GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Reader Car Reviews
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2007, 10:44 AM   #1 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
King Riffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fond Du Lac, WI
Drives: 2004 Ford Taurus SES sedan.
Posts: 3,080
King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

So yesterday I decided to take a look at a Five Hundred sitting on a dealership's lot. It was a loaded Five Hundred SEL. My notes:

-The trunk is huge. Like, Canada huge.

-The interior materials were not as good as they could be. The door panels especially felt rather cheap. Everything looks good though, I did not notice any large or uneven gaps in the material.

-The interior is also huge. You feel somewhat insignificant compared to the car while sitting in it.

-The drivers seat was quite comfortable, and you sit in it as you would sit on a kitchen chair. The seat is quite high and can go higher than I had it.

-I'm convinced that the wing mirrors were a joke. They're, like many other parts of this car, huge. A little taller than the mirrors on Astro vans but not quite as wide.

-The guages are a bit small, which is odd considering the size of everything else in this car.

-The car feels underpowered. It also seemed to rev somewhat high to get what power it does have. I don't think that the car is as underpowered as it feels though, it got up to speed on the onramp pretty quickly.

-I hate automatic climate controls. I don't know what temperature I want the car. I just want it cold. Make it cold in here, you worthless #%#@)( of a machine.

I'll take knobs or sliders any day.

-No windnoise, rattles or squeaks. I didn't notice much roadnoise at all, the Five Hundred was pretty quiet on the freeway.

-The stereo didn't sound very good, but I didn't adjust it any on this short drive.

-Back seat legroom is plentiful. These seats are also quite high off of the floor. Spending a day back here would be no problem.


I thought it was a pretty nice car. The new engine and transmission in the Taurus will help tremendously. I would consider one to replace the Taurus if the price is right.

I would also Recommend it to anyone looking for a large car.
__________________
King Riffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-23-2007, 11:04 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Cabana Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,356
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

A tad late with your 500 review, as they are currently making the new Taurus that also fixes most of your complaints.

Oh, and autoclimate controls ROCK. You set the temp to 70 and let it do all the work. What's that you say? Your significant other is a tad colder? Then just set their dual climate zone temp to 75, or whatever stops them from complaining. try that with sliders
Cabana Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 11:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
King Riffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fond Du Lac, WI
Drives: 2004 Ford Taurus SES sedan.
Posts: 3,080
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

Yeah, a bit late I know. I don't think the Taurus is going to be that much different though.

If the passenger is too cold they should've worn a sweater.
__________________
King Riffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 11:49 AM   #4 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Buick61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC Metro Area
Drives: 58 Belvedere; 61 LeSabre; 96 Fleetwood; 07 SRX
Posts: 8,317
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

What's a Ford Five-Hundred? I can't remember ever seeing one on the road...
__________________
Used to own:

1959 Cadillac Series 62, 1960 AMC Rambler Six,
1998 Chevrolet Malibu, 2000 Saturn LS2,
2005 Chrysler 300C, 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP
Buick61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 11:50 AM   #5 (permalink)
Ach
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Ach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Drives: Ford SVT Contour BMW 635CSi
Posts: 1,298
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

I too hate auto climate controls. I just treat it like manual anyway-60 when hot, 80 when cold, and adjust the fan as I see fit. What were your impressions, if any, of the steering and ride/handling?
__________________
The Fleet:
2007 Lincoln MKZ
2000 Ford SVT Contour
1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1985 BMW 635CSi

The Past:
1997 Lincoln Mark VIII LSC
1995 BMW 530i
1998 Olds Aurora
1994 Infiniti Q45t
1988 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1989 Acura Legend Coupe L
1989 Olds Eighty Eight Royale
Ach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 12:12 PM   #6 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
King Riffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fond Du Lac, WI
Drives: 2004 Ford Taurus SES sedan.
Posts: 3,080
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

The ride was much firmer than I expected. Not bone-jarring or anything though.

I can't really comment on the handling. I just took it through town a bit and then for a short drive on the freeway. So only a few corners at lower speeds. I expect with the firm ride it handles okay for a larger vehicle.
__________________
King Riffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 12:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
likearock00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NC
Drives: 2006 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab Z-71
Posts: 7,624
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

Ford is so stupid. The 500 should've been the new Crown Vic, and the Fusion should've been the Taurus. The could have asked a bit more for the 500 and done very well. Just stupid.

My parents drive a Taurus now, and they want to replace it with a 500. I just don't understand why they would need that much space. I bet if they changed the name of the Fusion to Taurus, they'd want it!
__________________
"You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." -George W. Bush
likearock00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 01:02 PM   #8 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
King Riffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fond Du Lac, WI
Drives: 2004 Ford Taurus SES sedan.
Posts: 3,080
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

Quote:
Originally Posted by likearock00
Ford is so stupid. The 500 should've been the new Crown Vic, and the Fusion should've been the Taurus. The could have asked a bit more for the 500 and done very well. Just stupid.

My parents drive a Taurus now, and they want to replace it with a 500. I just don't understand why they would need that much space. I bet if they changed the name of the Fusion to Taurus, they'd want it!
The Fusion is selling quite well though, to change it's name right now would be very risky. Plus I don't think the Taurus name would work as well since it's aimed at younger people.

The Five Hundred, on the other hand, is meant as Ford's family car. The Taurus name fits perfectly.
__________________

Last edited by King Riffle : 05-23-2007 at 01:06 PM.
King Riffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 05:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 246
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

The Fusion should keep it's name, it's a neat name.

The Crown Vic name will likely not resurface after the current model dies, unless it represents a new fleet-only model. There is almost zero demand for retail Vics, and the name doesn't have much equity in the retail marketplace anymore. It'd be more of a liability than an asset.
HashiriyaS14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2007, 06:51 PM   #10 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
likearock00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NC
Drives: 2006 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab Z-71
Posts: 7,624
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

It needs to keep it's name now....I agree. I'm saying Ford should've named these cars right from the get-go.
__________________
"You can fool some of the people all the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on." -George W. Bush
likearock00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2007, 04:12 AM   #11 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Old Dood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lansing
Drives: 2000 Park Avenue 2007 Camry XLE
Posts: 7,463
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

I liked the name 500 or is it FiveHundred? It reminded me of the Galaxy 500 which became the LTD.

My Brother in Law (sister's husband) owns a 2006 loaded 500 and it is not a bad car. It is a bit under powered but it does ride pretty nice. The NAV isn't bad except that will tell you to make a Legal U-turn. What is that? There is such an animal as a LEGAL U-turn?

I too enjoy having dual climate controls. It keeps Mrs Dood happy EXCEPT she will complain that the fan is too loud because I have mine set lower so I end up raising my temps to quiet the fan to shut...err...quiet her up....*sigh* Wives...
__________________
2000 Park Avenue
2007 Camry XLE
"We must be free not because we claim freedom, but because we practice it." ~William Faulkner
http://www.afterlife101.com/research2.html
By the Way: There IS a Cabal
Old Dood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 01:52 AM   #12 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
King Riffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fond Du Lac, WI
Drives: 2004 Ford Taurus SES sedan.
Posts: 3,080
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Dood
I liked the name 500 or is it FiveHundred? It reminded me of the Galaxy 500 which became the LTD.
It is technically the "Ford Five Hundred". It had to start with the letter "F" remember. Few people actually type that out though.
__________________
King Riffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2007, 02:23 AM   #13 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
CRBoyd91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX (Katy Area)
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GT
Posts: 3,941
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Riffle
It is technically the "Ford Five Hundred". It had to start with the letter "F" remember. Few people actually type that out though.
Exactly.

Pretty much on par with what I've read in most other reviews of it. An impressive vehicle indeed.
__________________
Family Vehicles:
Mom: 2003 Chevrolet Suburban LS - 78,000 mi.
Dad: 1996 Ford Ranger XLT - 230,000 mi.
Sister: 2001 Saturn SC2 - 50,000 mi.
Me: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GT - 88,000 mi.
CRBoyd91 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2007, 10:19 AM   #14 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
mikmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pacific Paradise, Australia
Drives: VZ Wagon and JSII sedan
Posts: 7,459
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred



+ how do you rate it vs. Impala for price/size?
__________________


You start a conversation you cant even finish it. You're talkin a lot, but you're not sayin anything.
When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed. Say something once, why say it again?
mikmak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2007, 12:30 AM   #15 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
King Riffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fond Du Lac, WI
Drives: 2004 Ford Taurus SES sedan.
Posts: 3,080
Re: King Riffle drives the 2006 Ford Five Hundred

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikmak


+ how do you rate it vs. Impala for price/size?
I'm sorry I didn't see your response sooner.

I haven't driven a current Impala so I'm not going to compare the two on road manners. From what I've read though I gather that the Impala has a softer ride.

I have sat in a new Impala though. The Five Hundred is much bigger and much more spacious than the Impala. You also have a much higher seating position in the Five Hundred.

I'd rate the Five Hundred's interior slightly above the Impala's. Other than the truck interiors (and a few other rare exceptions) GM interiors haven't impressed me since the very early 1990's.

Edit: I don't have any pictures of the one I drove. Here are some pictures from www.motorpoint.com.au to give you an idea of what I'm talking about. Mine was a dark red.



__________________

Last edited by King Riffle : 09-18-2007 at 12:39 AM.
King Riffle is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Reader Car Reviews



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.