GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Employee/Customer Discussion > Letters To GM
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2009, 03:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
2.5L Iron Duke
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: INDY
Drives: 04 SILVERADO Z71 1967 CAMARO RS
Posts: 20
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
I agree that we need Sport models, that said, let's not overuse the SS name...*looks at last-gen Malibu SS*

SS badges belong only on cars that deserve SS badges. Trailblazer SS was one. Malibu SS was not.

Amen
Hoagie is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-14-2009, 04:33 PM   #17 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
Slideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OC, CA
Drives: '07 Colorado 2wd
Posts: 2,279
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoagie View Post
The reason is,,,,,,there is no market for SS cars or trucks anymore. the Trailblazers and Silverado's sat on the lots. same as the Colbalts. people today just don't get into it like us old guys did.
That's just not true. There are plenty of younger kids that love to modify vehicles. Mark my words, the 15-20 year olds that are hacking up S-10s and Tacomas today will be the hot rodders 10-15 years from now when they can afford some older, classic iron. Just because a Silverado or Trailblazer SS sat on the lots doesn't mean that there isn't a desire for performance.
Slideways is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 04:41 PM   #18 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,931
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

SS should mean "the sportiest .... in Chevrolet's line up." The sportiest Impala should be the Impala SS. The sportiest Chevelle was the SS. Nova SS, Camaro SS, and so on. Not on lesser cars, or trucks.
Dr. Show-Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 05:09 PM   #19 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
Slideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OC, CA
Drives: '07 Colorado 2wd
Posts: 2,279
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Show-Me View Post
SS should mean "the sportiest .... in Chevrolet's line up." The sportiest Impala should be the Impala SS. The sportiest Chevelle was the SS. Nova SS, Camaro SS, and so on. Not on lesser cars, or trucks.
It seems like you're saying two different things. First you say that the top of the line of every model should be the SS, then you say only the top cars should get it. Nova was a "lesser" car than Malibu which was a "lesser" car than Impala and Camaro was a "lesser" car than the Corvette, yet they all wore the badge. There was also an El Camino SS, which was a BOF ute/truck. Was it not deserving of the badge?

I don't see why people seem to have this haze of nostalgia that makes them think that every SS Impala had a 409 and every SS Camaro had a 427.
Slideways is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 09:52 AM   #20 (permalink)
1.4 Liter Turbocharged ECOTEC
 
Jamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 97
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

I know that Chevrolet should have something 'SS' for the Malibu. It should have a manual transmission and some tire/suspension upgrade. And maybe a higher output engine.
Jamo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 10:12 AM   #21 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
solman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Drives: 06 Daytona Blue HHR 5-speed
Posts: 1,225
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by T'Cal View Post
^Agreed, especially since we no longer have Pontiac around to offer sporty looking versions of Chevy vehicles.
But Pontiac hadn't offered anything of it's own it decades. There is a reason there gone. Grill swaps does not = sporty.
__________________

18" Polished Cobalt SS/SC wheels, LED tails, Recon 48 LED running board lights/signals
solman98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 10:13 AM   #22 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
solman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Drives: 06 Daytona Blue HHR 5-speed
Posts: 1,225
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamo View Post
I know that Chevrolet should have something 'SS' for the Malibu. It should have a manual transmission and some tire/suspension upgrade. And maybe a higher output engine.
They should offer a manual in everything IMO.
__________________

18" Polished Cobalt SS/SC wheels, LED tails, Recon 48 LED running board lights/signals
solman98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 05:16 PM   #23 (permalink)
1.4 Liter Turbocharged ECOTEC
 
Jamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 97
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by solman98 View Post
They should offer a manual in everything IMO.

And there is no reason on earth that it shouldn't be as slick as the Japanese competition and made here in the once great USA.
Jamo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 07:09 PM   #24 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
Slideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OC, CA
Drives: '07 Colorado 2wd
Posts: 2,279
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by solman98 View Post
They should offer a manual in everything IMO.
Yes, in a perfect would they would, but people don't buy them, so GM won't build them. It's as simple as that. I don't know the numbers, but it must not be worth the marginal customers it loses to make the option available. Have any of you had to commute in city traffic with a manual? I have. It quickly saps the fun of shifting your own gears.
Slideways is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 10:40 AM   #25 (permalink)
2.5L Iron Duke
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: INDY
Drives: 04 SILVERADO Z71 1967 CAMARO RS
Posts: 20
hoagie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slideways View Post
That's just not true. There are plenty of younger kids that love to modify vehicles. Mark my words, the 15-20 year olds that are hacking up S-10s and Tacomas today will be the hot rodders 10-15 years from now when they can afford some older, classic iron. Just because a Silverado or Trailblazer SS sat on the lots doesn't mean that there isn't a desire for performance.


I didn't say there was no desire for performance, they just don't want a rebadged sedan.

I'm at the drag strip every weekend racing, I think I know what kids want.

Never seen a Tacoma hacked up and raced.
Hoagie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 11:54 AM   #26 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 261
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoagie View Post
The reason is,,,,,,there is no market for SS cars or trucks anymore. the Trailblazers and Silverado's sat on the lots. same as the Colbalts. people today just don't get into it like us old guys did.
That may be true, but that is why Chevrolet can use the "sport" label instead of SS. It doesn't have to be a truly super high-performance car at a much higher price. How about instead something with subtle body modifications? one size larger wheels/tires...a slight increase in performance?

My best ideas would be a new Equinox sport, different 19" or 20" wheels, 1 inch lower to the ground, and the DI 3.6 engine.

How about a Malibu Sport, 1/2 inch lower to the ground, and the di 3.6?

Even the Cobalt..if the Cobalt SS didn't exist, they could make a Cobalt sport with 18" wheels, a 6 speed auto, and the new DI 2.4.

While GM may or may not be able to produce any of those 3 examples...those are examples that may be in higher demand than true "SS" models, and would probably only cost a bit more to produce.

Here is one more (not sure what the demand would be for it, but I'll throw it out), a Traverse sport/Outlook Redline/Acadia Denali/Enclave Super. Give them all 20" wheels, SLIGHT ground effects (please don't overdo it), and the 5.3 DOD V8.

Last edited by Smellhound : 09-16-2009 at 11:57 AM.
Smellhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 12:52 PM   #27 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
Slideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OC, CA
Drives: '07 Colorado 2wd
Posts: 2,279
Re: hoagie

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoagie View Post
[/b]

I didn't say there was no desire for performance, they just don't want a rebadged sedan.

I'm at the drag strip every weekend racing, I think I know what kids want.

Never seen a Tacoma hacked up and raced.
And I'm at car shows every weekend and I know that a lot of talented kids are working on whatever they can get their hands on. It's not just drag racing though, there are a lot of avenues of performance.
Slideways is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 11:35 AM   #28 (permalink)
Walking
 
spectre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 2008 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Turbocharged
Posts: 11
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

Because Warranty is everything to some of us and aftermarket parts aren't nearly as widely researched as performance parts from the factory.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ss1dan12 View Post
Why pay the dealer or Gm( their rape fee) for items that you could purchase aftermarket and install yourself
__________________
2008 Cobalt SS Turbocharged: Muffler Delete, ledglow red footwell interior lighting kit.
spectre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 11:51 AM   #29 (permalink)
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 45
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

I think the should go back like the old days and offer several performance upgrades in all of their brands. Kind of like mild to wild and several in between upgrades. I don't mean like the latter years when they threw some body mods on and called it a ss. I mean true performance upgrades across the board,handling,power and the whole works.
firefox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2009, 12:34 PM   #30 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
HoeyHimself's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Drives: 2010 VW GTI
Posts: 4,850
Re: Chevrolet "sport" models

No amount of cosmetic enhancements will lipstick cover the pig that is known as the Equinox, so why bother?

If you want "sporty" models, Chevrolet is the wrong place to be looking. All you will get is obnoxious exterior treatment (see. Cobalt wing, Camaro bodykit, Trailblazer's prehistoric everything!) and cheap leather with "SS" embroidered in the headrest, as opposed to just plain-old cheap leather without headrest embroidery.

If you want sporting models, look at Mazda or you wake up and realize that your wasting your time because the sportiest of GM bread and butter will NEVER compare to the driving experience in a base-model BMW...
__________________
HoeyHimself is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Employee/Customer Discussion > Letters To GM



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.