![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 463
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Not everyone will like it .... BUT some will buy ... IF ... THE PRICE IS RIGHT!
See if you can find an image of the Scorpio ....
__________________
44 mpg by 2010
Last edited by 44 mpg by 2010 : 06-20-2009 at 09:23 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 309
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
andretti : >>"It takes the vision of the imports to recognize a market potential (small diesel pickups)."<<
'Vision of the imports', eh? So the question that rises to the surface is- where is toyota's small diesel pickup ?? Honda's ?? Nissan's ?? Subaru's ?? Where's the "import vision" from these established players ? It's toyota & nissan that stand to bear the brunt of any supposed mahindra marketshare grab, since they are the sales & profit leaders of the segment, not GM. RE the design- we've come some distance in styling/design in the last 10 years.... a retro-esque generic throwback to 1977 is NOT going to pack them into the half-handful of mahindra dealerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 539
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Quote:
GM and Ford sell alot of cheap small trucks that are actually used for work while Toyota and Nissan are more in the "family SUV but with a bed" market, selling more crew cabs and well equipped models. I hardly ever see 2-door Tacomas, I'm pretty sure Nissan doesn't even make a regular cab Frontier, and I bet the small engine sales to large engine sales ratio is notably smaller for Nissan and Toyota than GM and Ford (at least based on what I see here in South Carolina). And ignoring brand loyaties and styling, a cheap little pickup like this is more likely to win over someone who buys a 4-cyl single cab Ranger or Colorado that hauls stuff for a farmer or plumber than a V-6 crew cab Tacoma or Frontier to drive the family to dinner on Friday night and the lake with Jet Skis on Saturday. However, most GM/Ford buyers are more brand loyal, especially in trucks, and anyone who buys a Tacoma has no qualms with an ugly truck, so the end result will likely that any effect this truck has will be spread out pretty equally over all of the major players. Last edited by CUtiger08 : 06-20-2009 at 10:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
That 4.5L diesel in a half ton Sierra/Silverado would sell like hotcakes. I work at a dealership and that is the number one complaint about our new trucks.
Here's an idea: Why doesn't GM ask their dealers what people are looking for? Toyota did it, worked okay for them. I really wonder who is making the decisions in this company. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Syracuse-Alexandria Bay NY-Daytona
Drives: 07 DTS-07 CHEVY 2500
84 Z-28-72 GTO
Posts: 1,092
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
YAWN!!!!!!!!!!
Here we go with the old " Why don't GM (or other Detroit3 automaker) have diesels in their vehicle lineups cuz the "superior" imports do" AGAIN! In case some of you folks have been asleep and have forgot that GM and others had many diesels in the 80s that NOBODY bought! Remember: Forgetting the awful GM fullsizers with the 350 diesel what about these? 80s Chevette/t-100s /Chevy s-10s with the 4 cyl. Isuzu DIESEL? 80s Olds Cutlass and other GM intermediates with the 6 cyl. DIESEL? Ford had several diesel models also: 80s Lincoln Marks with the BMW DIESEL and stick shifts too! 80s Courier and Ranger pickups had DIESELS Mopar had a few limited DIESEL models also but can't recall which! SO WHY isn't Detroit pushing MORE Diesels NOW? NOBODY BUYS THEM! They didn't buy them then so why would they sell NOW? Except for large pickup trucks and a few zealots who buy the VW diesels there are FEW people who put their money where their mouth is !!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
07 Chevy 2500 07 DTS-84-Z-28/72 GTO 77 Triumph Bonneville Syracuse NY-Daytona Alexandria Bay NY |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 6,230
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Quote:
__________________
Owner of vehicles powered by a Buick even-fire V6, Chevy 60 degree OHV V6, a big block Buick V8, and a quadrozontal Triple-X08:take your hybrids and shove em up yer ass, i'll take my fuel injection and carburetors, and still make 30+ mpg. and i wont look like a douchebag driving it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N.W.Ontario
Posts: 5,559
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Quote:
I am waiting for the Global Ranger. 4 doors with a 4 banger diesel, sign me up! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Drives: The bailout pkg
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
We got one small chance on all this.
One of the American Big Three will, in the process of tryin' to both do something for PU sales in general while getting a leg up on the other two will go ahead and pull the trigger. Ford really should go first but regardless of who does they'll get the most from it.
__________________
In regards to the VOLT With a typical annual driving pattern < totaling 11,390 miles - including three 450 mile trips and a bunch of 40 mile plus per days > and assuming you only charge <once > per overnight: Vehicle ……………… Gallons per year Volt ………………….. 37 Prius ………………… 228 30 MPG car ………… 380 20 MPG car ………… 570 Dave G. Last edited by AMERICA 123 : 09-03-2009 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 539
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Quote:
Obviously this market's results are affected in a big way by the weakness of Japan in big trucks and Detroit's strength in the same... but still, the small ones make up about 20% of pickup sales in the US and I doubt that'll go down with the smaller/greener trends we've go going. GM and/or Ford could definately get back into the fray with a good little diesel truck... especially since they already have them overseas... though probably not emissions-ready for the US. A truly global Ranger or Colorado, with a great diesel engine option, is a short to mid-term must IMO. Actually, if they get the right sized diesel going, they could put it in both big and small trucks. The 2.9L V-6 that GM showed off a while back (that's since been shelved for the time being IIRC) had around 250hp and 400lb-ft. That compares pretty well with GM's 5.3L overall, so it could make a good "green with grunt" engine for 1/2 ton models while being an excellent range topping engine for a GMT-355 sized model.
__________________
Car Size and Price Discussion Thread (Feedback Needed!!) August Sales Analysis Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Walking
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Drives: 94 Impala SS Clone
99 Police Pkg Tahoe
88 Z71 Si
Posts: 8
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Quote:
Most people who purchase Diesel powered trucks do so because they NEED them, not want them. If you pull anything of significant weight and are responsible for filling its gas tank, then you prefer a Diesel. Fact! There is a reason why ALL semis have Diesel engines. Their more fuel efficent, longer lasting and more reliable than Gasonline. Another fact is Gasoline engines havent got much more fuel efficent over the last 100 yrs. Added gears in transmission, better aerodynamics, Fuel Injection, Displacement on Demand has only marginally improved fuel economy. Oil Companies know this and thats why they lean on the Government so hard to make it nearly impossible for automakers to produce a Diesel. If you dont believe me check the records at VW and Mercedes when they produced a Diesel in the US market, VW had to quit selling its V10 diesel in its SUV until it could pass the new stricter laws and Mercedes has to delay the Blutec launch until it did the same. The big 3 want to give the customers what they want and what they will buy but unfortunatly Big Oil doesnt make it easy. Big Oil knows that a huge influx of fuel efficent diesels to the US market would really hurt fuel demand and lower prices. Big Oil has become accustom to triple digit profit margins and spreads that power and money to all politicans who will sell their influence. I need a large SUV to haul family and trailers/boats. GM and Ford both quit making diesel powered large SUV's. I would of bought a fleet of Hummer H2's if GM would of put the Duramax in them.The big 3 are the only players in the Police/Taxi fleet game and none of the big 3 sell a diesel in this market. Guess what stupidity cost? A freaking start up company (Carbon Motors) goes to a little town in Indiana and builds a Specialty Police Vehicle with guess what a turbo diesel that gets over 35mpg and can idle for hours like cops cars do and last over 250k miles and is faster (155mph)than any cop car produced in by the big 3 even the Hemi Charger. Law enforcement sales alone are over 60k cars a year and the taxi market is over 100k cars a year. Carbon Motors will gladly take this from the Big 3 and show the Big 3 how they used to do business! Here in the US and with US workers! What do I drive? A Mercedes 300 with a Blutec Diesel that gets a true 37mpg. Show me another large sedan in the US that even offers a diesel or true 37mpg. I have owned a Hybrid Tahoe and got nowhere near 20mpg like it said on the window sticker, same goes for my wife's Mini Cooper it said 37mpg and it averaged 24mpg. I pull with a 2006 Hummer H1 Alpha, its big, hard to park, but tough as nails and gets 18mpg. I wish the GM would put a Diesel in every vehicle they produce. I grew up in a GM family and have loyalty towards GM, but currently my fleet is VW Jetta's, Tourgage's, Mercedes 300's, ML's, GL's and RL's all Diesels and the worst gets 24mpg. When sells at the Big 3 are as bad as they are they all need to look at markets like the overlooked market that I reside in. Last edited by ejf2461 : 09-09-2009 at 10:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Sep 2006
Drives: 06 Daytona Blue HHR 5-speed
Posts: 1,225
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Quote:
__________________
18" Polished Cobalt SS/SC wheels, LED tails, Recon 48 LED running board lights/signals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
I "was" a dedicated GM guy, but after seeing the new trucks come though with an optional rear inner fender cover ..... come on.... I've been an employee of GM for 14 years working on these rigs, and will say they are not worth the $ ..
As for not producing a small diesel in the US. when you can get them everywhere else in the world is beyond words.... Now that they are Goverment Motors in stead of General Motors(not really ) but you get the point. I hate to buy anything from another country but they are making it very difficult. As for the big oil companies I will burn Bio fuel at all cost before lining their pockets. So bring on the small diesel GM and redeem your self before Ford beats you too it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 463
|
Re: Small displacement diesel pickups in 2009?
Quote:
ejf2461 suggested the idea of a 24 month waiver was ignoring the market. Quite the opposite. Under the waive (and after) there should be NO restriction of YOUR choice to have a "big guzzler" ... only adding the opportunity for those that need/want lighter diesel vehicles ... to have a choice also. The 44 mpg(US) combined cycle 2 ton diesel Ford Mondeo can tow 2 tons (with surge brakes on the trailer).
__________________
44 mpg by 2010
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|