GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Alternative Fuels and Propulsion News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-18-2007, 11:21 AM   #16 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
 
nadepalma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,636
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

For some reason I think I saw a similar article on A123 is in this month's Popular Mechanics.

Good news though...
__________________
Email: nadepalma@gminsidenews.com

"La vita è come un albero di Natale..c'è sempre qualcuno che ti rompe le palle!"

"You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves"
-Abraham Lincoln

"Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried"
-Winston Churchill

"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a Congress"
-John Adams
nadepalma is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-18-2007, 12:14 PM   #17 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
megeebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2005 STS 3.6
Posts: 3,485
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al465
The US should treat this challenge just as great as the race to the moon we had decades ago. Even more so because the benefits would be much greater and maybe we could tell the Mid East oil to shove it. Also, this could put the American auto industry back on it's feet.

I AGREE !!!!
__________________
Live in the Seattle area? Love your car? Call these guys:

-www.nwautosalon.com
megeebee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 12:35 PM   #18 (permalink)
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
 
ptmeyer84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 97
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPERBADD75
GM should team up with another automaker (or two) to get the battery technology and their car to market before Toyota. Honda would almost certainly like to have it before Toyota, and they wouldn't be a major threat to GM due to their size. Ford would also be a good partner. anything to beat Toyota at their own game and be the first to the market with this technology.
A little help from our government wouldn't hurt either. But hell will freeze over before our government would help a company that sells gas-guzzleing, environment warming suvs
ptmeyer84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 12:42 PM   #19 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
CaptainDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Drives: '05 GTO
Posts: 1,011
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptmeyer84
A little help from our government wouldn't hurt either. But hell will freeze over before our government would help a company that sells gas-guzzleing, environment warming suvs
But it would help them to make those suvs NOT guzzle and warm!
__________________
'05 GTO
6.0 Liter LS2
400 horsepower
Anything less is just a hamster on a wheel.
CaptainDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 04:33 PM   #20 (permalink)
GWD
2.5L Iron Duke
 
GWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Easton, MA
Drives: 2004 Chevy Colorado 2003 Saturn Vue
Posts: 27
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Well, I'm not going to buy any more Panasonic stuff since they wouldn't even talk to GM.

Screw 'em.
GWD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 07:02 PM   #21 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
TORRED1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Drives: 2004 GTO 2006 HHR
Posts: 524
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by ptmeyer84
A little help from our government wouldn't hurt either. But hell will freeze over before our government would help a company that sells gas-guzzleing, environment warming suvs

If you read the article you will see that the govt is helping with money, infact just as much as the Japanese, here is a quote from the article

"The U.S. Department of Energy, in collaboration with the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium, which is made up of Detroit's three auto makers, last year awarded A123 a $15 million contract to develop its version of lithium-ion technology for hybrid-electric vehicle applications. In addition to the A123 contract, the Energy Department has requested $41 million this year to continue advanced battery research. There are also broad energy programs under which that could provide loan guarantees to battery companies"
TORRED1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 11:13 PM   #22 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
john1701a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 681
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcjohnso99
Only if you putt around below 30mph.
That isn't how the system actually works.

Up to 42 MPH, it can be pure electric. Beyond that speed, the engine will spin but may or may not use any gas. After having decended from a mountain, even highway speeds are delivered with only electricity.

So with additional battery capacity and a plug, extremely impressive MPG is indeed possible. It will compete well (friendly rivalry) with GM's solutions.

JOHN
john1701a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 01:03 AM   #23 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
plane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Just right here
Drives: 1980 'Vette
Posts: 4,970
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by john1701a
That isn't how the system actually works.

Up to 42 MPH, it can be pure electric...
Um, yeah, that is how it works.

Notice how you couched that in terms of coming off a steep mountain grade with a level 5 gale force tailwind, with the tires greased with Teflon lube, or something like that.

Surprisingly, some of us have actually driven a Prius.
Of course, if you've got some visual proof or a credible third-party test that clearly demonstrates that a Prius consistently remains at full electric at anything near 42 mph, well that would be a different matter.
__________________
Of all the properties which belong to honorable men, not one is so highly prized as that of character.
Henry Clay
plane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 07:50 AM   #24 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
Drives: 2002 GTP
Posts: 880
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by TORRED1
If you read the article you will see that the govt is helping with money, infact just as much as the Japanese, here is a quote from the article

"The U.S. Department of Energy, in collaboration with the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium, which is made up of Detroit's three auto makers, last year awarded A123 a $15 million contract to develop its version of lithium-ion technology for hybrid-electric vehicle applications. In addition to the A123 contract, the Energy Department has requested $41 million this year to continue advanced battery research. There are also broad energy programs under which that could provide loan guarantees to battery companies"
Still, more should be done. If the US government can spend billions researching global warming, $41 million for such an important development seems small by comparison. I agree with others here... focus on the race for developing new technologies rather than stifling the auto companies through regulation.

More money for the carrot, less for the stick.
__________________
2007 Avalanche, Black LTZ 4x4
2002 Grand Prix Black GTP, Intercooled

Last edited by tholland : 04-19-2007 at 07:53 AM.
tholland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 10:05 AM   #25 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
CaptainDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Drives: '05 GTO
Posts: 1,011
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by GWD
Well, I'm not going to buy any more Panasonic stuff since they wouldn't even talk to GM.

Screw 'em.
Check your cell phone battery. Your laptop battery. the batteries in your cordless power tools. On and on. It's not just cars. The government should be PILING money into battery research. It affects a very broad spectrum of the economy beyond autos.
__________________
'05 GTO
6.0 Liter LS2
400 horsepower
Anything less is just a hamster on a wheel.
CaptainDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 10:30 AM   #26 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
XP300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Illinois
Drives: 03 CTS
Posts: 736
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Wasn't it litlium-ion batteries that were exploding in cell phones and laptops?

We don't need no exploding Priuses around here. Then again, maybe we do!

Last edited by XP300 : 04-19-2007 at 03:28 PM.
XP300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2007, 11:41 PM   #27 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
CaptainDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Drives: '05 GTO
Posts: 1,011
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by XP300
Wasn't it litlium-ion batteries that were exploding in cell phones and laptops?

We don't need no exploding Priuses around here. Then again, maybe we do!
The new Toyota Pinto!
__________________
'05 GTO
6.0 Liter LS2
400 horsepower
Anything less is just a hamster on a wheel.
CaptainDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 12:36 AM   #28 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
Lawnchair8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Drives: '00 Pontiac Grand Am
Posts: 238
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

we need this yesterday
Lawnchair8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 08:28 PM   #29 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Wolfman01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Drives: 1997 Ford F150 (161k) 1998 Jeep Cherokee SE (152k
Posts: 1,301
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by plane
Um, yeah, that is how it works.

Notice how you couched that in terms of coming off a steep mountain grade with a level 5 gale force tailwind, with the tires greased with Teflon lube, or something like that.

Surprisingly, some of us have actually driven a Prius.
Of course, if you've got some visual proof or a credible third-party test that clearly demonstrates that a Prius consistently remains at full electric at anything near 42 mph, well that would be a different matter.
And apparently, you aren't one of them. The Prius CAN run up to 42 mph on electric only. You can FEEL the slight bump as the engine gets spun up. If you have excess electric power available, especially after a long downhill run where the car spent alot of time in regen mode, the car's system WILL make use of it. I was also able to do the EXACT SAME THINGS with my Ford Escape Hybrid. That one even had a tachometer that showed the engine was indeed off.
__________________
1989 Nissan Truck (68k)
1994 Safari Sarengeti 37' Diesel Pusher RV (92k)
1997 Ford F150 (168k) - for sale $2,500 firm
1998 Jeep Cherokee SE (RV Toad) (161k)
2008 Chevy Impala 2LT FFV with AFM (18k)
Wolfman01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2007, 08:35 PM   #30 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
plane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Just right here
Drives: 1980 'Vette
Posts: 4,970
Re: In Quest for Better Battery, Keep an Ion Nationalism

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfman01
And apparently, you aren't one of them. The Prius CAN run up to 42 mph on electric only. You can FEEL the slight bump as the engine gets spun up. If you have excess electric power available, especially after a long downhill run where the car spent alot of time in regen mode, the car's system WILL make use of it. I was also able to do the EXACT SAME THINGS with my Ford Escape Hybrid. That one even had a tachometer that showed the engine was indeed off.
Breathtakingly incorrect.
I have driven a Prius.
Anything over 30 in urban traffic, the motor kicked in.
Any time we went uphill the motor kicked in.
Hell, just getting out of the parking lot, the motor kicked in.
Going downhill? A different matter altogether.

"Yeah, I drive to work and it's downhill both ways."

My post stands as written.
__________________
Of all the properties which belong to honorable men, not one is so highly prized as that of character.
Henry Clay
plane is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Alternative Fuels and Propulsion News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.