declining sales to recent plant closures is having a strong impact on public perception. Today, mention the fact you own a GM product and now many people look at you with pity. Simply put, in a meeting today a colleague made the comment "we have a strong and positive future...not like General Motors". Worse yet, the audience laughed. They understood the message. GM management would have better off not signing the agreement with the Oshawa workers a few weeks ago. At least GM management could have saved some dignity by being honest.
__________________
GMC Envoy |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spring, TX, MX (Houston)
Drives: 1986 Ford RS200 EVO
Posts: 6,933
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
It was really a shock to hear of the closings tuesday, especially of Oshawa Truck as so many trucks come out of there. I sympathize with the workers, but no job is guaranteed.
I'm sure we'll see sabotage from here on out.
__________________
Andrew - MySpace - KD5FHW ![]() 1995 Buick Roadmaster Limited - LT1, 4L60E, 2.93 Gears, 260HP, 4,200LBS, 15.4SEC 1/4-MI, 21MPG 2005 Chevrolet Silverado C1500 LS - LM7, 4L60E, 3.73 Gears, 300HP, 4,200LBS, 15.0SEC 1/4-MI, 19.0MPG ![]() "Gas mileage is fine, but keep in mind, the first question any car buyer asks themselves is, 'Will this get me laid?'"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha Nebraska, USA
Drives: '08 Malibu LT
'94 Plymouth Voyager
Posts: 4,887
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
![]()
__________________
When you turn your car on....does it return the favor? Past Rides: '90 Lincoln Mark VII '93 Ford Taurus GL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western PA - Pennsyltuckey
Drives: 2006 Colorado Z71 4x4
2007 Volkswagen Rabbit
Posts: 336
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
I was thinking strike. If that's the case, that's wholly worse than what I was thinking. If they do worse than that, any sympathy I had will be gone. Ridiculous.
__________________
2007 Volkswagen Rabbit 2006 Colorado Z71 4x4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 64
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
I have my doubts about anyone being threatened personally...unless it was the beligerent woman in the Mercedes that first day. Anyway, the action that is taking place now is merely blocking deliveries with a convoy (the car plant and , ironically, the truck plant are both working this Saturday). Hardly dangerous.
If fp115 has some further inside info, perhaps he would care to share it? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|