![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,253
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Anyone notice that Volt has now been changed from a Plug-in Series Hybrid to a Plug-in Parallel Hybrid just like Prius?
I knew this would happen. First we heard that like with CVT gearboxes the Volts extender engine was supposed to be so efficient because it would be optimised for a single rpm range. Then just as all the CVT cars were deemed unbearable to drive like that and programmed to vary rev range to mimic a conventional engine, so too we heard that they had decided to do that with Volt. Next we hear they are having trouble with the recharge cycles of the Volt battery and that they have decided they can't afford to recharge it on the run as it would lower the life of the battery too greatly, so the ICE would only do "charge sustaining" at 30% state of charge of the battery and that the extender engine would indeed send electrical power directly to the electric driving engine. ![]() Then we see this above graph and it shows that the cumulative effect of all these changes means that the Volt's series hybrid layout is less efficient than the Prius' parallel hybrid layout, where the range extending engine's power can be more efficiently applied to move the vehicle if connected by mechanical gearing directly to the wheels. And now here we see the new 1.4 range extending engine attached directly to the casting of the front differential and drive shafts. No guesses for how they are connected inside - 2-mode hybrid. So basically the Volt is now just a 1.4 litre 2-Mode hybrid FWD small sedan that’s happens to have a big enough battery to drive 40 miles on electricity while lugging around the 1.4 ICE that does noting until the power runs out. The only thing that GM will now be doing to differentiate itself from Prius is that whereas a plug-in Prius can access additional ICE power at any time deemed as required by the on-board computer, the Volt will have an arbitrary 40 mile lockout of the use of the 1.4 ICE. Great…. ![]() ![]() Last edited by MonaroSS : 07-26-2008 at 06:03 AM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City
Drives: 2003 Saturn Vue & 1951 GMC 3/4 Ton P/U
Posts: 154
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
Last edited by packardlust : 07-26-2008 at 07:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Newburgh, NY
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS 6-spd
Posts: 167
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
"This is clearly part of the Large Hadron Collider. It has nothing to do with the Volt." *hurries Toyota engineers on to the next display* "And here we have a state-of-the-art powerplant that is very high in power output vs. external dimension and weight. We use an amazing cam-in-block technology and refer to it as the LS3. Perhaps something like this would benefit you in your NASCAR fantasies." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 5,484
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM. Current Cars: 2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4 2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6 1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6 Former Cars: 1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles) 1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles) Future Car: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L DI VVT V6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Drives: '07 Corvette Z51
Posts: 1,472
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
__________________
GM better hope the Volt is a runaway success, because all the eggs are in that basket!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 3,593
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
And it's not hard to figure out how the Volt works. It's not the mechanicals that are going to be special but the software. Let's all be honest, the mechanicals are obvious, they're similar to the EV1 but with a range extender -- which was GM's original design for the EV1. And I'm sure Toyota et al already know how the EV1 worked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2005 STS 3.6
Posts: 3,485
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Everyone is assuming this photo to be a certain thing. Does anyone have confirmation?
.
__________________
Live in the Seattle area? Love your car? Call these guys: -www.nwautosalon.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2005 STS 3.6
Posts: 3,485
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
..and the Ewoks will invade and destroy Toyota with logs and rocks while Flash Gordon beats the Borg to Automobile Magazine and MSN to head off publication of a unfavorable review..........God, this is exciting!
__________________
Live in the Seattle area? Love your car? Call these guys: -www.nwautosalon.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Drives: 2006 Mazda 3
2003 CTS - Sold
Posts: 1,145
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,253
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
http://gm.wieck.com/forms/gm/previewpage?048274 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,993
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
GM's point is that 78% of Americans don't drive more than 40 miles in one day. If those 78% bought Volts, they would almost NEVER use gas. If they bought Priuses, they would get very good mileage, but they would still be using gas. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,253
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
Quote:
No, my point is that it now appears that GM is scrapping their plan to make the Volt a series hybrid and are now, with the use of the same 1.4 engine used in other applications of the Volt's new Delta platform, going to make Volt a parallel hybrid like the Prius is. It will in effect be a 2-mode hybrid for Delta. The exception being that they will have the software arbitrarily prevent the driver from using the ICE until after the battery pack reduces to a 30% state of charge. In other words, GM is backtracking and watering Volt down to something that is nothing like what it started out to be.... The accountants are winning this war.... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Drives: 2006 Mazda 3
2003 CTS - Sold
Posts: 1,145
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
^^^^^
You sound very knowledgeable but I don't understand something. You are stating I presume that Gm is making the Volt into something it was not originally to save money. At the same time you are saying it is becoming for efficient. Is that correct? |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
|
Re: Possible Production Volt Range Extending Engine Pic
I just find it funny that the only fuel efficient car to come out of GM in years isn't even out yet and is going to cost 45 to 50 thousand bucks.
Meanwhile honda is working on a new hybrid that will cost 19,500 bucks. GM, is there some reason you can't built a cheap, fuel efficient car and honda can? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|