Horrid styling aside, I don't see anything wrong with the concept.
Has it occurred to anyone here that the huge boom in fullsize truck sales over the past decade has simply been because they became fashionable to own? Nobody's doing any more towing today than they were 15-20 years ago. Half the fullsize truck owners I know traded in ordinary rides like Accords, Celicas and Grand Prix's for their trucks. Take a spin through the student parking lots on my campus. I have grave doubts that those F150s bought by Mommy & Daddy for college freshmen sons are towing bass boats to the spillway on the weekend. No, they're bought because trucks have a certain "cool" cachet to the American male. They're used NO differently than an ordinary car. So complaining about a Ridgeline or A-bat's inability to tow a horse float is pointless, because they're not designed to take on such tasks. I mean nobody needs an 8-litre V10 dually to haul around bedroom dressers and such.
The pickup truck has a certain appeal to the psyche of the American male. There's a "coolness" about them, and they strongly suggest masculinity, something that, in my opinion at least, has been systematically stripped from the American male over the past few decades (I'll spare y'all my misogynist ramblings...). I think what trucks like the Ridgeline were intended to do was to tap into this "I love trucks, but don't really NEED one" type of buyer. Granted, I'm sure this segment is possibly far outnumbered by truck buyers who need something beefier, but I gotta give Honda credit for at least tapping into a segment that no company had yet ventured. Of course I wish they'd done so with something not so friggin' ugly!
Nobody can say for sure that a crossover-based SUT would find a ready market. I've contended before that there's more of a market for them than the Ridgeline's sales suggest. Its horrid styling is enough to turn off many customers. That's why I'd suggest that GM, with its strong association with trucks, tap into that possibly lucrative segment with vehicles that would have more appeal to the traditional American pickup buyer. I'm wondering why they didn't redo the Avalanche on Lambda; it's raison d'etre suggests it was never intended to be a serious hauler like the Silverado, but rather more of a fullsize "lifestyle" type vehicle. I think GM and Honda were chasing the same customer, in theory at least.
So while I too almost skewered my own eyeballs to not have to look at the A-Bat, the concept behind the vehicle is sound. GM, bring us a Theta SUT and Lambda SUT (Switch anyone?) and show the Japanese how it's done!!!


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Bonnie



Van Gogh





