GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > The Tech Forum
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-25-2007, 11:14 PM   #16 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
tamatt27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 1,030
Re: What GM says about e85 conversions

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1999 White C5 Coupe View Post
E85 fuel contains about two-thirds the energy of non-ethanol unleaded gasoline (gallon for gallon).

What is rarely discussed is that vehicles designed to run on E85 fuel get significantly less mileage using E85 fuel compared to using non-ethanol unleaded fuel (or fuel that has 10% or less ethanol).

Why would anyone want to convert a vehicle to run on E85 fuel and reduce their fuel mileage significantly?

GM is touting the number of new vehicles designed to run on E85 fuel, but the company does not talk about the reduced mileage.
Well I can see your stance may hold some truth to people that only use the cheapest gas (regular unleaded). Those of us who have to use Supreme, E85 is much more beneficial, cost-wise. Supreme is $3.25 here in vs E85 $2.69.
__________________
GM: 'Meet the new boss....same as the old boss!'
tamatt27 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-26-2007, 01:01 AM   #17 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
chakis24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Drives: 2005 chevy silverado 1500 5.3 EC LB Z-71
Posts: 4,135
Re: What GM says about e85 conversions

sp wait, how do i know if my truck is e-85 capable? id imagine since the z71 badging was stripped when i bought it the flex fuel badge might be as well. is it in the VIN? isnt my gas cap supposed to be yellow or something? that would be really cool if it turns out my truck is e85 capable (even if no pumps are in the surrounding area). and i have the build sheet for it, would it be in there?

if it isnt though, does gm do a retrofit? is there a way for gm to make my truck e85 capable? i would be all for it if that were the case.

EDIT: i found this in the build sheet:

PDU - LIGHT DUTY POWER PACKAGE: * VORTEC 5300 V8 SFI GAS ENGINE * HD TRAILERING EQUIPMENT
LM7 - VORTEC 5.3L 295HP IRON BLK V8

and theres no Z in my VIN
__________________
My Ride: 2005 Chevy Silverado Z71
3" PA Body lift 34" Nitto Terra Grapplers 17x9Pro Comp Wheels Halo HID Projector headlights w LED halo projector fog lights Pace Edward toneau cover Fire&Ice LED bar Patriot window decal black LED bumper lights black&red grille emblem iPOD jack
My Toy: 2009 Arctic Cat 700 Mud Pro
Snorkel 28" Outlaw MSTs 14" ground clearance 10" travel locked rear selectable 4x4 & front locker winch hitch IFS/IRS

Last edited by chakis24 : 11-26-2007 at 01:06 AM.
chakis24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2007, 09:59 AM   #18 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
solman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Drives: 06 Daytona Blue HHR 5-speed
Posts: 1,220
Re: What GM says about e85 conversions

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamatt27 View Post
(Positive) facts about E85:
1. It is not corrosive to the fuel system or the engine. This is a myth and ethanol is often confused with methanol, which actually have corrosive properties. I´ve run my car for well over two years on E85 without a problem. Some models before 1988 on the other hand may have some parts that is not ethanol resistant. If we are talking Volvo´s, then this mainly applies to the non-electronically injection systems such as K-jet etc. Most cars with electronical fuel injection (EFI) should be resistant to ethanol. Some people say it would kill your engine right away and that you should buy there racefuel instead (of course they say )

2. It is not as harmful to the nature/environment as gasoline or any other petroleum products for that matter. Ethanol is made out of renewable energy resources such as crops and trees to name a few things. The carbon dioxide that an ethanol powered car emits is not contributing to the greenhouse effect, but is taken up by the plants and is being "re-used". The carbon dioxide then goes around in a closed loop. Gasoline on the other hand is made from oil that comes from old dinosaurs , plants and other stuff 100 000 of years ago, and it doesn´t take part in the closed loop but only adds to the amount of greenhouse gasses. Ethanol is also easily bio-degradeable if it should leak into our environment.

3. E85 is 104-105 octane and therefore it´s more knock-resistent and can tolerate more boost or a higher CR.

4. E85 cools the intake charge more and therefore it´s more knock-resistent and can tolerate more boost or a higher CR. And it also makes the engine run cooler and to some degree, even safer.

5. E85 is in most cases at least 5% more effícient than gasoline at the same lambda value (up to 25% more efficient on some cars optimized soley for E85). Mill your heads

6. Since E85 has very good cleaning properties as well as leaving behind a rest-product of water, it is cleaning the fuel system and it will keep the injectors nice and clean. The combustion chambers, valves, ports and the exhaust will also be clean(er), almost like the car had water injection.

7. In most cases it will cost less $/mile to run on E85.


(Negative) facts about E85:
1. Cars running on E85 have some trouble starting when the engine temperature drops below +5*C. Cars running E100 (not very common) have some trouble starting when the intake (the air) temperature is below +15*C. This is easily solved by using an engine heater in the winter, electrical or fuel-heated (this is recommended on all cars regardless of fuel to get better mileage, less wear on the engine and less impact on the environment etc., but that is another matter to discuss and will not be brought up here...). Some people also adds a little extra gasoline to the tank of E85 to help with cold-starts.

2. Since cars running E85 requires roughly 30% more fuel, a tank of E85 will not get you as far as a tank of gasoline and you will have to refuel more often. This is often disregarded by E85 users who learn to live with it because of the economical gains.

How much will my miles per gallon of fuel drop with E85?
The only negative to E85 is that it gives a lower fuel milage on a gallon for gallon basis to gasoline. The actual difference in energy content between straight gasoline and E85 is about 27%.
The drop in milage is not as significant as you would think based on that difference due to the higher effeciency of the ethanol as a high performance fuel.
The lower milage is not really a big deal, ethanol has lower energy per gallon but your reduction in milage is not nearly as large as that difference would imply. Due to the higher torque,you use slightly smaller throttle openings to get the same level of preformance, and due to the greater quantity of combustion products (more moles of gas) per lb of fuel the engine effeciency actually goes up slightly.

***Thanks fo RUNN at LS1tech.com for the info!***
Can anyone else verify this?
__________________

18" Polished Cobalt SS/SC wheels, LED tails, Recon 48 LED running board lights/signals
solman98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2007, 02:43 PM   #19 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
goochman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,414
Re: What GM says about e85 conversions

I revently got an Enclave and was checking to see if the 3.6 VVT DOHC engine was E85 - I was surprised to see it wasnt certified for this. Kinda thought GM was doing this for most of its mainstream motors and figured one of their newer designs would have this. No biggie since there is only 1 Ethanol station within 200 miles of me and is run by the County Govt, but one of these days I was hoping to put some corn in the tank
__________________
------------
Goochman

2002 Pontiac Bonneville
2008 Buick Enclave CXL
2009 Jeep Wrangler Sahara Unlimited
goochman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2009, 02:38 AM   #20 (permalink)
2.5L Iron Duke
 
Ixion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Connecticut
Drives: 1994 Chevy Beretta Z26 w/ '01 3400SFI, 4T60-E
Posts: 17
Re: What GM says about e85 conversions

Quote:
Originally Posted by likearock00 View Post
E-85 is no better of a deal than regular unleaded. Why go through the trouble of rigging your vehicle and voiding your warranty just to use it? I am sure there are some stupid people out there who will try, and I will laugh when I read the stories on here.
Will you still laugh when it gets done to a 15-year-old car that's long outside its warranty, and used to benefit on forced induction? I wouldn't retrofit just to use E85, though, when I can easily and cost-effectively fill up with regular 87. In fact, even E10 has a noticeable decrease in fuel efficiency on a full tank compared to filling up with straight gasoline (which is getting harder and harder to find now). 310 miles per tank vs 280!
Ixion is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > The Tech Forum



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.