GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Reader Car Reviews
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2009, 02:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
genjy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,847
2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

My brother-in-law (23) was considering a new turbo compact car.

He can't drive manual (yet), so he took me to test drive the cars for him.

We... or I... test drove:

2009 VW GTI (~200HP)
2009 Mazdaspeed3 (~265HP)
2009 Subaru WRX (~265HP)


I have actually driven the GTI and the Speed3 a long while back, and I've driven my cousin's SAABaru Aero many times... so nothing was super-new to me. This short review is based my back-to-back-to-back test drive experience (with a bit of Volvo C30 thrown in)

The GTI feels a lot like my Volvo C30 in terms of... everything. But its interior doesn't feel as quite well-built, and the engine feels less powerful. The 2.0T feels more refined and less raw than the Volvo T5, and it feels much much less sporty than the Speed3's and WRX's. The handling feels very nimble, but the handling alone doesn't quite compensate for the relatively lack-luster acceleration. It seems to be the most civilized car of the three.

The Speed3's interior is comparable to my Mazda5's: hard, cheap, with passable fit and finish. The Speed3's acceleration feels very sporty and well-tuned... linear, predictable, and well-behaved, unlike the WRX's acceleration. The engine and exhaust sound awesome with a sporty resonance that's not too tiring.

I actually like the WRX the best. The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th gear acceleration is beastly. Step on the gas and it's warp speed. Even though the Speed3 and WRX have similar power ratings, the WRX feels significantly faster. Its acceleration is very raw and very addictive. The interior isn't half-bad at all, despite its quirky design. I think it feels more durable than both the GTI's and Speed3's interiors.

Exterior design wise, I think they are all handsome for their class... with the GTI being more a bit more sedated and sophisticated looking.

Of course, me being the one not actually buying the car, I didn't focus at all on the price. That was my brother-in-law's job.

My brother-in-law has decided to get a VW GTI based on ride-comfort and interior quality. I think he likes the GTI's overall value, as well.

We are going to pick it up this weekend, I think.
__________________

2008 5-cylinder turbo hatchback w/ 6sp manual
2006 4-cylinder minivan w/ 5sp manual

Last edited by genjy : 01-13-2009 at 12:18 PM.
genjy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-12-2009, 02:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS3 V8
 
MCGARRETT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,585
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

What no Cobalt SS?
MCGARRETT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 02:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
big swede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 5,028
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Quote:
Originally Posted by MCGARRETT View Post
What no Cobalt SS?
I would presume he wanted a hatch. I would have thought the VW had the best interior but the performance of the other two would be tough to pass up. The upcoming GTI-R would have taken care of the performance. The upcoming Focus st should be interesting also.

Last edited by big swede : 01-17-2009 at 05:37 PM.
big swede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 02:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
genjy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,847
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

He was aware of the Mini Cooper S and Cobalt SS... but he didn't mention he wanted to see them.

I would have loved a turbo Cobalt test drive, but I think it would have been sort of pointless for him since he did eventually picked the GTI for its non-sporty qualities.
__________________

2008 5-cylinder turbo hatchback w/ 6sp manual
2006 4-cylinder minivan w/ 5sp manual

Last edited by genjy : 01-12-2009 at 02:42 PM.
genjy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 03:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Of The North
Drives: '08 GMC Canyon
Posts: 1,596
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Tell bro in law to have plenty of $$$ for insurance and a good lawyer.

He'll need both.
MrCritical is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 05:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
F14CRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 6,180
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Quote:
Originally Posted by big swede View Post
I would presume he wanted a hatch. I would have thought the VW had the best interior but the performance of the other two would be tough to pass up. The upcoming GTr would have taken care of the performance. The upcoming Focus st should be interesting also.
HHR SS?

eh I'd take the WRX myself
__________________
Owner of vehicles powered by a Buick even-fire V6, Chevy 60 degree OHV V6, a big block Buick V8, and a quadrozontal

Triple-X08:take your hybrids and shove em up yer ass, i'll take my fuel injection and carburetors, and still make 30+ mpg. and i wont look like a douchebag driving it.
F14CRAZY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 12:00 PM   #7 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Drives: C6 Blk M6 Z51 w/NPP
Posts: 2,994
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Tell your brother in law the new VW GTI is about to be released just so he knows up front.

I would have picked the GTI for its world class DSG tranny. (even if its not as fast as the others discussed) I do like the new cobalt SS too...so it would have been a toss up between those two...

Is he getting the DSG Tranny or did he go with a full manual?
__________________
2008 Blk C6 M6 w/Z51 & NPP exhaust

2008 CTS AWD 304hp sports suspension
JBsZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 12:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
genjy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,847
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

The MKVI GTI won't be out in the U.S. for a while... for at least a year or two.

He was originally interested in the DSG, but he is going to get a manual because it's cheaper. I think he wants to learn manual, too.
__________________

2008 5-cylinder turbo hatchback w/ 6sp manual
2006 4-cylinder minivan w/ 5sp manual
genjy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 02:39 PM   #9 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
genjy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,847
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

He bought the car last night. Got a really good deal on it.

2009 VW GTI 6spd manual in United Grey

Base model + iPod adapter



The car is pretty fun to drive. I like the subtle stiffness of the ride. It's perfect--not too harsh and not too soft. I think VW did an awesome job with the GTI's suspension.


We were at the dealership for like 4 hours, and only like 3 other people walked in to look at cars during that time. Pretty sad considering the dealership is in the middle of Downtown LA and it was a Friday night.
__________________

2008 5-cylinder turbo hatchback w/ 6sp manual
2006 4-cylinder minivan w/ 5sp manual

Last edited by genjy : 01-17-2009 at 02:47 PM.
genjy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 04:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
big swede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 5,028
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Quote:
Originally Posted by genjy View Post
He bought the car last night. Got a really good deal on it.

2009 VW GTI 6spd manual in United Grey

Base model + iPod adapter

The car is pretty fun to drive. I like the subtle stiffness of the ride. It's perfect--not too harsh and not too soft. I think VW did an awesome job with the GTI's suspension.


We were at the dealership for like 4 hours, and only like 3 other people walked in to look at cars during that time. Pretty sad considering the dealership is in the middle of Downtown LA and it was a Friday night.
If you ever get a chance to drive it can you give us your impressions compared to your C30.
big swede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 05:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
genjy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,847
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Quote:
Originally Posted by big swede View Post
If you ever get a chance to drive it can you give us your impressions compared to your C30.
I drove it hard a few times last night (to break in the engine and to double-check everything). I clocked about 15 miles.

The 2.0T is very eager. The power is all there from 1300rpm all the way to at least 5500rpm... 2nd-5th all pretty much feel the same.

The C30's power is pretty much bounded within the 3rd and 4th gears, around 25-50mph. The C30 has a lot more passing power and passing acceleration, and the GTI behaves more linearly throughout.

According to published numbers, both cars are basically just as fast. However, I think the 2.0T feels livelier and the T5 feels more serene. They feel very different despite the similar acceleration numbers.

The VW's suspension is sportier and stiffer, but noticeably less comfortable than my C30's setup (the C30's softness is actually a bit too soft). Steering wheel feedback is about the same. The C30 understeers a bit more through turns and corners. And, I can guarantee the Contis on the GTI are sportier tires than the Michelins on the C30.

Interior-wise, the C30 uses better materials throughout the whole cabin. Everything from the clothes, the soft plastic, the hard plastic, and the switch gears feel higher-quality and more durable. But I think the GTI has slightly better fit and finish... the parts look more precisely made and fitted.

The C30 is much quieter inside. Volvo purposely made the C30 quiet, and VW purposely made the GTI loud. Whatever floats your boat, basically.
__________________

2008 5-cylinder turbo hatchback w/ 6sp manual
2006 4-cylinder minivan w/ 5sp manual

Last edited by genjy : 01-17-2009 at 05:34 PM.
genjy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 05:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
big swede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 5,028
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Very interesting comparison, thanks for your insight.
big swede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 01:20 PM   #13 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
member12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Drives: 2007 Silverado 4x4
Posts: 7,629
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Cool that he got a GTI.

I love those cars, but I'd have a difficult time choosing between a Subaru WRX and a 5 door GTI if they were similar in price.

I think he's going to enjoy that Vdub.
member12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 06:29 PM   #14 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
genjy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,847
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

Quote:
Originally Posted by member12 View Post
Cool that he got a GTI.

I love those cars, but I'd have a difficult time choosing between a Subaru WRX and a 5 door GTI if they were similar in price.

I think he's going to enjoy that Vdub.
It was a very good choice.

I think he is going to enjoy the GTI, too. It feels and looks much less boyracer than the WRX and the Speed3.

The GTI seems like an excellent daily driver with just the right amount of sportiness. He doesn't live on the track... so the WRX or the Speed3 would have been a sort of an overkill.
__________________

2008 5-cylinder turbo hatchback w/ 6sp manual
2006 4-cylinder minivan w/ 5sp manual
genjy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 03:13 PM   #15 (permalink)
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 767
Re: 2009 GTI vs. WRX vs. Mazdaspeed3

The older GTIs make great track cars. Nice choice. I agree that the gti is a bit more subtle and if he wanted over-the-top performance, WRX or MPS3 it is.
__________________
Quote:
Originally posted by LAMRONH:
Blind loyalty is nothing more than feel-good mindlessness. I will buy the best possible product with my money.
Htay7500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Reader Car Reviews



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.