![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Detroit, MI
Drives: 1999 Lincoln Continental
2004 CTS
Posts: 750
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
it's pretty fair.
Honestly I would've put the Escalade up against the benz, but i think chevy wasn't put to shame, rather complimented by this comparision
__________________
99 Lincoln Continental 04 Cadillac CTS 3.6 Luxury/ Infotainment |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 2,737
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
I don't like how he said the Mercedes would last longer. GM's Vortec drivetrains last forever. And in hybrid form it would be even better.
One thing I really don't like about the Tahoe hybrid (other than the ugly wheels and stickers) is how low the front end is. Yes I know if for aerodynamics, but I wish they would make it motorized or something so you can pull it up when you actually are using it as a truck. And really I wish they would do that for the regular Tahoe as well.
__________________
Last edited by I-Love-Pontiac : 04-21-2008 at 10:34 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Level I Members
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 699
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Utah
Drives: 2007 Aura XR
Posts: 323
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
As far as diesels lasting longer it is probably generally true but they are also generally more expensive than gasoline engines. The blanket statement about diesels versus hybrids is a different matter. Any technology that can capture braking energy and store it for improvement of economy of any type of ICE shouldn't be discounted, regardless of size of vehicle. There are already hybrid diesel buses and we will only see more applications of different types of hybrid technologies to all size vehicles.
__________________
2008 Avalanche LTZ 2007 Aura XR One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man. - Elbert Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Mar 2006
Drives: 1984 Kawasaki KZ700
Posts: 276
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
I think its fair...the Tahoe hybrid doesn't seem to make much sense, given its price tag. And I am skeptical that the hybrid powertrain will be trouble-free for any length of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,663
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
Quote:
The Tahoe 2-mode 6.0 liter V8 has variable valve timing, uses the Atkinson combustion cycle (shorter valve time on intake than exhaust, and this is the first engine GM has made with that technology that I know of), and has a new electrical system and very special transmission that combines aspects of a continually variable transmissions (CVT) with a traditional 4 speed automatic. I'm sure GM put a lot of work into the Two Mode powertrain. But I still wouldn't be surprised if some bugs pop up, it's a new technology for them. And I'm not singling out GM either. Even now, I would trust the reliability of a Toyota Corolla over a Prius or a Honda Civic over a Civic hybrid. Of course, I was under the impression that modern Mercedes' break all of the time anyway. So that's a mark in GM's favor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: People's Republic of California
Drives: 2007 Tahoe LT,
1987 Buick Grand National
Posts: 1,342
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
Of course, most of the people who would buy the diesel Benz live in California...A state where it's not even available.
How about comparing the Hybrid Tahoe to something people can actually buy everywhere?
__________________
"Beware of the leopard." --Douglas Adams 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe LT 1987 Buick Grand National: Alky drinker! 1977 Camaro LT: Vortec 4800 with 4L80-E |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 33
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
I think that conveniently forgetting that the Mercedes is a buttload more expensive is just not fair. The Tahoe should get points for being much less expensive and 50-state legal. You can buy a lot of gasoline for $14,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Level I Members
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 699
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
2009 Benz in 50 state legal. Plus it is not 14k. Starting price is about the same. Now if you get options it is more expensive. But if you get escalade hybrid it will probably be more expensive then benz.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,666
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
No the price isn't the same. If you get the same options on both vehicles the Benz is far more expensive. Edmunds said it the article they could have gotten GL for the same price as the Tahoe but it would have had next to no options.
__________________
Darc Requiem President of the Buick Loadmaster Fan Club |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Drives: 1991 Nissan 300zx TT
Posts: 388
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
Quote:
With the Caddy Hybrid coming, we get to see how the 6.2L performs. I hope to see a rematch seeing as this would be a direct competitor. Some of the complaints of luxury and what not should go away. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In front of my computer
Drives: 2006 HHR
2002 Corolla-Before I saw the light
Posts: 7,599
|
Re: Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid vs. Mercedez-Benz Gl320 CDI
I come from a diesel powertrain loving country. Where diesel is cheaper than gasoline by tons.
I can tell you two things.. #1. Diesels do not last longer than gasoline engines, they die quickly and suck, especially as they age.. it takes them for ever to get up to speed when they age, and if for some reason, you loose compression, you are in deep dudu, dead turbos, almost always mean, you will never get back to the same performance you had before turbos died #2. Diesel in So Cal is always much more expensive than Gasoline. So, you may get 2 mpg more, but it cost you more to get there
__________________
Before Understanding comes Faith
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|