![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: May 2003
Drives: 1991 LX 5.0L, 2006 Fusion SEL Steeda, 2007 Five Hu
Posts: 631
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
I don't think the 6.2L will be Flex fuel. The reason is that it isn't meant to be used in F-150's. The reason the 5.4L (and 5.3L, and most others) is flex fuel is due to CAFE. The Flex fuel gives the engine a much better rating on Corporate Average Fuel Economy.
The 6.2L is going to be the engine for the 2011 Super Duty and will be common in that application. Over 8500# GVWR vehicles are considered commercial and therefore don't need the E-85 loophole to avoid CAFE fines. Thats why the 5.4L currently in the Super Duty isn't flex fuel while the F-150 is. The F-150 will be rarely seen in with a 6.2L so I don't see a need to make this distinction for that market. How many 6.2L Chevy trucks have you seen? I've never found one on a lot at any of the nearby dealerships. I expect the 6.2L Ford to be simmilar, found in special editions (Raptor/Harley?) but rarely seen in normal trucks. I'm also waiting to see the power curves, or at least the RPM the peak numbers are at. I have a hunch they're going to be at high RPM's like the Hemi and the 6.2L GM engine. Otherwise why would Ford continue to offer the V10 on the heavier DRW trucks? I think the 6.2L will work well for most SRW truck buyer, but won't be as good as the V10 at pulling, but will best all the competitors gas engines so I guess thats what counts. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Chevrolet VOLT
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,939
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
SO. This is just going in the Raptor and the Super Duties? That's what I've been able to glean from the press releases.
The F150 still won't have a motor to go against either the widely available 390hp/410lb-ft 5.7L Hemi in the Ram or the very limited availability 403hp/417lb-ft 6.2L Vortec V8 in the Silverado (2wd LTZ Crew Cabs only (like, why even offer it if it's that restricted?). Even the 367hp/375lb-ft 6.0L Vortec outguns the best F-150 mill. Oh well, the lack of a decent motor hasn't really hurt sales. I suppose Ford buyers just don't care. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,866
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
Quote:
I bet Ford unveils the next E-Series with full length side curtain airbags two days after we buy another minivan. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,462
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
Quote:
3.7L V6: 270-315hp (unknown at this point how it'll be tuned) 5.0L V8: 360hp 3.5L V6TT: 425hp Any questions?
__________________
"It's only when the tide goes out that you learn who's been swimming naked." -Warren Buffet(t)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OC, CA
Drives: '07 Colorado 2wd
Posts: 2,278
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
I don't know about LTZ numbers, but 2wd Crew Cabs have got to be the #1 selling cab/drivetrain combination. Still, I wish its availability weren't an issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 190
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
That is a good question. The only engine that I am concerned about is the 3.7. The V8 torque should be fine and the 3.5TT will be ecoboost so no issues with torque there.
The F-series will be class leading/competitive in HP from top to bottom. |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: May 2003
Drives: 1991 LX 5.0L, 2006 Fusion SEL Steeda, 2007 Five Hu
Posts: 631
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
Quote:
If buyers really were as stuck on Horsepower as many on this site belive, Dodge sales would be through the roof because they are the only large 1/2 ton truck manufacturer with big horsepower engines in the majority of their trucks. Honestly we've started seeing a increase in 4.6L 3V sales now that the fuel economy has improved on it. With a 4x4 getting 2 mpg better than the 5.4L, its still got more power than the 2V 5.4L had and most people are plenty happy after a test drive. Heck the local Sheriff's department got a new F-150 this spring and even went with the 4.6L 3V. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 4,461
|
Re: Ford 6.2L Official numbers are out
Quote:
I thought that might have been a little optimistic when Ford's "only" getting 411hp out of the 6.2L
__________________
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|