![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
|
Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
Does anyone know if there are available cold air-intakes for the 06-07 Monte SS for the 5.3L V8. Also can anyone explain to me why the same motor that is in the Silverado / Tahoe outputs 320+ hp and the same engine in the Monte Carlo is toned down to 303? Also does anyone have any advice to pump up that output back to 320+hp. Would a new cpu chip or is it more in depth what GM does to tone down performance?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: British Columbia
Drives: 2006 Malibu Maxx SS
Posts: 783
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
see above....much more then this to the front wheels would not be cool....even the caddy has limited to the FWD models, with a 500CU motor...that is why the Impala is going RWD in 09 more power to the rear wheels and no torque steer.
__________________
"You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours. You want to claim this land as the land of the free? Then the symbol of your country cannot just be a flag. The symbol also has to be one of its citizens exercising his right to burn that flag in protest. Now show me that, defend that, celebrate that in your classrooms." |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,973
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
Quote:
Because it's facing east-west instead of north-south, and on top of a transmisson that can barely handle the hp/torque combo that even te de-tuned 5.3 has. Quick, name another 300+hp FWD non-GM car? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
Would you damage the transmission or engine by putting on new intake and catback system to boost power since it is fwd? or is it a waste of time to get better performance out of a fwd car. I saw some old 98-2002 grand prixs with fwd pushing 400hp(obviously with some mods), is that overkill then for fwd? In short i am interested in purchasing a 06-07 Monte SS, but i am trying to find out ways to increase HP without going crazy and breaking the bank? Has anyone seen any real numbers on performance as far as 0-60 or quarter mile for the monty?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando and Melbourne, FL
Drives: 1996 Buick Regal Custom 3800
Posts: 660
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
I believe some people have increased the HP on the 5.3, however I think the tranny is definitely a weak link that should be taken into consideration.
I would suggest that you check out the LS4 front drives section of LS1tech.com, http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=108 There are many who have modified the car there, you will probably get more response there, since that section specializes in the vehicles you are considering.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,973
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
The Monte Carlo SS hits 60 in about 5.5-5.7 seconds, with a top speed of about 156mph, darn fast if you ask me.
You can modify these cars, the problem is the tranmission, it really shortens the life span of the automatic, there are some companies that do sell re-built 4T65-E's with improved components for severe use. Maybe a GTO is more what you are looking for? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The garage usually
Drives: coupes
Posts: 492
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
The SS doesn't use the 4T65 found in most cars. It uses the 4T65-HD (for heavy duty in case ya didn't already guess that). It uses a bigger TC and stronger shafts and can handle more power than you might think.
__________________
1987 Monte Carlo SS Aerocoupe. 150,000 miles on L69 5.0 V8 -stock except the custom made dual snorkel intake 1996 Grand Prix GTP Special Edition. 140,000 miles on LQ1 3.4 DOHC 24valve -not exactly stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Huffman, Tx
Drives: 95 Chevy C1500
2003 Tahoe Z71
Posts: 1,011
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
Quote:
oh, and by the way, good choice of car!
__________________
Dream Ride: 2012 K4500 w/SFA Duramax (a la F450 fighter) 1995 Silverado 1/2 ton RC: 350/Auto 2003 Chevy Tahoe Z71 2004 Honda CRF450R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 4,085
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
Quote:
I have heard many people say that fwd cars put more power to the wheels but the reality is that even with identical engines the rwd car will put more power to the rear wheels because they always have better engine packaging which helps when it comes to intake and a more equal exhaust from one side to the other. That being said the W-Bodies do have a fair amount of torque management built in but I belive it has more to do with keeping a rookie driver safe more than anything. The first LS4 W-Bodies had a few torque converter problems that then killed the tranny but I haven't really heard of any issues since they fixed the torque converter. Listed below is just some of the improvements made to beef up this tranny to deal with the LS4: - 258mm, RI 15 Torque Converter - Enhanced Heavy Duty 3.29 Final Drive - 2.93 Effective Final Drive - Transmission case for transmission mounted starter - Net-formed Input Sun Gear - Ceramic bead Peened Final Drive Sun Gear - Input/Reaction Carrier Assembly ------ Contour Hardened ReactionInternal Gear ------ Input Carrier & Gear Asm. with lube grooves ------ Shot-peened, Black-oxided Input Carrier Pinions ------ Shot-peened Reaction Carrier Pinions - Shot-peened Final Drive Sun shanft - Upgraded Drive sprocket Thrust washers (new for high speed capability)
__________________
07' SS Monte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
Hey thanks guys for all info, greatly appreciated. One last Q? Does anyone know if it is true you lose your factory/GM warranty if something goes wrong with your car and you take it in and it has say a K&N c/a on it? I have heard different things, but my gm goodrench mechanic who really is more of good friend and hooks me up all the time said it depends on the mechanic working on your car. Like he told me if he was working on it, he wouldn't care, but if another guy was, they could report whatever damage you have to your car say tranny/engine and attribute it to your non stock air-intake mod. Anyone have any real facts on this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 4,498
|
Re: Monte Carlo SS 5.3L question?
Found this...
http://store.knfilters.com/warrantyletter.htm You could probably get a PCM "burn" to unlock performance. I'm certain that there's torque management in place to limit power going through the tranny. The 4T65-HD mostly just has a bigger differential. Evolved from the 4T60-E, from the 4T60, and from the 440-T4, created for 2.8L V6s. Wonder how many miles those 400hp 3800 guys can go without needing a rebuild. As mentioned, I think you need a GTO.
__________________
'07 Subaru Forester: Manual trans, shifts assisted by Momo '89 Buick Reatta: "Project GS"...3800 SII S/C, 6 speed manual...coming eventually '94 Buick Century wagon: 3100 V6, business vehicle Quote:
|
|
|
|
|