![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The largest small town in Texas
Drives: 06 Saturn Vue; 86 Buick LeSabre
Posts: 812
|
Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
My family and I had the pleasure and time to take a ski trip to Sipapu, a ski area in central New Mexico. Fortunately I convinced my dad to rent a minivan and we were blessed, sort of, by getting a Pontiac Montana SV6. Our example provided many unexpected surprises as well as many disappointments. Fortunately the owners manual and sticker were hidden in the back so I could explore the many features of our rental minivan. Ours came with the Convenience and Preferred Package as well as the sport suspension and StabiliTrak. First the interior, I found unexpectedly sporty for a minivan. There were aluminum accents tastefully placed over the dash and the textures were upscale although the material was hard it felt substantial. All the controls felt upscale as well with well defined notches for the vent and radio controls. The armrest on the door was covered in a soft material that added to the upscale feel of the interior. The seats I found to be supportive and comfortable but lacking severely in lateral support. Especially in the middle seats where in the mountains it felt like my sister and I were playing a game of pancake while trying to watch a movie on the standard rear seat entertainment center. Speaking of the entertainment center both my sister and I found it very intuitive and within minutes of leaving the rental lot we had figured out how to operate everything associated with it. The rear cargo area, although gimmicky I found useful and excellent at giving the appearance that the rear seats fold flat, although they don’t, and we all know it GM. Most of the gauges and displays, even the DVD controls lit up red to continue the Pontiac’s sporty image. All the controls were clearly labeled and intuitive to use which I found helpful with a techno-phobic mother riding shotgun, keeping me from having to explain how everything works. ![]() I find the exterior of the Pontiac to be my favorite of the 4 GM minivans. Everything comes together well to give it a sporty look, even for a minivan. The 17 inch aluminum wheels prominently display the four wheel discs. Panel gaps were tight which I found impressive. There are some people that will fall for the SUV look of this van like my sister did. The aluminum looking rails on the roof rack and the plastic clad ground effects also help to ensure that it looks more SUV (excuse me CSV) than minivan. Pictures do not do the Montana justice, in person it is clear that GM tried hard to make it more SUV like and in most ways it succeeds. Onto the drive. The ride was pleasantly smooth and any bumps that were encountered were absorbed quickly and effortlessly not disrupting the movie my sister and I were currently watching. Even in the mountains I noticed relatively little body roll for a minivan, mind you it had the sport suspension. I wish I could say such positive things about the engine and transmission. Maybe the 3.9 and/or the 6 speed automatic would have helped, never the less the 3.5 and 4 speed left much to be desired, much, much to be desired. On the highway at 80 mph it was sluggish at worst, but in the mountains it was anemic at best. The engine seemed to groan at every hill we encountered and the 4 speed could not keep it in its optimal power band leaving it to shift repeatedly. At one point the engine and transmission noise was so intrusive into the passenger compartment that I could clearly hear them through my in-ear headphones. On a final note my whole family agreed that it was clearly missing some key features to even make it remotely competitive in the market. Although it contained a standard DVD player at a sticker price of almost $30,000 I expected auto climate control, CD changer and dual power doors and power lift gate. Also, the engine and transmission as well as the lack of decent seats keep it from becoming the minivan I know GM is capable of building. Thank you NASP for helping me host these images and... I hope all of you have a Happy New Year.
__________________
Current Family Rides: Mine: 2006 Saturn Vue Sisters: 1986 Buick LeSabre Moms: 1994 Chevrolet Suburban Dads: 2002 Chevrolet Avalanche 1984 Chevrolet Blazer Last edited by cemaxc : 01-01-2006 at 02:45 AM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Old Miltia
Posts: 6,539
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
Quote:
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) (")_(") Down with the Anti-Smokers Nazis! Government stay away from my high-fructose corn syrup! ![]() Member of The:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS3 V8
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX (Katy Area)
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GT
Posts: 3,957
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
At least you weren't stranded on the highway...
__________________
2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GT - 112,000 mi. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,056
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
I like the Montana SV6 alot. I haven't really sat in one, but I sat in the Relay and quite liked it a lot. The 3.5L V6 has about the same performance (at least in 0-60 times) as our Vue and it won't be a thrill ride. If you get the RWB it's probably a lot better considering it's got less mass. I was looking at fuel mileage ratings for the 3.5L V6 and the 3.9L V6 and I think GM would be smarter to use the 3900 V6 considering it gets essentially the same gas mileage as the 3.5L and offers that extra needed power in either RWB or EWB. I think the 3500 V6 is fine in the RWB and offering the 3.9L V6 as an option wouldn't hurt. However the EWB needs the 3.9L V6 standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,463
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
Great Review but the CSVs are defiantly not competitive with others in its class.
__________________
"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress."- John Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The largest small town in Texas
Drives: 06 Saturn Vue; 86 Buick LeSabre
Posts: 812
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
Quote:
__________________
Current Family Rides: Mine: 2006 Saturn Vue Sisters: 1986 Buick LeSabre Moms: 1994 Chevrolet Suburban Dads: 2002 Chevrolet Avalanche 1984 Chevrolet Blazer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Montana
Posts: 861
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
The only thing I think I like about the Montana and the others is that you can see the hood. I hate how you can't see the hood on minivans. While it looks like hell on the outside, I like to see my hood!
I know others like the red gauge lighting, but I've never been a fan of it. I'm more of a blue and white gauge person. I'll take that ugly green lighting scheme like in my Camry and Lincoln over the red. I suppose it's just too hard on my eyes. This isn't nearly competitive on the market today. Back to the drawing board guys.
__________________
Garage Lineup 73 Lincoln Continental Mark IV 80,000 miles 96 Lincoln Mark VIII 150,000 miles 93 Toyota Camry 218,000 miles Leavin Soon............. Coming Soon Mark VIII................. 03 Town Car Cartier L Camry..................... 07 Avalon Limited
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 1,516
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
Very nice review, as well as great pics. I'm a little puzzled at Pontiac's decision to keep the tach and speedo display with white numerals at night while the other gauges go red.
As for the engine, well, I haven't driven these new vans yet, however, my 3400 RWB Venture doesn't seem to have much trouble keeping up with traffic, so I would imagine that the newer 3500 would probably be just adequate in the new RWB vans and slightly taxed in EWB models, just like you pointed out. Trouble with the 3900 is fuel mileage... The interior is definitely an improvement over the previous vans. I've sat in them at the dealer and was quite impressed. Wayyyy better that my Venture. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fox Valley Wisconsin
Drives: 2008 Impala,1981 Bonneville, 1985 Caprice
Posts: 955
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
I am another that doesnt like red dash lighting that Pontiac uses. For that reason alone I would get the Chevrolet version.
__________________
2008 Chevrolet Impala LS. 1981 Pontiac Bonneville. "The last full sized RWD Bonneville". 1985 Chevrolet Caprice. 2007 Sears Craftsman Lawn Tractor. 1986 John Deere Lawn Tractor. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Drives: 2007 Silverado 4x4
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
I think GM should drop these. I think every competitor is better.
Those who do buy them (at least the few that I know who bought Relays) will never go back to GM with all the problems they have. These things are hurting GM much more than helping.
__________________
Get your geek on in 2012! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,334
|
Re: Pontiac Montana SV6 review by cemaxc
Quote:
__________________
How much Koolaid have you drunk today? IS it enough for the win? Or should we wait till next year? |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|