GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Union and Labor Relations News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-06-2008, 11:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
doh
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
doh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N.W.Ontario
Posts: 4,770
GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

http://ctv2.theglobeandmail.com/serv...N/ctv-business

DETROIT — General Motors Corp. has rebuffed an attempt by its Canadian union to win a reprieve for a pickup truck plant slated for shutdown, sticking to its contention that a shift in consumer attitudes has devastated demand for the vehicles.

A one-hour meeting in Detroit Friday between the company's senior executives and union leaders failed to produce any promise that the Oshawa, Ont., plant east of Toronto will remain open, dashing the hopes of the Canadian Auto Workers, which had hoped to find a compromise.

“We're walking away extremely disappointed. We still feel betrayed,” CAW president Buzz Hargrove said after the meeting with GM chief executive Rick Wagoner, chief financial officer Fritz Henderson and GM Canada president Arturo Elias.

“They're still saying that things changed radically enough that they can't live up to their commitment.”

The union contends the plant shutdown, which will put 2,600 employees out of work next year, violates a collective agreement signed in May, in which the union agreed to several concessions to maintain the jobs. It says the automaker promised that Oshawa would build a new generation of light-duty trucks to be introduced in 2011 in exchange for millions of dollars in labour cost reductions.

GM has said it is simply responding to dropping demand for pickup trucks made at the factory, in the wake of soaring gasoline prices that have made fill ups prohibitively expensive for owners of the Silverados and other half-ton trucks assembled in Oshawa.

GM Canada spokesman Stew Low said the company understands the union's disappointment, but maintained there was a “good exchange” in Detroit between the two sides at the meeting.

Mr. Low said the company did bargain in good faith because at the time of negotiations with the CAW it believed the shift in demand away from trucks was cyclical.

Data gathered since then, Mr. Low said, showed that it wasn't, and that the drop in demand accelerated “rapidly and dramatically”.

The meeting came on the third day of protests at GM's Canadian headquarters in Oshawa. Union local president Chris Buckley, who had warned the protest would escalate if the outcome isn't satisfactory, said Friday it will continue.

“It's tough on everybody but we'll get through this together,” said Mr. Buckley, who planned to return to Oshawa to speak with workers there.

At the blockade, Jim Freeman, 53, who has worked at the truck plant for 25 years, said he was surprised GM did not offer a solution that would have kept the factory open.

“Then, I guess, their request is denied to come into their building,” said Mr. Freeman.

“It shows you how heartless they are, right?” he said.

“They have no loyalty to employees that produce the best vehicles in the world.”

Mr. Hargove said the union will discuss its options after its national convention next week.

“We may go to the labour board, we may go to court, we may go to expedited arbitration, or we may take some other action,” he said following what he described as a “tense” meeting.

“It wasn't a great meeting. They had made up their minds going in.”

Under the labour agreement reached with GM, a plant in Oshawa will begin building a new Camaro sports car, along with a rear-wheel drive car. The contract also preserved one shift at the truck assembly factory in Oshawa until 2009.

But GM said this week that rising fuel prices have lessened demand for gas-guzzling pickup trucks much faster than expected and it would therefore have to stop truck production at the plant.

Mr. Hargrove said the union told GM it is not convinced that economic conditions changed so radically in such a short time.

He said Mr. Wagoner told the CAW he wants to work with the union to bring a possible third vehicle to the GM car plant in Oshawa “but the problem with that is it's difficult for us to get our minds around that when they've made a clear-cut commitment on the truck plant.”
doh is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-06-2008, 11:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
zete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 3,593
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

I guess the CAW can't really see what's happening. Things are changing, and truck sales have slowed drastically. And I doubt we'll see an increase even if gas prices go down. Folks are simply too shocked now to think any downturn will be anything but temporary.

The CAW should be trying to get smaller vehicles into Oshawa by negotiating a good deal with GM. They're no longer the low-cost supplier for GM due to the dollar so they have to do something innovative.
zete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 12:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
jkennedy293's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Drives: '03 Cavalier
Posts: 1,293
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

The CAW should be begging GM for a small car. Right now they are acting like children. There is no way GM is ever going to produce trucks at Oshawa ever again. The market won't support it.
jkennedy293 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 12:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
VibenPontiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,109
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

You know GM really should offer a solution (ex. temporary shutdown for re-tooling the plant for car production). Its a no-brainer - keep the employees happy, have one of the best plants they have produce a volume seller car etc...

If GM were conducting research into the market conditions while the CAW negotiations were going on they should have at least provided for an alternative to truck/SUV production if the results of the research proved out they way it did.
__________________
"Whenever I’m suffering from Insomnia, I just look at a picture of a Toyota Camry and I’m straight off.."

"This is a Renault Espace, probably the best of the people carriers. Not that that's much to shout about. That's like saying 'Oh good, I've got syphilis, the best of the sexually transmitted diseases!"


www.dickipedia.org
VibenPontiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 12:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Ambalanche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Drives: '07 Corvette Z51
Posts: 1,472
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkennedy293 View Post
The CAW should be begging GM for a small car. Right now they are acting like children. There is no way GM is ever going to produce trucks at Oshawa ever again. The market won't support it.
+1! This just goes to show unlike what they said how big, bad GM doesn't care about the workers who build the best quality vehicles in the world, the union workers and leaders don't care about the company. Go ahead and keep building products you can't sell and that you have to put $10,000.00 on the hood so you eventually loose money on them. I need a job and it's your responsibility to provide it for me! What other industry allows this mentality? Not mine that's for sure!
__________________
GM better hope the Volt is a runaway success, because all the eggs are in that basket!
Ambalanche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 12:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Huber Heights, Ohio
Drives: '05 GMC Envoy & '06 TB
Posts: 560
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

No the smart thing to do is shut down Flint and Pontiac, Keep Oshawa building trucks with 2 shifts.

Retool Moraine for a car haha I have to keep on putting that in.
NfamousZ24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 12:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Janesville
Posts: 138
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

what about Janesville any talks of building a car at that plant?
drees1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 01:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
Clownzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 255
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
Originally Posted by VibenPontiac View Post
You know GM really should offer a solution (ex. temporary shutdown for re-tooling the plant for car production). Its a no-brainer - keep the employees happy, have one of the best plants they have produce a volume seller car etc...

If GM were conducting research into the market conditions while the CAW negotiations were going on they should have at least provided for an alternative to truck/SUV production if the results of the research proved out they way it did.
Solution? So GM can suffer more strikes that cost GM $$$$? You have to be joking. If I were in charge, there would be absolutely no GM plant in NA or Canada. Consider yourselves lucky that you are only losing one plant.......for now.....
__________________
Current Ride: 2006 SAAB 9-5 proudly NOT made by the UAW-CAW.
Clownzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 01:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 139
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

I have a feeling it is more expensive to produce vehicles in Canada than the US at this point in time. Not long ago, the exchange rate was $1.60 to $1. Now it is about even. What once was a huge difference is no longer.

It is unfortunate.
stick076 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 01:50 PM   #10 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
roteague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 1,437
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
Originally Posted by doh View Post
“They have no loyalty to employees that produce the best vehicles in the world.”
And what kind of loyalty has the union members shown to the company over the years? None at all.
__________________
I don't have a ride, but I do have a car.

CNBC: "By all accounts, Rick Wagoner's done a hell of a job. Even his critics in the industry have told me Wagoner and his top lieutenants don't get enough credit for the job they're doing in Detroit."
roteague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 01:53 PM   #11 (permalink)
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
 
fp115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,757
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
Originally Posted by NfamousZ24 View Post
No the smart thing to do is shut down Flint and Pontiac, Keep Oshawa building trucks with 2 shifts.

Retool Moraine for a car haha I have to keep on putting that in.
Financially that is not a good solution. Oshawa plant is more expensive to run than any other plants and it does not currently conform to government regulations which will be enforced in a few years. To add to this, vehicles out of Canada cost more to export into other markets and lose money.
fp115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 01:59 PM   #12 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
motorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 801
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkennedy293 View Post
The CAW should be begging GM for a small car. Right now they are acting like children. There is no way GM is ever going to produce trucks at Oshawa ever again. The market won't support it.
GM can not make enough profit on a low priced vehicle,retail price under $15K made in north america to stay in business and pay the legacy costs. they need vehicles that make GM $5K/10K + profit per vehicle to stay in business.
__________________
chevy owner since 1953,30 new chevys and 11 new corvettes since 1959 ,# 11 2008 corvette in the garage ,2004 impala,1988 2500 silverado,former NASCAR tech inspector,retired race engine builder
motorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 02:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
 
steverino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: on a golf course somewhere in US
Drives: 2007 Impala SS
Posts: 2,874
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
“It's tough on everybody but we'll get through this together,” said Mr. Buckley, who planned to return to Oshawa to speak with workers there.

At the blockade, Jim Freeman, 53, who has worked at the truck plant for 25 years, said he was surprised GM did not offer a solution that would have kept the factory open.

“Then, I guess, their request is denied to come into their building,” said Mr. Freeman.
Watch out. GM might realize that they don't really need a Headquarters building or staff in Canada either. With technology today everything can be run from the employees homes, remote locals around Oshawa or Detroit
__________________
What, Me worry - Alfred E. Neuman
steverino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 03:26 PM   #14 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
crooner214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Seattle
Drives: 1993 K- Blazer 4x4 Police
Posts: 687
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
Originally Posted by NfamousZ24 View Post
No the smart thing to do is shut down Flint and Pontiac, Keep Oshawa building trucks with 2 shifts.

Retool Moraine for a car haha I have to keep on putting that in.
I'm not sure if you've been following the downward spiral of the US dollar lately, but I'm pretty sure GM is going to build a lot of products at home in the US and export them vs. the other way around.
crooner214 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2008, 04:00 PM   #15 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
hotrod1949's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 411
Re: GM rebuffs union call to keep plant alive

Quote:
Originally Posted by fp115 View Post
Financially that is not a good solution. Oshawa plant is more expensive to run than any other plants and it does not currently conform to government regulations which will be enforced in a few years. To add to this, vehicles out of Canada cost more to export into other markets and lose money.
I don't think GM Canada has much of a future. I am starting to think that it will be only Honda,Toyota and possibly Ford building vehicles in Canada withing 5 years. Following this syory through the news, and hearing, and reading the general publics opinion of GM,and the vehicles they build, doesn't give me a good feeling for the future.
hotrod1949 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Union and Labor Relations News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.