![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#151 (permalink) | |
|
News Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 9,296
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Quote:
__________________
Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM. Current Cars: 2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4 2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6 1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6 Former Cars: 1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles) 1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles) Future Car: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#152 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 389
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Have you sat in the third row of an RX? Reason I ask is they do not have a third row.
I do agree though, this vehicle is fine without a third row. The RX and MKX do not have a third-row, especially if Caddy gets a lambda CUV (Escalade or otherwise) to upsell to. I do question why it is on a separate platform from the 'Nox - people will assume they're the same platform anyway (I don't know how many times I have seen people assume the FX is a Murano, the EX is a Rogue, the GS is an Avalon, etc, etc, etc) and given the uncertainty of Pontiac, Saturn, and SAAB having the 'Nox share the platform would seem to have made sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#153 (permalink) | |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,784
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Quote:
There are tons of other factors involved in how long a vehicle last such as how its driven and other maintenance done on it. like I said with oil based motor oils it doesn't make a difference if you change at 3,000 miles or say 7,000 miles except you will be spending more money. Im willing to bet that you being someone who changes your oil every 3,000 miles is also going to be good on other maintenance things as well. Me however Id rather save the money that I would otherwise be spending doing oil changes every 3,000 miles and use it on other things (I know oil and filters do not cost that much). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#154 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Drives: 1984 Pontiac Bonneville
Posts: 368
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
So with the FWD choice and hp numbers starting at around 300, are we looking at the return of torque steer with a few mods beyond stock?
__________________
Pontiac: Now I'm daily Driving Excitement with history! Holden, please give us compelling product in NA again, soon ![]() Member of The: I will never buy a Japanese car in my life Club |
|
|
|
|
|
#155 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Old Miltia
Posts: 6,539
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
The interior is a little plain, other than that it looks very very nice, I like it.
I didn't know that HFV6 can do E85, can we get that engine in more cars?
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) (")_(") Down with the Anti-Smokers Nazis! Government stay away from my high-fructose corn syrup! ![]() Member of The:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chicagoland
Drives: 2008 impala SS 5.3 V8
2002 Suburban 5.3 Vortec
Posts: 226
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
i was speaking in general with all their crossovers, before the world economy went down the drain CUV's were a very hot item. As much room as an SUV with better Fuel economy, people ate it up. The economy will come back some day and with it a pent-up demand for Automobiles, By that time GM it seems should have 3 very competitive offerings in the Equinox, SRX and the Terrain. That is how they are ahead of the curve.
Last edited by ChevyRules : 01-04-2009 at 10:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#157 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,460
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 (permalink) | |
|
News Contributor
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 9,296
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Quote:
__________________
Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM. Current Cars: 2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4 2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6 1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6 Former Cars: 1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles) 1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles) Future Car: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 (permalink) | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,460
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Quote:
Quote:
Quick note.. the S/C Northstar makes 443HP in the XLR and 469HP in the STS-V... I still maintain that the Northstar is the hold up on the 3.6L getting more power.. Check this out.. they have the 260HP 3.0LDi, but PLEASE tell me that the 3.6L is getting a boost to the 330HP range to compete better against the VQ 3.7L. I have seen the numbers from a better breathing 3.6L Di CTS... and it goes all the way to 350HP with minimal changes to the intake and exhaust. After that.. GM needs that 3.0L Turbo we've been hearing about here... with 420HP as an alternative to not having a V8 in the car. Here's a CHART from D3 showing the 3.6LDi with more power: Check this one out... D3 Concepts took a CTS 3.6L Di (always remember that a average loss in HP is 15% from Flywheel to Rear Wheels... hence a 304HP engine divided by 1.15= 264HP) Baseline run: vehicle produced 263.0 rwhp and 241.7 lbs/tq. Adding the new Corsa Exhaust power jumped to 281.1 rwhp and 255.3 lbs/tq. for an increase of 18.1 rwhp and 13.6 lbs/tq ![]() Added their intake system and power jumped to 294.2 rwhp and 261.3 lbs/tq for an increase of 13.1 rwhp and 6.0 lbs/tq. Total gain in power was 31.2 rwhp and 19.6 lbs/tq. from just an intake and exhaust. ![]() MEANING: That they took a 304HP (at the Fly) 3.6LDi and boosted it to 340HP with the Exhaust and Intake MOD..... using the same formula.. with JUST THE INTAKE and no exhaust mod.. the 304HP 3.6L would be boosted to 320HP (Northstar) anyone??? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#161 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Drives: 2003 Saturn VUE AWD
2007 Saturn ION 3 Quad Coupe
Posts: 139
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Maybe its just me. But I think, The Equinox looks better. Equinox seems to pay more attention to little details. Interior looks more bold on the Equinox.
And from the pictures I have seen, looks like the Nox got chrome mirrors and the SRX has body color. Maybe thats an option for both. And from some reason the SRX grille looks like it was flatted down too much. Have to see it in person tho to get a real perspective on both.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#162 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,460
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Quote:
I think ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 (permalink) | |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 5,304
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Quote:
I looked at him like he was mental and checked the oil. He was down so low it didn't even register on the car. I told him to put some oil into it. The genius drove it to a quick lube place where they "emptied" the engine -- less than a litre of oil. They told him they were surprised the engine hadn't seized. He mentioned that Japanese cars would never have required an oil change. After the guys at the lube joint stopped laughing they asked when his last oil change was. They couldn't believe his answer but did inform him that if it was a Japanese car it, too, would require oil changes and that he was lucky the car's engine hadn't turned into a puddle of metal. He is now rather quiet about complaining about his Saturn, instead he says he'll buy Japanese next time because GM won't be around next time he needs a car. I told him with the way he "pampers" that Saturn, he'll need a new car come April and GM will still be around come April .People know so little about cars it's scary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Drives: 1997 Mazda B2300 5-spd.
Posts: 1,322
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Looks pretty good for a "cuv". Was hoping it would have a lower/sportier stance (like that last SRX) but I guess that's not what's in demand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#165 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saginaw Michigan
Drives: 2004 Impala
2007 Silverado
Posts: 784
|
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX
Wow this thing is gorgeous! I think its the best looking SUV I've ever seen.
Kudos to Cadillac!
__________________
2007 Chevy Silverado 2004 Chevy Impala 1999 Pontiac Trans Am Convertible - Gone but never forgotten..... 2010 Camaro V6 - near future. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|