![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,641
|
G8 V6 review
![]() Be warned: It ain't a happy review. Quote:
Like they said, it would be nice if the G8's V6 powertrain was the same as the Camaro |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 124
|
Re: G8 V6 review
A car that's heavier, larger in wheelbase, length and width uses more fuel than a mid sized car which is smaller and much lighter.....how ironic. The G8 sedan is more of a family car. It's decent all round and soon should be given the DI V6 which will make it more powerful and refined. Either way the GT is a better choice if you want a performer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 346
|
Re: G8 V6 review
If it makes anyone feel better... the BMW 528i does 7.1 seconds 0-60 mph mark and costs about $46K
The Charger V6 gets almost 9.3secs Point is that any one of these cars are pretty much too heavy for a V6 under 300HP, but they are i existence to have something in that particular make that gets better fuel economy than their HI-PO versions are able to make... EACH one of these cars has a mid-level version that does amazing things as far as performance... the 5series... the 535... the G8.. the GT... the Charger... the R/T.. and EACH one of them has a even more power exclusive version that takes it further...
__________________
2008 C6 Z51 NPP 3LT 436HP 2005 STS 4.6L 320HP 2007 Tahoe LTZ 320HP 2006 G6 3.5L 201HP 2005 9-3 Aero 250HP = 1527HP in my Garage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 159
|
Re: G8 V6 review
..."relaxed suspension tune"??? I thought the V6 had the same suspension as the GT...
__________________
2005 GMC Sierra SLT Z-71 - SOLD 2002 Olds Intrigue GLS 1996 Chevy Beretta Z26 2007 Honda Odyssey EX-L...no more GM minivans lead me here
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto area
Posts: 2,052
|
Re: G8 V6 review
I want a G8 - V6 and I would buy one today if they has a reasonable finance deal on the car. The 6.5% (market rate) currently available kills the deal for me, especially when the Canadian MSRP is thousands more than in the U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Drives: 2005 GrandAm GT Coupe
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
Maybe next year? I'm going to take a G8 V6 out for a test drive this Saturday just to see what it is like. It is one of the vehicles I'm considering. The other is a G6 GT Coupe. I'd really like a G8 Coupe with the Camaro's V6. It would be perfect! Nick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Drives: 2005 GrandAm GT Coupe
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
Nick |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Travis AFB, CA
Posts: 1,031
|
Re: G8 V6 review
This is funny. There is nothing wrong with 7.6 0-60 for a family sedan. And that's what the V6 G8 is. So the Accord, Camry, and Altima V6's are faster, but they look boring, and drive the front wheels.
Ehhh, but then again look what happened to the Cadillac Catera.
__________________
- 1971 Cadillac Coupe DeVille, 110k miles - 2006 Nissan Armada 4x4, 27k miles - 1993 Toyota Camry I4 AT, 179k miles - 2007 Coachmen 19flb travel trailer - 2007 Regal 1900 boat: 225 hp FI V6 (GM 4.3) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: U.S.A!!!
Drives: 08' Lancer Evo MR
Posts: 1,558
|
Re: G8 V6 review
Quote:
It will most likely get the Camaro's V6 before long. Which it should its a better engine.
__________________
-JD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: U.S.A!!!
Drives: 08' Lancer Evo MR
Posts: 1,558
|
Re: G8 V6 review
Quote:
__________________
-JD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | ||
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver
Drives: 2005 CTS 3.6,
2005 Envoy
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: G8 V6 review
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,854
|
Re: G8 V6 review
Quote:
My thoughts exactly, when did 7.6 seconds become "slow"? Try 15 seconds to 60, thats slow. What I would do is offer the 6 speed manual in the V6, if they offer it in the Camaro, they should at least make it possible to buy a 6 speed manual V6 G8, although offering something like that would make the G8 something unique as there would be no other RWD manual transmission full size sedan in the sub 30K bracket. Though adding DI, maybe as an option, would be pretty cool too, even if the bump is only up to the Camaros 300hp, not the CTS 304(306?)hp, a combination of adding the DI V6 and the 6 speed manual would make the G8 and even sweeter deal. Also, offering NAV in this price range, at least as an option, is kind of a given, blah blah blah, turn by turn, etc etc, yeah sure, but some people just want a screen, give it to them. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|