GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Autoshow Coverage
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2009, 04:05 PM   #151 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 9,296
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by 63GrandSport001 View Post
The color of the oil isn't an indication of how much life is left in it yet if your oil was still very clean it could indicate that there is a problem with the oil filter.

I have a 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix and I use synthetic motor oil in it which based on my car needs to be changed after about 10,000 miles.

If you are using oil based motor oil then changing at 3,000 miles is ok but you are just throwing away money at that point. Never has the 3,000 mile oil change been needed but was pushed by a company like jiffylube who change oil way back. If you use synthetics though some synthetics work best after 3,000 miles and you would be doing more harm to your engine by changing it every 3,000 miles then you would if you changed it every lets say 7,000 miles.
I don't know. The two former vehicles listed in my sig lasted that long with 3,000 mile oil/filter changes...must be doing something right.
__________________


Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM.
Current Cars:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4
2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6
1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6
Former Cars:
1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles)
1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles)
Future Car:
2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6
FenwickHockey65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-04-2009, 04:07 PM   #152 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 389
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by goblue View Post
The third row of the MDX, Highlander, RX, etc are not safe.
Have you sat in the third row of an RX? Reason I ask is they do not have a third row.

I do agree though, this vehicle is fine without a third row. The RX and MKX do not have a third-row, especially if Caddy gets a lambda CUV (Escalade or otherwise) to upsell to.

I do question why it is on a separate platform from the 'Nox - people will assume they're the same platform anyway (I don't know how many times I have seen people assume the FX is a Murano, the EX is a Rogue, the GS is an Avalon, etc, etc, etc) and given the uncertainty of Pontiac, Saturn, and SAAB having the 'Nox share the platform would seem to have made sense.
SullyND is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 04:12 PM   #153 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,784
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
I don't know. The two former vehicles listed in my sig lasted that long with 3,000 mile oil/filter changes...must be doing something right.
were they on synthetic?

There are tons of other factors involved in how long a vehicle last such as how its driven and other maintenance done on it.

like I said with oil based motor oils it doesn't make a difference if you change at 3,000 miles or say 7,000 miles except you will be spending more money.

Im willing to bet that you being someone who changes your oil every 3,000 miles is also going to be good on other maintenance things as well.

Me however Id rather save the money that I would otherwise be spending doing oil changes every 3,000 miles and use it on other things (I know oil and filters do not cost that much).
63GrandSport001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 04:14 PM   #154 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
jaywestfall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Drives: 1984 Pontiac Bonneville
Posts: 368
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

So with the FWD choice and hp numbers starting at around 300, are we looking at the return of torque steer with a few mods beyond stock?
__________________
Pontiac: Now I'm daily Driving Excitement with history!
Holden, please give us compelling product in NA again, soon
Member of The: I will never buy a Japanese car in my life Club
jaywestfall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 04:47 PM   #155 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
Butz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Old Miltia
Posts: 6,539
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

The interior is a little plain, other than that it looks very very nice, I like it.

I didn't know that HFV6 can do E85, can we get that engine in more cars?
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Down with the Anti-Smokers Nazis!
Government stay away from my high-fructose corn syrup!
Member of The:
  • I will never buy an imported car in my life Club.
  • I will never buy a locally built foreign car in my life Club.
  • I only buy American cars that are built in America Club.
Butz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 04:58 PM   #156 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
chevypowa670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chicagoland
Drives: 2008 impala SS 5.3 V8 2002 Suburban 5.3 Vortec
Posts: 226
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon says View Post
How is GM ahead of the curve with the SRX? Almost every manufacturer has a similar vehicle? If anyone has milked this segment is Lexus with the RX series, the were first,, they were fast and women all over the nation fell in love with it.
i was speaking in general with all their crossovers, before the world economy went down the drain CUV's were a very hot item. As much room as an SUV with better Fuel economy, people ate it up. The economy will come back some day and with it a pent-up demand for Automobiles, By that time GM it seems should have 3 very competitive offerings in the Equinox, SRX and the Terrain. That is how they are ahead of the curve.

Last edited by ChevyRules : 01-04-2009 at 10:21 PM.
chevypowa670 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 05:12 PM   #157 (permalink)
Banned
 
CmicasatheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,460
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butz View Post
The interior is a little plain, other than that it looks very very nice, I like it.

I didn't know that HFV6 can do E85, can we get that engine in more cars?
and where do U live... in Brazil??? Because in MD.. I think we have about 2 Public E85 Stations. My hope is that the Obama Admin. addresses this issue immediately.... They could replace the "MID-GRADE" pumps with Ethanol ones.. as I have not seen one person in this entire world use 89 Octane when they can use 87 and do it for less.
CmicasatheGreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 05:19 PM   #158 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 9,296
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by CmicasatheGreat View Post
and where do U live... in Brazil??? Because in MD.. I think we have about 2 Public E85 Stations. My hope is that the Obama Admin. addresses this issue immediately.... They could replace the "MID-GRADE" pumps with Ethanol ones.. as I have not seen one person in this entire world use 89 Octane when they can use 87 and do it for less.
Heh...I put 89 into the Envoy...she gets cranky running on 87.
__________________


Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM.
Current Cars:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4
2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6
1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6
Former Cars:
1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles)
1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles)
Future Car:
2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6
FenwickHockey65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 05:20 PM   #159 (permalink)
Banned
 
CmicasatheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,460
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by CmicasatheGreat View Post
It would be redundant... unless the NorthStar is finally DEAD... and CAdillac is offering a revised 3.6L with the $400 upgrade U can get from K&N that gets U an easy 330HP....

I have said it before... the 3.6L is only held back because the NorthStar exists... a 330HP 3.6L is completely doable... but it would be counter productive to do so as long as they can charge $10K more for the DOHC 32V 320HP V8.. even tho they don't see that they could charge $15K more a OHV 400 HP V8

Quote:
Originally Posted by CadiEldo67 View Post
Nissan get get 330 horsepower out of their 3.7 V6, so I agree that its a goal that can be met. But I don't think that the Northstar has to be killed to allow this to happen. Just don't upgrade the engine in the STS. The way I see it, the STS is dead and just put the upgraded 3.6 in the XLR, (the 4.6 makes 320 hp) and put the 7.0 LS7 in the XLR-V (the supercharged V makes 430hp, the LS7 makes 500) and there you have it.

If Nissan can get 330 horsepower out of their 3.7 V6, it can be done by General Motors.

The Northstar is not holding anything up. Continue the V8 in the STS/DTS and eliminate it in everything else.

CTS gets 3.0/3.6/6.2
SRX gets 3.0/2.8/3.6?
XLR gets 3.6/7.0

STS is dead after 2010 so don’t waste money on it. The XLR’s 4.6 V8 makes 320 hp, so use the upgraded 3.6 for 330 hp. Then use the LS7 for the V-Series, for a nice 50http://www.gminsidenews.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=16102540 hp. Only Cadillac gets 3.6 good for 330 hp. Lower ranking brands “suffer” with 300 or less.

Quick note.. the S/C Northstar makes 443HP in the XLR and 469HP in the STS-V...

I still maintain that the Northstar is the hold up on the 3.6L getting more power.. Check this out.. they have the 260HP 3.0LDi, but PLEASE tell me that the 3.6L is getting a boost to the 330HP range to compete better against the VQ 3.7L. I have seen the numbers from a better breathing 3.6L Di CTS... and it goes all the way to 350HP with minimal changes to the intake and exhaust.

After that.. GM needs that 3.0L Turbo we've been hearing about here... with 420HP as an alternative to not having a V8 in the car.

Here's a CHART from D3 showing the 3.6LDi with more power:

Check this one out... D3 Concepts took a CTS 3.6L Di (always remember that a average loss in HP is 15% from Flywheel to Rear Wheels... hence a 304HP engine divided by 1.15= 264HP)

Baseline run: vehicle produced 263.0 rwhp and 241.7 lbs/tq.
Adding the new Corsa Exhaust power jumped to 281.1 rwhp and 255.3 lbs/tq. for an increase of 18.1 rwhp and 13.6 lbs/tq



Added their intake system and power jumped to 294.2 rwhp and 261.3 lbs/tq for an increase of 13.1 rwhp and 6.0 lbs/tq. Total gain in power was 31.2 rwhp and 19.6 lbs/tq. from just an intake and exhaust.




MEANING: That they took a 304HP (at the Fly) 3.6LDi and boosted it to 340HP with the Exhaust and Intake MOD.....

using the same formula..

with JUST THE INTAKE and no exhaust mod.. the 304HP 3.6L would be boosted to 320HP (Northstar) anyone???
CmicasatheGreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 05:23 PM   #160 (permalink)
Banned
 
CmicasatheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,460
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Heh...I put 89 into the Envoy...she gets cranky running on 87.
Are U serious??? I would seriously just go the extra mile and get 93... Regular here in Baltimore is going for $1.41... MID is $1.59... Premium is $1.69
CmicasatheGreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 05:27 PM   #161 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Joep76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Drives: 2003 Saturn VUE AWD 2007 Saturn ION 3 Quad Coupe
Posts: 139
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Maybe its just me. But I think, The Equinox looks better. Equinox seems to pay more attention to little details. Interior looks more bold on the Equinox.
And from the pictures I have seen, looks like the Nox got chrome mirrors and the SRX has body color. Maybe thats an option for both.
And from some reason the SRX grille looks like it was flatted down too much.
Have to see it in person tho to get a real perspective on both.
__________________
Keep the American Revolution Rolling. That is what will save GM.
Joep76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 05:33 PM   #162 (permalink)
Banned
 
CmicasatheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,460
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joep76 View Post
Maybe its just me. But I think, The Equinox looks better. Equinox seems to pay more attention to little details. Interior looks more bold on the Equinox.
And from the pictures I have seen, looks like the Nox got chrome mirrors and the SRX has body color. Maybe thats an option for both.
And from some reason the SRX grille looks like it was flatted down too much.
Have to see it in person tho to get a real perspective on both.
Dude... it gotta be just U... I love the new Nox.. but this thing seriously has me thinking about downsizing from my Tahoe... and upgrading to a Cadillac CUV. (I Kid I kid... I think)
CmicasatheGreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 06:27 PM   #163 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
Premium Member
 
zete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 5,304
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
The attitude of the typical American...

Bob: Yeah, I just bought a brand new Corvette.
John: Wow, nice. Make sure you maintain it though.
Bob: Ah, whatever. As long as it looks good and feels good, it's good to me.

7 months later...

Bob: This Corvette's a piece of ****! ****ing thing broke down after only 45,000 miles! I'm never buying a GM ever again, their cars suck!
John: What? Lemme take a look..........dude, this oil is disgusting, when did you last get it changed??!
Bob: What? I have to get the oil changed?!
John: Duh! I do it every 3,000 miles or so.
Bob: That's ****ing bull****! I shouldn't have to change the oil, all I want is a good looking car! **** that ****!


And that MKX isn't going to look very good when the seats are covered in crap.
The sad part is that I know one person who fits this bill exactly. A very good friend of mine bought a Saturn Ion a few years ago. Last month they complained to me that it sounded funny, and ran like crap. I asked him to turn it on. It clanged and rattled so bad I asked: "When's the last time you checked the oil?" His answer: "It was filled when I bought, why would I have to check the oil? Japanese cars don't require you check the oil."

I looked at him like he was mental and checked the oil. He was down so low it didn't even register on the car. I told him to put some oil into it. The genius drove it to a quick lube place where they "emptied" the engine -- less than a litre of oil. They told him they were surprised the engine hadn't seized. He mentioned that Japanese cars would never have required an oil change. After the guys at the lube joint stopped laughing they asked when his last oil change was. They couldn't believe his answer but did inform him that if it was a Japanese car it, too, would require oil changes and that he was lucky the car's engine hadn't turned into a puddle of metal.

He is now rather quiet about complaining about his Saturn, instead he says he'll buy Japanese next time because GM won't be around next time he needs a car. I told him with the way he "pampers" that Saturn, he'll need a new car come April and GM will still be around come April .

People know so little about cars it's scary.
zete is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 06:30 PM   #164 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
red_rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Drives: 1997 Mazda B2300 5-spd.
Posts: 1,322
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Looks pretty good for a "cuv". Was hoping it would have a lower/sportier stance (like that last SRX) but I guess that's not what's in demand.
red_rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2009, 06:43 PM   #165 (permalink)
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
 
elderon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saginaw Michigan
Drives: 2004 Impala 2007 Silverado
Posts: 784
Re: NAIAS 09: 2010 Cadillac SRX

Wow this thing is gorgeous! I think its the best looking SUV I've ever seen.

Kudos to Cadillac!
__________________
2007 Chevy Silverado
2004 Chevy Impala
1999 Pontiac Trans Am Convertible - Gone but never forgotten.....
2010 Camaro V6 - near future.
elderon is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Autoshow Coverage



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.