![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Del Mar/Rancho Santa Fe(San Diego),CA
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Posts: 1,147
|
Re: future small block Chevy lineup
Quote:
There is no reason an Exspensive Car can't have an Exspensive Engine in an Exspensive Brand.
__________________
You didn't come here to make a choice, you've already made it. You're here to try to understand why you made it. Current ride: just your typical 5.0L DOHC 2000 Mustang GT http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?...ubj=1356721448 |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 820
|
Re: future small block Chevy lineup
Quote:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=rzQ...m=4&dq=6505589 and here with 2 cam in block and DI (probably something similar to XV8 concept engine) http://www.google.com/patents?id=sjQ...505592#PPA4,M1 So it can be done. Question is will Gm do it..maybe they'll do normal 2v with DI LS engine for trucks, chevy, pontiac etc and special 3v DI for cadillac. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,765
|
Re: future small block Chevy lineup
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 85541
Drives: 6-GM, 1-Dodge, 1-Jeep, 1-Polaris, 1-Yamaha.
Posts: 2,764
|
Re: future small block Chevy lineup
The main benefit of DOHC engines is the abiilty for small-bore engines to breathe better and rev higher. The Ford Mod motors are an excellent example of how 3v and 4v heads will improve flow and make more power. The reason is the really small 90mm (3.54") bore. Larger valves are significantly shrouded by the cylinder walls and thus flow is limited.
On the Gen III/IV small blocks the head flow is amazing. There is a diminishing return to 3v and 4v heads with these engines. First, additional valves will flow too much at low rpm, decreasing efficiency, power and economy. Secondly, the horsepower gains on 6.0 and 6.2L engines would be met with a reduction in low-end torque. On high-end cars, 7.0L and up there maybe enough gains to develop a 3v head, but on smaller displacement engines current head designs support far more horsepower than most folks will ever utilize. The DI, VVT, and 6-speed transmissions are the next step.
__________________
Who is John Galt? - |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Apr 2004
Drives: 2005 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP
Posts: 542
|
Re: future small block Chevy lineup
Man, I'd LOVE to see a DI version of an LS engine. You could go with a smaller displacement (i.e. 5.3L) and have the same power (or more) as the LS3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Drives: 2007 Silverado 4x4
Posts: 7,629
|
Re: future small block Chevy lineup
I think the new CAFE standards will be the end of the small block in anything but the Vette.
__________________
Get your geek on in 2012! |
|
|
|