![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N.W.Ontario
Posts: 4,770
|
GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
http://ctv2.theglobeandmail.com/serv...N/ctv-business
DETROIT — General Motors Corp. has rebuffed an attempt by its Canadian union to win a reprieve for a pickup truck plant slated for shutdown, sticking to its contention that a shift in consumer attitudes has devastated demand for the vehicles. A one-hour meeting in Detroit Friday between the company's senior executives and union leaders failed to produce any promise that the Oshawa, Ont., plant east of Toronto will remain open, dashing the hopes of the Canadian Auto Workers, which had hoped to find a compromise. “We're walking away extremely disappointed. We still feel betrayed,” CAW president Buzz Hargrove said after the meeting with GM chief executive Rick Wagoner, chief financial officer Fritz Henderson and GM Canada president Arturo Elias. “They're still saying that things changed radically enough that they can't live up to their commitment.” The union contends the plant shutdown, which will put 2,600 employees out of work next year, violates a collective agreement signed in May, in which the union agreed to several concessions to maintain the jobs. It says the automaker promised that Oshawa would build a new generation of light-duty trucks to be introduced in 2011 in exchange for millions of dollars in labour cost reductions. GM has said it is simply responding to dropping demand for pickup trucks made at the factory, in the wake of soaring gasoline prices that have made fill ups prohibitively expensive for owners of the Silverados and other half-ton trucks assembled in Oshawa. GM Canada spokesman Stew Low said the company understands the union's disappointment, but maintained there was a “good exchange” in Detroit between the two sides at the meeting. Mr. Low said the company did bargain in good faith because at the time of negotiations with the CAW it believed the shift in demand away from trucks was cyclical. Data gathered since then, Mr. Low said, showed that it wasn't, and that the drop in demand accelerated “rapidly and dramatically”. The meeting came on the third day of protests at GM's Canadian headquarters in Oshawa. Union local president Chris Buckley, who had warned the protest would escalate if the outcome isn't satisfactory, said Friday it will continue. “It's tough on everybody but we'll get through this together,” said Mr. Buckley, who planned to return to Oshawa to speak with workers there. At the blockade, Jim Freeman, 53, who has worked at the truck plant for 25 years, said he was surprised GM did not offer a solution that would have kept the factory open. “Then, I guess, their request is denied to come into their building,” said Mr. Freeman. “It shows you how heartless they are, right?” he said. “They have no loyalty to employees that produce the best vehicles in the world.” Mr. Hargove said the union will discuss its options after its national convention next week. “We may go to the labour board, we may go to court, we may go to expedited arbitration, or we may take some other action,” he said following what he described as a “tense” meeting. “It wasn't a great meeting. They had made up their minds going in.” Under the labour agreement reached with GM, a plant in Oshawa will begin building a new Camaro sports car, along with a rear-wheel drive car. The contract also preserved one shift at the truck assembly factory in Oshawa until 2009. But GM said this week that rising fuel prices have lessened demand for gas-guzzling pickup trucks much faster than expected and it would therefore have to stop truck production at the plant. Mr. Hargrove said the union told GM it is not convinced that economic conditions changed so radically in such a short time. He said Mr. Wagoner told the CAW he wants to work with the union to bring a possible third vehicle to the GM car plant in Oshawa “but the problem with that is it's difficult for us to get our minds around that when they've made a clear-cut commitment on the truck plant.” |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 3,593
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
I guess the CAW can't really see what's happening. Things are changing, and truck sales have slowed drastically. And I doubt we'll see an increase even if gas prices go down. Folks are simply too shocked now to think any downturn will be anything but temporary.
The CAW should be trying to get smaller vehicles into Oshawa by negotiating a good deal with GM. They're no longer the low-cost supplier for GM due to the dollar so they have to do something innovative. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Drives: '03 Cavalier
Posts: 1,293
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
The CAW should be begging GM for a small car. Right now they are acting like children. There is no way GM is ever going to produce trucks at Oshawa ever again. The market won't support it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,109
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
You know GM really should offer a solution (ex. temporary shutdown for re-tooling the plant for car production). Its a no-brainer - keep the employees happy, have one of the best plants they have produce a volume seller car etc...
If GM were conducting research into the market conditions while the CAW negotiations were going on they should have at least provided for an alternative to truck/SUV production if the results of the research proved out they way it did.
__________________
"Whenever I’m suffering from Insomnia, I just look at a picture of a Toyota Camry and I’m straight off.." "This is a Renault Espace, probably the best of the people carriers. Not that that's much to shout about. That's like saying 'Oh good, I've got syphilis, the best of the sexually transmitted diseases!" www.dickipedia.org |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Drives: '07 Corvette Z51
Posts: 1,472
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
![]()
__________________
GM better hope the Volt is a runaway success, because all the eggs are in that basket!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Huber Heights, Ohio
Drives: '05 GMC Envoy & '06 TB
Posts: 560
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
No the smart thing to do is shut down Flint and Pontiac, Keep Oshawa building trucks with 2 shifts.
Retool Moraine for a car haha I have to keep on putting that in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 255
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
__________________
Current Ride: 2006 SAAB 9-5 proudly NOT made by the UAW-CAW. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 139
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
I have a feeling it is more expensive to produce vehicles in Canada than the US at this point in time. Not long ago, the exchange rate was $1.60 to $1. Now it is about even. What once was a huge difference is no longer.
It is unfortunate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 1,437
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
And what kind of loyalty has the union members shown to the company over the years? None at all.
__________________
I don't have a ride, but I do have a car. CNBC: "By all accounts, Rick Wagoner's done a hell of a job. Even his critics in the industry have told me Wagoner and his top lieutenants don't get enough credit for the job they're doing in Detroit." |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,757
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Financially that is not a good solution. Oshawa plant is more expensive to run than any other plants and it does not currently conform to government regulations which will be enforced in a few years. To add to this, vehicles out of Canada cost more to export into other markets and lose money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 801
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
GM can not make enough profit on a low priced vehicle,retail price under $15K made in north america to stay in business and pay the legacy costs. they need vehicles that make GM $5K/10K + profit per vehicle to stay in business.
__________________
chevy owner since 1953,30 new chevys and 11 new corvettes since 1959 ,# 11 2008 corvette in the garage ,2004 impala,1988 2500 silverado,former NASCAR tech inspector,retired race engine builder |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: on a golf course somewhere in US
Drives: 2007 Impala SS
Posts: 2,874
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
__________________
What, Me worry - Alfred E. Neuman
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Seattle
Drives: 1993 K- Blazer 4x4 Police
Posts: 687
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
I'm not sure if you've been following the downward spiral of the US dollar lately, but I'm pretty sure GM is going to build a lot of products at home in the US and export them vs. the other way around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 411
|
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|