![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#91 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 495
|
Re: Chevy Traverse First Drive
could gm at least put different seats in the lambdas. they all have the same one
__________________
Current Cars: 2008 Chevrolet Corvette Manual, 99 Red Firebird Manual- Brother 2007 SAAB 9-3 2.0T- Me 2006 Cadillac STS 3.6- Mom 2008 Subaru WRX STI /1999 Black Pontiac Firebird- other Brother 2003 Cadillac Deville Northstar- Dad Past Cars: 2004 Cadillac CTS 3.6- Me-----> SOLD 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GT- Given to aunt 1994 GMC Safari- Sold 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- Donated |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#92 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6,154
|
Re: Chevy Traverse First Drive
Quote:
Coming to your point, the reason a FEW people gave Hyundai a second chance is because at least there was some reasonable FOCUSED marketing taking place to go along with their new (much) improved product. That is not the case with GM. Not only do their brands lack focus, but their advertising is absolutely second rate. Plus, the advertising is sporadic. They push one brand/vehicle, then they totally quit and move to another brand and so on. This is their primary problem - the inability to manage all their brands effectively. The CTS is an example of what can happen when you have a well known brand with a good product supported by solid advertising. Yes, unions, market conditions are all issues.....but ultimately, GM's current predicament comes down to management. Was there a solution in all this? Absolutely there was. Did management make all the right decisions over the past few years? No. They fixed product to a certain extent, but again, that's the obvious decision that they were forced to make in the face of competition. But that's about it. In terms of market positioning, long term strategy.......we see nothing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Drives: 1997 Mazda B2300 5-spd.
Posts: 614
|
Re: Chevy Traverse First Drive
Just not feelin that. The Edge's proportions are just Way too tall and bubbly for me, not sporty at all. The Flex looks more like an old style wagon and has more car-like proportions for me. Plus I believe it has more space and some cool features. Just my perspective though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 (permalink) | |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 279
|
Re: Chevy Traverse First Drive
Quote:
... That being said, this will be the first certified home run from the Lambdas. It's the best looking and it's the only one that looks like it was designed for the brand it was made, with a cohesive interior and exterior strategy, which is funny since it's the last out of the gate. They've done well so far, but not at the volumes necessary. I hope they're ready to shift capacity to the Traverse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 (permalink) |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 279
|
Re: Chevy Traverse First Drive
They've already spent the money on 'rebadges' for Buick and Saturn and GMC in this case. That's where the frustration lies. The Traverse should have come out first along with the Enclave, and that's it. Instead they spent x amount of dollars on all 4 brands when they only needed 2.
|
|
|
|