2009 Challenger R/T 25MPG

[Olds88]

I couldn't find this in the forums, so here goes. The 2009 Dodge Challenger will get 16/25 MPG ratings with either the 6sp manual or the 5sp slushbox. The automatic equipped R/T uses MDS (Chrysler's cylinder deactivation technology), whereas the manual does not. Both engines feature VVT and 372-375 hp.


The exact stats are available on Dodge's website(the link says 2008, but the 2009 model's numbers are listed right below it):
http://www.dodge.com/en/performance/...mpg_challenger

To me 25mpg really is impressive for a 4100lb car with 375hp and a 0-60 run in 5.5s.


Side Note: Also on Dodge's site if you look at dimensions it seems the Challenger will have 3" of legroom in the rear seat area over the Camaro (33 vs 30). The Dodge's rear seat may actually be usable. Who'd have thunk it?

[ksr]

I've been seeing quite a few Challengers at the local Dodge dealers. Are models available right now besides the high-end model they started with?

That is one great looking car.

[Olds88]

Originally Posted by ksr

I've been seeing quite a few Challengers at the local Dodge dealers. Are models available right now besides the high-end model they started with?

That is one great looking car.

There's three models of Challenger: SE (3.5L V6 and no manual ), R/T (5.7L V8 with optional 6sp manual ) and the SRT8 with the 6.1L V8 (manual introduced in 09). The 08 year is just automatic SRT8's, but 2009s should be heading out to dealers soon. The R/T and SE are much cheaper to own.

To me the real bargain is the R/T. It gives you plenty of power, a 6-speed manual, and 16/25 EPA for fuel economy. I will be buying myself one within the next year or so. As much as I'd love a new Camaro, the classic muscle car look beats the pony car look 7 days a week for me. Plus the R/T suspension will be far more compliant and produce a much smoother ride.

[tgferg67]

Just wanted to note the recommeded fuel is 89 octane, probably making the fuel economy numbers look a little better than they would on 87.

[newdude]

Not sure if anyone read the SRT-8 write up on allpar.com but they got a max of 26mpg (not average) with the 6-spd.

http://www.allpar.com/reviews/2009/challenger.html

[big swede]

Originally Posted by Olds88

I couldn't find this in the forums, so here goes. The 2009 Dodge Challenger will get 16/25 MPG ratings with either the 6sp manual or the 5sp slushbox. The automatic equipped R/T uses MDS (Chrysler's cylinder deactivation technology), whereas the manual does not. Both engines feature VVT and 372-375 hp.


The exact stats are available on Dodge's website(the link says 2008, but the 2009 model's numbers are listed right below it):
http://www.dodge.com/en/performance/...mpg_challenger

To me 25mpg really is impressive for a 4100lb car with 375hp and a 0-60 run in 5.5s.


Side Note: Also on Dodge's site if you look at dimensions it seems the Challenger will have 3" of legroom in the rear seat area over the Camaro (33 vs 30). The Dodge's rear seat may actually be usable. Who'd have thunk it?

Not sure why you would be suprised about the back seat. The Challenger is the only 5 seat coupe I can even think of. I love the Challenger also but why the back seat difference of 3 inches would make much of a difference for purchasing one of these muscle cars really boggles the mind.

Originally Posted by newdude

Not sure if anyone read the SRT-8 write up on allpar.com but they got a max of 26mpg (not average) with the 6-spd.

http://www.allpar.com/reviews/2009/challenger.html

The SRT-8 has a different more powerful engine than the RT that the original poster is talking about.

[GMusa]

25mpg pretty good.. The Camaro with the V8 and auto with 400 hp (compared to the RT's 375hp) will get 23 mpg according to Chevy. And considering that the V8 Camaro and RT will be priced pretty close together, I would take the extra hp in the Camaro over 2mpg.

[E. Haskell]

Originally Posted by GMusa

25mpg pretty good.. The Camaro with the V8 and auto with 400 hp (compared to the RT's 375hp) will get 23 mpg according to Chevy. And considering that the V8 Camaro and RT will be priced pretty close together, I would take the extra hp in the Camaro over 2mpg.

If GM's performance estimates are correct, the SS should be as quick as the SRT8 (0-60 under 5 seconds). For those wanting better gas mileage, the RS has plenty of power and gets 26 mpg on regular fuel.

[GMusa]

Originally Posted by E. Haskell

If GM's performance estimates are correct, the SS should be as quick as the SRT8 (0-60 under 5 seconds). For those wanting better gas mileage, the RS has plenty of power and gets 26 mpg on regular fuel.

So the SS will have equal or better performance then the SRT8 while getting better gas mileage and being priced around the RT. Sounds good to me.

[Ambalanche]

Originally Posted by GMusa

25mpg pretty good.. The Camaro with the V8 and auto with 400 hp (compared to the RT's 375hp) will get 23 mpg according to Chevy. And considering that the V8 Camaro and RT will be priced pretty close together, I would take the extra hp in the Camaro over 2mpg.

I also think the Challenger looks better in person than in pics. One question, Does the Camaro SS use regular or Premium? My LS2 requires premium.

[GMusa]

Originally Posted by Ambalanche

I also think the Challenger looks better in person than in pics. One question, Does the Camaro SS use regular or Premium? My LS2 requires premium.

Not sure.. i dont think GM has said actually.

[BigAls87Z28]

Its an LS3, and premium is recommened but no required. You will lose some power.
Official EPA ratings have yet to show up. 422hp and 6spd manual should be good for 25mpg or better.

[wescoent]

Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28

Its an LS3, and premium is recommened but no required. You will lose some power.
Official EPA ratings have yet to show up. 422hp and 6spd manual should be good for 25mpg or better.

Camaro isn't exactly aerodynamic either... not to imply the Challenger or Mustang are.

Does the Camaro get DoD?

[big swede]

Originally Posted by GMusa

So the SS will have equal or better performance then the SRT8 while getting better gas mileage and being priced around the RT. Sounds good to me.

I thought the SS was rated lower than the 25mpg of the RT.

Should probably read: The SS will get better mileage and have equal or better performance than the SRT8 while being priced around the RT (let's hope).

Originally Posted by wescoent;1522146[/img

Camaro isn't exactly aerodynamic either... not to imply the Challenger or Mustang are.

Does the Camaro get DoD?

The automatic SS does.

[E. Haskell]

Originally Posted by big swede

I thought the SS was rated lower than the 25mpg of the RT.

Should probably read: The SS will get better mileage and have equal or better performance than the SRT8 while being priced around the RT (let's hope).

I think both of you are saying the same thing.