GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Alternative Fuels and Propulsion News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2008, 11:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
377Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Prairie district, Chicago, IL
Drives: 2004 A4 3.0 Quattro Cabriolet, 1998 Ford Explorer
Posts: 1,115
Re: Verenium Commissions Louisiana Cellulosic Ethanol Plant: $1.34/gallon target pric

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDan View Post
E85 capable vehicles are a good thing, but they are still optimized to run on gasoline. They are designed to just ACCEPT E85 without damaging components, and without degrading fuel economy "too much".

I long for the day when we can get vehicles optimized for E85. With the higher compression ratios possible (105+ octane,baby!), they would be more powerful, and fuel efficiency would be improved. But I'm not sure they'd run well (or run at all) with "mere" gasoline then.
It would be nice if they would consider thinking about wanting to try to take some baby steps. Its been pointed out here several times that the equipment that differentiates a flex motor from the gas only version is minimal, and IIRC in the neighborhood of $100. Ideal? No, what is. But as time goes on more and more of the general population of vehicles having this capability would have positive effects--you can use E85 if you have/want to, incentive for producers to increase supply, try to produce more efficiently/cheaper, thus encouraging mftrs to improve their flex fuel offerings, etc.

A turbo motor could go very far towards optimal operation on either gas, ethanol, or any combination of the two by varying boost based on fuel composition.

But GM for one insists on having flex fuel & non flex versions of the same motor, which I don't really get.
__________________
377Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Alternative Fuels and Propulsion News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.