![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: S.E. Michigan
Drives: 08 Aura XR
01 S2000
99 VFR
Posts: 3
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Last November as the Malibu was just reaching area dealers, I too decided to compare them with the Aura. After all, same platform must yield same driving experience right? Absolutly! I couldn't find any discernible difference between the LTZ and the XR except when it came to treatment inside the dealerships (Saturn won here BIG time!). Also, Malibu's were being scooped up as soon as they hit the dealer tarmac while Aura's were multiplying each time I scanned dealer inventory. Why? Lack of positive press I guess like they received after the NACOTY last January, where as the Malibu has owned the press for the last two months. Anyway, I chose the Aura (that's it in my avitar) because of the cash incentive of $2250 versus $0 to maybe $500 on the Malibu. Normally, up front cash can lower future residual value, but since I'm keeping my Saturn until it is paid off, that doesn't concern me. I'm enjoying this Aura XR immensely now while smirking at all the "I ordered my 'Bu but the dealer can't tell me when it will be built" posts. They are both excellent GM products, which ever one you decide on will be a smart choice, but I went with the immediate deal and have no regrets.
Last edited by viffer : 12-24-2007 at 07:16 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Oct 2005
Drives: 2005 Cobalt SS
Posts: 5,917
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Quote:
CobaltSScrazy
__________________
2005 Cobalt SS I'm done with GMI, some posters type inexcusable and unacceptable replys that are not moderated with enough intensity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Starship Enterpise
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17,211
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Quote:
The Corvette is for fun, the sedan would be for regular stuff.
__________________
The moderation here gets an F for FAILURE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,387
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
It's funny how GM uses the Malibu as the car you knew GM could build or the car that will save GM when in reality they've already sold the same car for a year with a Saturn badge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Elgin IL
Drives: '72 MC, '76 MC, '79 MC, '81 MC SC & '87 MC LS
Posts: 3,772
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Quote:
Same here. I can't quite put my finger on it, but I've never really warmed up to the malibu's front end. I do like the Aura's front, though.... *shrugs* I'd go with the Saturn Aura instead of the Che@#$let malibu....but, that's just me..... Cort:34swm."Mr Monte Carlo.Mr Road Trip".pig valve.pacemaker WRMNshowcase.lego.HO.model.MCs.RT.CHD = http://www.chevyasylum.com/cort "Somebody snitched on me" ... Barry Gordon ... 'Nuttin' For Christmas' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
70 MPG Two Mode Saturn Hybrid
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 10,834
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Aura looks much better + the dealer experience is reportedly better (important for both purchase and service).
Also you might be able to get the Aura you want faster with all the hype for the Malibu. I would also suppose resales might be better (there are bound to be more Malibus made, and Malibu will most probably bear much more of the fleet burden). |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Omaha Nebraska, USA
Drives: '08 Malibu LT
'94 Plymouth Voyager
Posts: 4,883
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Quote:
![]()
__________________
When you turn your car on....does it return the favor? Past Rides: '90 Lincoln Mark VII '93 Ford Taurus GL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 31
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Thanks for all the replies - they've been very helpful.
I've never even been in a Saturn dealership. Can anyone give me a quick rundown on what makes the Saturn experience better? Also, do you think that the trade in value offered for my '04 Maxx will be any different between the Chevy dealership and the Saturn dealership? I usually use my GM Supplier discount when purchasing new, but do you think the Saturn folks will offer a better price than that? Thanks again! Steven
__________________
If energy and enthusiasm were a substitute for experience and expertise, then I could hire my 11 year old to do this job. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,694
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Quote:
When I bought my first car, it 4 a SL-2, and they let me wash my car whenever I wanted free of charge. They still know me by my first name at the dealership in Whitby even though it has been 10 years since I purchased my car from them. They also had family days with free b-ball tickets etc. Coaster n-3rd would be able to give you a more detailed description, but that was my experience.
__________________
2008 Black Impala LTZ, titanium leather, sunroof, and Bose stereo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Atlanta
Drives: pickup truck
Posts: 5,369
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
As far as long term durability: it's a wash. They run the same mechanicals.
Since you are getting a higher end model with more bells and whistles that can possibly go wrong, then the Aura may have an edge. It's been out for a year already, so model-specific bugs would have been worked out for the 08 model year. I can't imagine any of those being serious though. The trade value for the Maxx might be a little better at the Chevy dealer, but again I don't see it being that much of a difference. The Saturn dealers are supposed to be pretty nice. Either way, it comes down to your drive preferences and color/option choices. The Chevy might be your favorite, but chances are the Saturn dealership will either have the car you want or can get one faster than the Chevy dealer. I just saw a commercial for a $2200 rebate for V6 powered Auras. I think a Chevy dealer could probably match that. Last edited by member12 : 12-25-2007 at 03:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 490
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
i sat in the aura and was very dissapointed, the plastics were very cheap. i would go for the malibu.
another thing i hate about my local saturn dealerships is that they put tint, environmental package (supposedly you dont have to wax for 5 years), and other dealer junk which ends up costing about another extra $1,500.
__________________
Current Cars: 2008 Chevrolet Corvette Manual, 99 Red Firebird Manual- Brother 2007 SAAB 9-3 2.0T- Me 2006 Cadillac STS 3.6- Mom 2008 Subaru WRX STI /1999 Black Pontiac Firebird- other Brother 2003 Cadillac Deville Northstar- Dad Past Cars: 2004 Cadillac CTS 3.6- Me-----> SOLD 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GT- Given to aunt 1994 GMC Safari- Sold 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme- Donated Last edited by ctsmo : 12-26-2007 at 02:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Drives: 1996 Dodge 3500 CTD 4x4
1992 Camaro RS 305
Posts: 3,303
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
at the mall on saturday they had both a new Malibu LTZ and a Saturn Aura XR. This was my first time in either vehicle, and although the new Malibu is heads and tails better than the previous gen Bu, I much prefered the Aura. The new Malibu was very nice, but I think I expected more from it beause of all the hype, but it was a very nice car, especially for one under $30k. But just something about it was unappealing to me, I much perfered the Aura. That being said I have never done anymore than sit in them for a few minutes, so a drive may change that???? But first impressions I would take the Saturn!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
70 MPG Two Mode Saturn Hybrid
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 10,834
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NC
Drives: '97 Maxima SE
Posts: 997
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
Yes, there actually is.
Have you sat in both of them to know?
__________________
'97 Maxima SE--5-speed, sunroof VUE I4a--alloys, S&S pkg Entourage SE--Premium Pkg www.street-car.net <-any car fan forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 5,059 Miles SE of Dutch Harbor
Drives: 2008 Saturn Aura XE 2.4 I-4
Posts: 3,860
|
Re: Aura XR compared to Malibu LTZ
I have and sell one of them.
The primary interior materials are exactly the same. Upper dash is a soft touch rubbery like material. Door panels and door arm rests are made of the same soft touch material. The plastics that run out of the occupants usual range of touch are again, exactly the same. GM did not source different materials for the Malibu over the Aura. Even the wood is the same plastic laminate. No difference.
__________________
'I've seen the next Cadillac STS replacement and it looks damn good... like a ****ing Bentley.' - Unclassified GM exec. 'I had no respect for the 55 mph limit and I took great delight in breaking the limit I can assure you.' www.32hours7minutes.com |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|