GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GM Holden News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-2008, 01:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
GMI's Holden Moderator
 
JoeT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wollongong, Australia
Drives: 2003 Holden Monaro CV8
Posts: 4,729
60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

Test drive: Holden's First Car

Tony Davis
14 March 2008
www.drive.com.au

It's sixty years since the first Holden rolled off the production line. Tony Davis test drives the car that launched the Australian motor industry.

As road tests go, it wasn't ideal. I was restricted to closed roads around factory buildings with the nervous "owner" sitting next to me watching every move.

It was more a case of exploring his limits rather than the vehicle's - "slow down" and "stop here, someone's walking out!" were favourite expressions - but it was still a magical experience.

Why? Because it involved what is possibly the most valuable Australian motor vehicle in existence, the car that Holden calls Old Number One.

It's the very machine a starched-looking Ben Chifley stood beside in November 1948, clutching his hat and declaring in one of those curiously English-sounding, squeaky black-and-white Australian voices: "Good luck to the Holden car and good luck to all that ride therein."

It was the very Gawler cream-coloured sedan that launched a successful Australian motor industry. Nobody else had wholly manufactured a unique car here as anything other than a short prelude to bankruptcy.

Click here to continue article



My VE Commodore Omega Review

Isszy
13 March 2008
www.gminsidenews.com

The car in question is a 2007 Commodore Omega from Thrifty car rentals. It has just over 15,000km on the clock. It is part of our family until my wife's car comes back from the panel beaters.

My first impression of the car was clouded by the fact that they delivered it 2 hours late and so I was late for work.

Anyway, the car seemed noisy compared with my Berlina, and the handling seemed really sloppy. A quick stop at a servo showed that the right rear had about 12psi in it, so I pumped them all up to 38psi and the handling and ride improved dramatically.

The rear window is really small, and most of the view in the rear view mirror seems to be pillar. It did not take long to get used to though.

I know this is the base model, but the plastics seemed dull and hard, and look like they would attract dust. Now after a few days I am getting used to it, but I like the VY interior much better. The run to work (about 15km in suburban traffic) was uneventful, and I could have been driving just about anything.

To add some spice, I took a lunch break the next day up Mountain Highway from The Basin to Olinda. This is a nice windy mountain road about 10km long, where I spent many a night driving to put my kids to sleep when they were babies – they liked the car and usually went to sleep when all else failed.

Click here to continue article




You've come a long way baby! 1948 Holden 48-215 (FX) and 2008 VE Commodore Omega

Last edited by JoeT : 03-14-2008 at 01:29 AM.
JoeT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-14-2008, 01:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
redimpss5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,617
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore Omega

Very British looking. Probably had a small 4 in it. Good looking, but WOW...they have made major improvements!! Send them here!!
redimpss5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 02:49 AM   #3 (permalink)
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
 
growler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Drives: Magna 3.5L of torque steer
Posts: 84
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore Omega

Quote:
Originally Posted by redimpss5 View Post
Very British looking. Probably had a small 4 in it. Good looking, but WOW...they have made major improvements!! Send them here!!
No it had a small six in in. Australian's have never really been big on small fours, even now the best selling car is the commodore with either a 3.6 v6 of 6.0 v8
growler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 08:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
aball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Nowra, Australia
Posts: 158
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore Omega

Quote:
Originally Posted by growler View Post
Australian's have never really been big on small fours, even now the best selling car is the commodore with either a 3.6 v6 of 6.0 v8
Except when the Corolla outsells from time to time
aball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 02:20 PM   #5 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marion, South Australia
Posts: 573
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore Omega

Quote:
Originally Posted by aball View Post
Except when the Corolla outsells from time to time
The Corolla is a "shoe box" compared with the interior space of a V6 Commodore

Mike

Last edited by mmciau : 03-14-2008 at 02:21 PM. Reason: Keyboard can't spel
mmciau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 02:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Buick61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC Metro Area
Drives: 58 Belvedere; 61 LeSabre; 96 Fleetwood; 07 SRX
Posts: 8,146
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

God, were Holdens ever up-to-date with their designs?
__________________
Used to own:

1959 Cadillac Series 62, 1960 AMC Rambler Six,
1998 Chevrolet Malibu, 2000 Saturn LS2,
2005 Chrysler 300C, 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP
Buick61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 02:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Drives: 1995 Pontiac Trans Am 1995 Buick LeSabre
Posts: 1,039
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

I prefer the BAS of the '48 Pontiac.

__________________
1995 Pontiac Trans Am LT1 5.7L (retired for winter)
1995 Buick LeSabre 3800
Gone: 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3400
Gone: 1997 Chevrolet S-10 4x4 4.3L
Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 02:37 PM   #8 (permalink)
GMI Fixed Ops Contributor
 
GMCSonoma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: behind the parts counter
Drives: 31MPG '98 Park Avenue; 21MPG '93 Roadmaster
Posts: 8,463
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

The 1948 Holden reminds me of a Buick!
__________________
certified GM Dealer Parts Manager since 1994
GM Dealer Parts employee since 1987
AMC-Jeep-Renault Dealer Parts employee 1987-90
holder of many GM accredations, too numerous to list

Last edited by GMCSonoma : 03-14-2008 at 03:29 PM.
GMCSonoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 02:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Buick61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC Metro Area
Drives: 58 Belvedere; 61 LeSabre; 96 Fleetwood; 07 SRX
Posts: 8,146
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

In 1948 the junior GM cars were in the last year of the pre-war bodystyles, while Cadillac and the senior Buicks already swiched to the new body style. Studebaker, Hudson, Kaiser-Fraiser, Tucker (heh), they were all new by 1948.

This was, what I presume to be, a clean slate Holden design. Why debut looking old?
__________________
Used to own:

1959 Cadillac Series 62, 1960 AMC Rambler Six,
1998 Chevrolet Malibu, 2000 Saturn LS2,
2005 Chrysler 300C, 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP
Buick61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 03:20 PM   #10 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Frankster177's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 192
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

The first Holden is actually based on a pre war deseign for a small chevy.

Holden did have a clean slate design but this was cheaper.

Must some of you have a go at anything Holden?
sheeesh.
__________________
Only turkeys have right wings.
Frankster177 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 03:30 PM   #11 (permalink)
GMI Fixed Ops Contributor
 
GMCSonoma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: behind the parts counter
Drives: 31MPG '98 Park Avenue; 21MPG '93 Roadmaster
Posts: 8,463
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankster177 View Post
Must some of you have a go at anything Holden?
sheeesh.

Not me...I like Holdens!!!
__________________
certified GM Dealer Parts Manager since 1994
GM Dealer Parts employee since 1987
AMC-Jeep-Renault Dealer Parts employee 1987-90
holder of many GM accredations, too numerous to list

Last edited by GMCSonoma : 03-14-2008 at 03:32 PM.
GMCSonoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2008, 06:49 PM   #12 (permalink)
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
 
SpaceCowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Richmond, Victoria
Drives: 1996 Holden VSII Calais V6
Posts: 99
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

The thing to remember about the 48/215 is that it was designed to be affordable transport for the masses so it utilised a borrowed Chev design and was built to be a low cost car for Australian families.

The FJ update which followed featured a revised grille (similar to the one used on the Efijy concept which was meant to be a 21st interpretation of the FJ, you can see what I mean in my avatar) to take some of the utilitarian look out of the car, and each model that followed was more up to date.

A lot of cars released in the late 1940s were simply a continuation of pre war designs which simply underwent final validation before being put into production.

Its a car thats held in high esteem here in Australia and is quite possibly kick started the idea of building cars that were designed and engineered here, as opposed to just assembled here.
__________________
A recipe for success: Take one forty year old all-iron pushrod V6, team it with a dog of a four-speed auto from an SUV and send the power to a rear axle suspended by a linkage set-up long forgotten about by Datsun and what do you have? Australia's number one selling car for a decade and a half. Don't ever let any one tell you GM don't know what they're doing with all that old school tech.
Enjoy more positive insights into the inane side of life at Interpret This
SpaceCowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 02:36 AM   #13 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
AndrewGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spring, TX, MX (Houston)
Drives: 1986 Ford RS200 EVO
Posts: 6,762
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

Appropriately it looks like an earlier Chevy with a Buick grille.

Happy 60th Holden!
__________________
Andrew - MySpace - KD5FHW


1995 Buick Roadmaster Limited - LT1, 4L60E, 2.93 Gears, 260HP, 4,200LBS, 15.4SEC 1/4-MI, 20MPG
2005 Chevrolet Silverado C1500 LS - LM7, 4L60E, 3.73 Gears, 300HP, 4,200LBS, 15.0SEC 1/4-MI, 19.0MPG

"Gas mileage is fine, but keep in mind, the first question any car buyer asks themselves is, 'Will this get me laid?'"
AndrewGS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 04:10 AM   #14 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Drives: 1995 Pontiac Trans Am 1995 Buick LeSabre
Posts: 1,039
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankster177 View Post
The first Holden is actually based on a pre war deseign for a small chevy.

Holden did have a clean slate design but this was cheaper.

Must some of you have a go at anything Holden?
sheeesh.
I was joking hence the winking fellow after my sentence.
__________________
1995 Pontiac Trans Am LT1 5.7L (retired for winter)
1995 Buick LeSabre 3800
Gone: 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3400
Gone: 1997 Chevrolet S-10 4x4 4.3L
Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2008, 05:04 AM   #15 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marion, South Australia
Posts: 573
Re: 60th Anniversary Review: 1948 Holden 48-215 vs 2008 Holden Commodore

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaceCowboy View Post
The thing to remember about the 48/215 is that it was designed to be affordable transport for the masses so it utilised a borrowed Chev design and was built to be a low cost car for Australian families.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpaceCowboy View Post

The FJ update which followed featured a revised grille (similar to the one used on the Efijy concept which was meant to be a 21st interpretation of the FJ, you can see what I mean in my avatar) to take some of the utilitarian look out of the car, and each model that followed was more up to date.

A lot of cars released in the late 1940s were simply a continuation of pre war designs which simply underwent final validation before being put into production.

Its a car thats held in high esteem here in Australia and is quite possibly kick started the idea of building cars that were designed and engineered here, as opposed to just assembled here.


My mother's 48-215 was a rusted-out rocket that went like the clappers!!!!

It was the early "knee-action" shock absorbers built into the top wishbone/upper mounting point. It had a massive hand formed anti-roll bar that was affixed within the lower front wishbones. You could rag out a set of 5-90 x 15 Cross Ply tyres in a very short period of time.

It was rusted out across the front foot-well adjacent to the gearbox demountable hatch. The under door sills were full of bog.

The body twisted so badly when cornering hard that the front doors would fly open - "it almost rubbed the door handles on the bitumen!!!!!"

It was started by the famous 6 volt system, it was 'cammed", it was capable of being "double declutched at 40 mph into bottom gear", it was expertedly repainted a two-tone green by the previous owner with a course-haired broom, and the handbrake handle was the best place for mum to hang her handbag.

Parking on steep incline/declines meant driving the front wheel into the gutter or placing the 9" red brick behind a wheel!!!

And two hard applications on the brakes meant that you'd better have a lot of faith in the gearbox to slow you down!!

And above all, it was a much loved means of family transport. It's final goodbye was felt by all as you thought you'd parted with an integral member of the family. It is a fond memory1

Then I got the FJ ute!!

Mike
mmciau is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GM Holden News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.