Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

  1. Welcome to GM Inside News Forum – General discussion forum for GM

    Welcome to GM Inside News Forum - a website dedicated to all things GM.

    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, Join GM Inside News Forum today!
     
+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

  1. #1
    Editor
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    23,159
    Blog Entries
    3

    Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China
    Buick has already sold over 100,000 new Regal's since launch.
    www.gminsidenews.com
    April 28, 2010


    Shanghai – The Buick New Regal upper-medium sedan from Shanghai GM has received a maximum five-star safety rating from the China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CATARC), which recently released its C-NCAP (China New Car Assessment Program) ratings.

    The New Regal received a very high score of 49.7 points overall and a maximum score of 16 points in side impact crash tests against a moving deformable barrier. In frontal crash tests it received a score of 15.03 out of 16 points, while in 40 percent front offset crash testing it scored 15.65 out of 16 points. The New Regal received an additional three points for having a front seat seatbelt alert system, side air bags and side curtain air bags, and the ISOFIX anchoring system for child safety seats.

    According to GM China Group President and Managing Director Kevin Wale, “We are pleased but not surprised by the results. GM has made safety a priority in all of our vehicles built and sold in China. The New Regal’s design and occupant restraint systems are intended to meet all current and anticipated crash safety standards around the world.”

    The New Regal has a strong passenger safety cell protected by front and rear crumple zones. Special attention was given to minimizing the risk of intrusion from the engine. For improved side impact protection, steel door beams are mounted diagonally to help engage the side structure more effectively in spreading crash forces.

    A new active head restraint for the front seats was introduced in the New Regal to help reduce the risk of neck injury in the event of a rear-end collision. The front portion of the head restraint was pushed forward 45 millimeters by a new cable linkage, which is sufficient to restrict rearward head movement.

    Dual chamber head/thorax air bags are mounted on the outboard sides of the front seatbacks and full-length curtain air bags are installed in the roof. For further passenger protection, three-point seatbelts are provided for all seating positions, including the middle of the rear seat, with pyrotechnic pre-tensioners and load limiters on the front belts.

    In addition, tire sensors warn the driver if the pressure in any of the tires drops below the recommended level. Sensors in the valves initiate a radio signal and a warning message is illuminated on the main instrument display.

    The Buick New Regal was introduced in China in December 2008. Through the end of March 2010, Shanghai GM had sold 101,773 New Regals nationwide.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC upinottawa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ottawa, ON (Imported from Detroit - Windsor)
    Posts
    187

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    The five star safety rating is good to hear.

    However, it could be coated with lead paint and sold as a child's toy and still receive a five star safety rating in China....


    If New GM is going to compete globally, Chevrolet will need hatchbacks and wagons. Hopefully those models will be sold in North America (or at least Canada...).

  4. #3
    3.6 Liter SIDI V6 SuperSS27's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,056

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    So,....what does 5 star in China translate to in the USA? 1?

  5. #4
    3.0 Liter SIDI V6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    526

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    Quote Originally Posted by upinottawa View Post
    The five star safety rating is good to hear.

    However, it could be coated with lead paint and sold as a child's toy and still receive a five star safety rating in China....
    Darn, you stole my line. I was going to say prestigious a Chinese safety rating is, and now all they have to do is not use lead paint, asbestos, organic solvents, and make sure it can survive a crash over 5 mph.

  6. #5
    6.2 Liter LS3 V8 johnny smallblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3,138

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    Quote Originally Posted by upinottawa View Post
    The five star safety rating is good to hear.

    However, it could be coated with lead paint and sold as a child's toy and still receive a five star safety rating in China....
    You beat me to the same punch. I guess it's an obvious joke, but still a funny one.
    Current .......................R.I.P.
    2006 Ford Escape Hybrid...1999 H-nda Elite 80 (stolen)
    1996 H-nda Elite 80 .........1996 Caprice LT1 (donated when gas hit $4)
    1972 Cutlass Supreme......1995 H-nda Civic (slammed by a police car)
    .....................................1986 Plymouth Colt Vista (died)
    .....................................1978 Chevy Mailbu (sold)

    Quote Originally Posted by Buickman
    gfy

  7. #6
    6.2 Liter LS3 V8 johnny smallblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3,138

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    The Buick New Regal upper-medium sedan from Shanghai GM...
    The New Regal received a very high score...
    The New Regal received an additional three points...
    The New Regal has a strong passenger safety cell...
    The Buick New Regal was introduced in...
    Shanghai GM had sold 101,773 New Regals nationwide.
    Is it called The New Regal in China?
    Current .......................R.I.P.
    2006 Ford Escape Hybrid...1999 H-nda Elite 80 (stolen)
    1996 H-nda Elite 80 .........1996 Caprice LT1 (donated when gas hit $4)
    1972 Cutlass Supreme......1995 H-nda Civic (slammed by a police car)
    .....................................1986 Plymouth Colt Vista (died)
    .....................................1978 Chevy Mailbu (sold)

    Quote Originally Posted by Buickman
    gfy

  8. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,845

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    According to GM China Group President and Managing Director Kevin Wale, “We are pleased but not surprised by the results. GM typically does not abide by the population control vehicle saftey standards that we have here in Soviet China. The New Regal’s design and occupant restraint systems are intended to meet all current and anticipated crash safety standards around the world so they would most assuredly dominate any test that we would top, of course with the exception of interior toxicity levels... we usually have the highest of said levels”
    Fixed.

  9. #8
    6.0 Liter L76 V8 vanshmack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    78°14′46″N 15°27′56″E
    Posts
    2,246

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    The one in the picture has projectors, Quickening.

    Just sayin'.
    GMLS4.com: The only forum dedicated to the LS4 W-Body Front Drives!
    2006 Impala SS: Third transmission and counting. Ask me why!
    2002 Camaro Z28 (M6); LQ4 6.0, 243 heads, 218/228 cam, Hooker LTs, CalSpeed Tune, lots of LEDs


  10. #9
    6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 Quickening's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    7,727

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    Quote Originally Posted by vanshmack View Post
    The one in the picture has projectors, Quickening.

    Just sayin'.
    That would be the optional HID headlight assembly...


    2004 Saab 9-3 Aero

  11. #10
    GMI Staff Writer Premium Member Toto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ruhr Area, Germany
    Posts
    2,252

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSS27 View Post
    So,....what does 5 star in China translate to in the USA? 1?
    Don't know about the US, but 5-star rating China = 5-star rating Europe.

    Euro NCAP Insignia

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pida_0FL8GA"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pida_0FL8GA[/ame]
    Borussia Dortmund - Deutscher Meister 2011

  12. #11
    5.3 Liter Vortec V8 richmond2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,497

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    China follows the World car program (sorta) and that is part un UNECE "E" code and would have to test similar to Euro NCAP
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_F...le_Regulations
    Last edited by richmond2000; 04-29-2010 at 12:59 AM.

  13. #12
    3.6 Liter SIDI V6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,079

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    It would never occur to the Obama bureaucrats, to help American automakers by entering negotiations to unify such things as NHTSA "NMVSS" Crash ratings with the rest of the World's NCAP system.

    Or a myriad of other government-imposed regulations. That would make some government jobs redundant and superfluous, and save some money. We can't have that...

  14. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    38

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    I just dont get crash ratings and why people read over them like they are the be all as to why you would or wouldnt buy a car! I have never even batted a eye at what a car gets in a crash rating!

    What I would rather see is car makers spend more money on making tech that keeps these cars from getting in a crash in the first place!

    Im 37 years never been in a fender bender, never hit anything while driving, and if you never hit anything then these crash ratings are worthless!

    Its kind of like the trailer tow ratings of trucks, they just keep going up and up! Does anybody really know just how much in pounds a truck can haul or tow?

    Lastly there comes a point when during a crash if your going to die your going to die and there is nothing a crash rating can do about it!

  15. #14
    1.4 Liter Turbocharged ECOTEC Wagon of Fury's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    64

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    Quote Originally Posted by staspeterson View Post
    It would never occur to the Obama bureaucrats, to help American automakers by entering negotiations to unify such things as NHTSA "NMVSS" Crash ratings with the rest of the World's NCAP system.

    Or a myriad of other government-imposed regulations. That would make some government jobs redundant and superfluous, and save some money. We can't have that...
    Do you look at everything in terms of partisan politics ? If you are really that simple-minded, then try this - the current administration has been in place for about 16 months now. The previous administration had 8 years to do the same, and didn't. Where was your outrage then ?
    Current: Subaru WRX Wagon Of Fury
    Future: 2009 Pontiac G8 Wagon Of Fury ?

  16. #15
    4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    2,693

    Re: Regal Receives 5-Star Safety Rating In China

    Quote Originally Posted by chevyrules! View Post
    I just dont get crash ratings and why people read over them like they are the be all as to why you would or wouldnt buy a car! I have never even batted a eye at what a car gets in a crash rating!

    What I would rather see is car makers spend more money on making tech that keeps these cars from getting in a crash in the first place!

    Im 37 years never been in a fender bender, never hit anything while driving, and if you never hit anything then these crash ratings are worthless!

    Its kind of like the trailer tow ratings of trucks, they just keep going up and up! Does anybody really know just how much in pounds a truck can haul or tow?

    Lastly there comes a point when during a crash if your going to die your going to die and there is nothing a crash rating can do about it!
    I do not regard rating numbers as an absolute. But relatively speaking, if I am to be hit by another auto I would rather take my chances in a car rated 5 as opposed to 2 in terms of survivability. Also I am not a fatalist regarding dying. Hope you aren't saying that your chances of getting killed in a 35MPH crash are the same without belts and bags, energy absorbing crush protection and steel reinforcements... as with...are you?
    Last edited by goatgary; 04-29-2010 at 11:20 AM.

  17. Remove Advertisements
    GM Inside News
    Advertisements
     

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.2