![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 264
|
Re: CAW strikes again, at the Big 3's exspense
I'm surprised they actually went to the Big 2.8 for the money; I figured they would just tap into their respective IV drips and suck it out with a straw.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Feb 2006
Drives: 2005 GMC Sierra
1970 Firebird Formula 400
Posts: 49
|
Re: CAW strikes again, at the Big 3's exspense
Hmmm, 1.2 million. What is that? Six percent of what Mr. Wagoner makes in a year? Oh wait, Wagoner earned that fair and square. He has only lost 70 BILLION since he took over and there is still a little wiggle room left. Yeah Rick!!! My mistake, carry on with your bashing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Drives: 2008 Ford Escape Limited
2006 Ford Focus ZX4
Posts: 1,105
|
Re: CAW strikes again, at the Big 3's exspense
Based on inventory levels, I don't think there is anything GM or Chrysler has built in Canada that a strike would affect anytime soon. Ford could get burned on the Edge/Flex/MKX but they have a few months of inventory.
Maybe GM is just mending fences in Canada after the truck plant bad PR. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 411
|
Re: CAW strikes again, at the Big 3's exspense
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|