GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GM Holden News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2006, 12:03 AM   #1 (permalink)
GMI's Holden Moderator
 
JoeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Drives: 2003 Holden Monaro CV8
Posts: 4,854
Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

It's All About The Leg Room

Peter Barnwell
02 March 2006

www.carsguide.com.au

Holden wins the engine capacity war hands down with its massive 260kW/510Nm, 6.0-litre, V8 engine.

A replacement for the 5.7-litre Gen 3 the newcomer boasts more of everything V8 lovers love - power, torque, sound, response, feel, towability, bragging rights.

Ford's DOHC, 5.4-litre V8 pales against the sheer volume of the Holden donk. But there's a leveller - the Gen 4 Holden L76, 6.0-litre uses an old fashioned pushrod valve system and has only two valves a cylinder - not the most efficient layout in an era of ever improving engine technology striving for peak efficiency.

Holden reckons it gets by with this mechanically low-tech approach using sophisticated electronics and says a cylinder deactivation system was unnecessary to deliver reasonable fuel economy.

That's all very good but more and more V8 makers are moving towards these systems waiting for a breakthrough to cut fuel consumption in large capacity engines. What that will be is anyone's guess.

L76 was introduced to comply with the new AS79/01 emissions laws, Australia's version of Euro 3 regulations. Gen 3 V8 doesn't pass.

No doubt, Holden would have preferred to introduce the L76 to coincide with the new VE Commodore series but that's months away.

We got hold of the range-topping Caprice V8 fitted with the new V8 and it's difficult not to be impressed, even at $75,390.

The engine has a definite edge over the older donk offering more response, more mid-range and more top end while the fuel economy seems pretty much the same.

The four speed auto needs to be consigned to history as it is simply not cut it these days in the face of five and six speed 'boxes from rivals. It not the smoothest tranny by anyone's measure and is atb odds with the refined atmosphere insided Caprice.

That said, driving the big Holden is fun even around corners where its considerable weight doesn't seem matter too much.

It has a ridiculous amount of rear seat legroom and the boot is expansive if a little shallow.

As flagship of the range, Caprice is equipped with the full Holden inventory including dual rear DVD screens.

A number of controls are available to rear seat passengers.

But there's plenty of driver enjoyment to be had from this large limo.

The engine sounds powerful propelling the Caprice at sports car pace.

It's extremely comfortable inside but the dash looks like a tarted up Commodore item which it is.

The new engine likes a strong brew and functions best on premium unleaded thanks in part to a knock sensor and high compression ratio.

Fuel economy on test averaged around 14.5 litres/100km - impressive for a car this size.



JoeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-03-2006, 12:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
70 MPG Two Mode Saturn Hybrid
 
Bravada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 10,871
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Frankly speaking I don't care about the engine in a car provided it moves forward, but if Holden dropped the third side window and stretched the doors on the WIs to reach to the rear wheel arch and they've got the best-looking large sedan available!
Bravada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 12:10 AM   #3 (permalink)
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Colorado
Drives: '96 Tahoe, '93 4Runner
Posts: 101
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

I have a sneaking suspicion we'll be seeing that here...
ATPeele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 12:15 AM   #4 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Stormin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 565
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATPeele
I have a sneaking suspicion we'll be seeing that here...
Not that one. Maybe the VE model.
Stormin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 12:31 AM   #5 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
caprice 511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 424
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormin
Not that one. Maybe the VE model.
I don't care which one it is . I want it .
caprice 511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 01:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lower Alabama
Drives: 1997 Camaro 1968 Camaro(in the works)
Posts: 105
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

I bet my brother would LOVE that car compared to his Crown Vic as a police cruiser.
__________________
Rides:
1997 Camaro (With absolutly no options)
1968 Camaro (in the process of restoring)
With 1996 F-body LT1
Zujin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 02:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
Mikkoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: An American living in Finland
Posts: 1,783
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by caprice 511
I don't care which one it is . I want it .
As Holden is in charge of large RWD platform development for GM, I think
there will be a version coming stateside. It might just be the Buick
Statesman that Lutz has mentioned this week in Geneva.
__________________
Previously owned Camaro's ;
1971
1973 RS
1977 Z28
1980 Z28
1982 Z28
1998
2000 Z28

Previously owned Corvette;
1988

Future ride;
2008 Corvette. 6spd manual, with Jetstream blue metallic paint.

Last edited by Mikkoo : 03-03-2006 at 02:22 AM.
Mikkoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 03:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
jzEllis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 866
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bravada
Frankly speaking I don't care about the engine in a car provided it moves forward, but if Holden dropped the third side window and stretched the doors on the WIs to reach to the rear wheel arch and they've got the best-looking large sedan available!
rear doors lines that run right into the wheel well radius give off a definate feel of "cheapness" in the overall design language; at least to hear industrial design teachers tell it.
jzEllis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 05:36 AM   #9 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
PontiacPIMP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Drives: 1998 Pontiac Firebird
Posts: 145
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Looks like it has the outgoing Impala's headlights.
PontiacPIMP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 06:47 AM   #10 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
jwrebholz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Drives: 2001 Chevy Cavalier
Posts: 1,588
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Quote:

...the Gen 4 Holden L76, 6.0-litre uses an old fashioned pushrod valve system and has only two valves a cylinder - not the most efficient layout in an era of ever improving engine technology striving for peak efficiency...


...more and more V8 makers are moving towards these (cylinder deactivation) systems waiting for a breakthrough to cut fuel consumption in large capacity engines. What that will be is anyone's guess.
Then later on...

Quote:
Fuel economy on test averaged around 14.5 litres/100km - impressive for a car this size.
...WHAT?! You blast the engine for poor efficiency, then go on to say it's got great fuel economy.

Methinks the guy who wrote this doesn't know WTF he's talking about. Also, I felt the writeup was poorly-done as a whole.
__________________
Secret member of the VAST RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY. (Ssh! Don't tell anybody!)


jwrebholz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 07:27 AM   #11 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
dygituljunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA, USA
Drives: $1 Ford Escort Wagon
Posts: 165
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zujin
I bet my brother would LOVE that car compared to his Crown Vic as a police cruiser.
With or without longer rear doors, I think it's ridiculous that I have to drive a FWD car with a 3800 engine under the hood. Even though it's a good power match for the Impala, the wheels just don't stick to the pavement when you accelerate and turn at the same time. And getting it to actually GO is a matter of gas pedal voodoo.

For a US police car, the VZ Commodore is too small but the VZ Caprice would be very nice indeedy. I can't wait to see the Chevy Zeta 4dr since it will probably end up being Chevy's police package... and the long wheelbase Zeta is even more enticing...

Giggity giggity giggity!!!

dygituljunky
__________________
What GMNA should be:

Chevy: everyman vehicles with some fringe models
Buick: pampered-not-pompous personal luxury
Saturn: American Opel (model for model)
Saab: Euro-luxury
Caddy: pompous flashy mall-bling luxury. "I'm rich and you know it."
GMC: T-rucks, aka: General Motors Commercial.
HUMMER: Jeep-fighter. Trail-crawlers not blingin mall-crawlers.
Pontiac: serious high performance that makes boys drool and cops itch .
dygituljunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 07:33 AM   #12 (permalink)
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2009 Acura TSX
Posts: 2,632
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Holden has some nice looking cars. Just like Saturn is making a deal with Opel, maybe Holden should supply more cars to Pontiac and Buick
kenman923 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 07:34 AM   #13 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
dygituljunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta, GA, USA
Drives: $1 Ford Escort Wagon
Posts: 165
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

Quote:
Originally Posted by PontiacPIMP
Looks like it has the outgoing Impala's headlights.
Far from it.

The higher-end VZ cars, including this Caprice, have projector beam lowbeams, reflector high beams, the small white driving lights you see lit next to the low beams, and turn signals.

The outgoing Impala had reflector low beams, reflector highbeams, and reflector turnsignal/parking lights. Actually, for the price point, the old Impala's headlight assemblies looked pretty nice.

I can't wait to see what the VE headlights are gonna look like. 'Course, the US Zetas will probably different.

dygituljunky
__________________
What GMNA should be:

Chevy: everyman vehicles with some fringe models
Buick: pampered-not-pompous personal luxury
Saturn: American Opel (model for model)
Saab: Euro-luxury
Caddy: pompous flashy mall-bling luxury. "I'm rich and you know it."
GMC: T-rucks, aka: General Motors Commercial.
HUMMER: Jeep-fighter. Trail-crawlers not blingin mall-crawlers.
Pontiac: serious high performance that makes boys drool and cops itch .
dygituljunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 07:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
FordFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,049
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

they just need to fix the **************** handling and the heating issues, Holden won't be seeing my money unless they start making quality cars.
FordFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 09:09 AM   #15 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
MBHockey13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Greensboro, NC (Buffalonian For Life with a 3 year stop in Philly)
Drives: 2002 Acura RSX 5-Speed 1994 Subaru Loyale 4WD Wag
Posts: 334
Re: Review: 2006 Holden Caprice L76 6.0L

This post just p*sses me off because that Holden Caprice should be sold here as the Chevrolet Caprice. THIS is the GM car of the past that I love. WHY CAN'T CHEVYs LOOK LIKE THAT?
MBHockey13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GM Holden News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.