GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Saturn Discussion
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-2008, 10:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
caddycruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern Delaware
Drives: '08 Pontiac G6 GT Coupe
Posts: 662
2009 Aura Changes Posted

Aura:
Deletions

(QPE) P215/60R16 touring, blackwall tires
(QAD) P225/50R17 touring, blackwall tires
(QD1) 16" 5-spoke machined alloy wheels
(LZ4) 3.5L Variable Valve Timing V6 engine
(NW9) traction control
(MN5) 4-speed automatic transmission
Exterior color (15U) Golden Cashmere
Exterior color (40U) Cream White
Exterior color (53U) Bronzed Pewter
Exterior color (67U) Silver Pearl
(19B) Black cloth

New Features

(QGG) P215/55R17 touring, blackwall tires are standard on all models but XR V6 Sedan
Exterior paint color (17U) Quick Silver
Exterior paint color (50U) Polar White
Exterior paint color (51U) Gold Mist
Exterior paint color (92U) Silver Moss
(UPF) Bluetooth for phone, personal cell phone connectivity to vehicle audio system is included and only available with (PCM) Preferred Package on XE Sedan and standard on XR Sedans

Changes

ZZV69 is now the XR 4-cylinder model
ZZX69 is the XR V6 model

Aura Greenline:
Deletions
(QPE) P215/60R16 touring, blackwall tires
(QD1) 16" 5-spoke machined alloy wheels
Exterior color (15U) Golden Cashmere
Exterior color (40U) Cream White
Exterior color (53U) Bronzed Pewter
Exterior color (67U) Silver Pearl

New Features

Exterior paint color (17U) Quick Silver
Exterior paint color (50U) Polar White
Exterior paint color (51U) Gold Mist
Exterior paint color (92U) Silver Moss
(UPF) Bluetooth for phone, personal cell phone connectivity to vehicle audio system is included and only available with (PCM) Preferred Package
(QGG) P215/55R17 touring, blackwall tires
(PFG) Wheels 17" (43.2 cm) twin-spoke machined alloy


As talked about before, no more 3.5L and now the 2.4L is standard in both XE and XR trims--and gets the 6-speed on ALL, unlike the Malibu which still uses the 4-speed on some trims. Also, Bluetooth on everything.

Pretty good, especially the XR-4 which a lot of people have been wishing for, and though some may carp about the 3.5L going away...everyone who drives a 2.4L Aura seems to love it, and it will only help with CAFE, etc.
__________________
Mom: '08 Malibu 2LT 4-cyl
Dad: '92 Roadmaster LTD, '93 Fleetwood Brougham (FOR SALE), '96 Subaru Legacy Wagon
Brother: '86 Regal LTD
ME: '08 G6 GT Coupe
Pictures

Last edited by caddycruiser : 03-29-2008 at 10:38 AM.
caddycruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-29-2008, 11:01 AM   #2 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Drives: 2001 ZO6 TTP 224/224 114lsa Cam Pkg 396rwhp 380 rw
Posts: 1,822
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Thanks for the heads up.

JB
__________________
2008 Blk C6 M6 w/Z51 & NPP exhaust

2008 CTS AWD 304hp sports suspension
JBsZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 11:44 AM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Troy, MI
Drives: 08 Mazda 3 Sport
Posts: 37
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

no traction control?
Also very excited to see GM updating this product with what people want (I4 XR). Are we not going to see a MCE for the Aura for 09?
and bluetooth is over rated!
diurnal618 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 02:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 275
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

It's definitely great to see that GM finally dropped the 4-speed auto entirely from the Aura lineup for 2009, and I also think it was a smart move to drop the 3500 as well. The 2.4 Ecotec/6-spd auto combo will get better mileage with most likely equal or better performance than the 3500, and with the new NVH refinements GM made to the 2.4 Ecotec it will probably be smoother and quieter than the 3500 as well.

And although you could argue that a 3500/6-spd auto combo would of been better performing than the 2.4/6-spd auto combo, you have to remember that the Aura and Saturn as a whole is suppose to be GM's import fighter, and most import-buyers are NOT looking for a pushrod motor under their hood. And even though many consumers don't really know the difference between OHV and OHC, thanks to the media many consumers will be immediately turned off to any "import-alternative" vehicle that is equipped with an OHV motor, plain and simple. The truth is that most import buyers think "anemic, unrefined, and outdated" when they think of pushrod, regardless of the relative advantage the 3500 holds over the 2.4 Ecotec in performance.

Also with gas prices predicted to reach $4-$5 a gallon in many parts of the U.S., it isn't really surprising that GM would do away with the 3500 and make the 2.4 Ecotec/6spd auto their complete base model powertrain.
crazyjkz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 07:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
caddycruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern Delaware
Drives: '08 Pontiac G6 GT Coupe
Posts: 662
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazyjkz View Post
It's definitely great to see that GM finally dropped the 4-speed auto entirely from the Aura lineup for 2009, and I also think it was a smart move to drop the 3500 as well. The 2.4 Ecotec/6-spd auto combo will get better mileage with most likely equal or better performance than the 3500, and with the new NVH refinements GM made to the 2.4 Ecotec it will probably be smoother and quieter than the 3500 as well.

And although you could argue that a 3500/6-spd auto combo would of been better performing than the 2.4/6-spd auto combo, you have to remember that the Aura and Saturn as a whole is suppose to be GM's import fighter, and most import-buyers are NOT looking for a pushrod motor under their hood. And even though many consumers don't really know the difference between OHV and OHC, thanks to the media many consumers will be immediately turned off to any "import-alternative" vehicle that is equipped with an OHV motor, plain and simple. The truth is that most import buyers think "anemic, unrefined, and outdated" when they think of pushrod, regardless of the relative advantage the 3500 holds over the 2.4 Ecotec in performance.

Also with gas prices predicted to reach $4-$5 a gallon in many parts of the U.S., it isn't really surprising that GM would do away with the 3500 and make the 2.4 Ecotec/6spd auto their complete base model powertrain.
You took the words out of my mouth, exactly

As we currently own an '08 Malibu 2.4L with the 4-speed, and are pleased to pieces, I'm still anxious to see what the 6-speed does with it (not holding onto the spaced out gears so long will be a help), and am waiting on the first of the late '08 LTZ-4 Malibus to show up to take a drive.

Not a whole lot changed with the Aura, but the main issues were models and packaging...and they've properly fixed that.
__________________
Mom: '08 Malibu 2LT 4-cyl
Dad: '92 Roadmaster LTD, '93 Fleetwood Brougham (FOR SALE), '96 Subaru Legacy Wagon
Brother: '86 Regal LTD
ME: '08 G6 GT Coupe
Pictures
caddycruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 08:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
likearock00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NC
Drives: 2006 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab Z-71
Posts: 7,503
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Yeah bluetooth......and new colors. Great.
__________________
"Moral courage is the most valuable and usually the most absent characteristic in men." -Patton
likearock00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 08:05 PM   #7 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
ronald mcretard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,644
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

good info... got anything on the Astra?
ronald mcretard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 09:45 PM   #8 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
TheGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 865
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Good move on the transmission and 3.5 delete.
__________________
2007 Mazda3 i Touring
1991 Ford Tempo GL Retired!

Note: most of the parts on my Mazda3 say FoMoCo
TheGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 11:23 PM   #9 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
autofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Drives: 2008 Saturn Sky 2007 Saturn Aura XR
Posts: 834
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

I loved the XR 4-cyl idea but there are some features from the V6 XR that won't be available at any price: no fog lights, no auto climate control, and a downgrade to 17" wheels (like the 4-cyl Malibu LTZ). Why? I'd like a 4-cyl Aura XR or Malibu LTZ loaded just like their V6 siblings. GM can't fully understand that "premium" and "4-cylinder" can be synonymous.
autofan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 11:45 PM   #10 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
Aerodynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pembroke, Ontario
Drives: 1998 Ford Escort SE 5-spd Sedan
Posts: 1,540
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Cool. Bluetooth AND the 2.4 I4 + 6spd combo. I'm curious to see what the mpg figures of this drivetrain will be.
__________________
Wanted:
☻ Mini Cooper S, 6MT
Saturn Astra XR, 3-Door 5MT
.? Chevrolet Beat, 5MT.

Current:
☻ 1998 Ford Escort LX, "Sport" Sedan 5MT

Previous:
1991 Chrysler Daytona Shelby 2.5L Turbo, 3AT
1989 Plymouth Sundance, Sedan 3AT
1979 Chevrolet Scottsdale Reg Cab, 2WD 350ci 4bbl AT
Aerodynamix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 11:35 AM   #11 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 275
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by caddycruiser View Post
You took the words out of my mouth, exactly

As we currently own an '08 Malibu 2.4L with the 4-speed, and are pleased to pieces, I'm still anxious to see what the 6-speed does with it (not holding onto the spaced out gears so long will be a help), and am waiting on the first of the late '08 LTZ-4 Malibus to show up to take a drive.

Not a whole lot changed with the Aura, but the main issues were models and packaging...and they've properly fixed that.
If gas prices really do jump up to the $4-$5 per gallon price range this summer as many economists have predicted I'm seriously considering trading in my 3500VVT-equipped 2007 Aura XE for a 2009 Aura with the 2.4 Ecotec/6-spd auto combo. I'm very curious to see what the mpg and performance figures will be with the 2.4/6spd auto powertrain, but logically one would have to assume that they will be improved over the current 2.4/4spd auto combo.

The bottom line is that what GM did with the Aura's powertrain options for 2009 shows that they are finally truly understanding what the consumer majority desires when they are looking for an alternative to an Altima or Camcord. Doing away with the 4spd auto and the 3500 pushrod completely and having the 2.4/6spd auto as the base powertrain and leaving the 3.6/6spd auto as the sole V6 powertrain for the higher-end models was a very smart move by GM and this will do wonders in continuing to improve their brand images, reducing criticism from the media, and improving customer satisfaction.

The next step GM needs to take with the Aura's powertrains for next year is to make the 3.6 DI standard on the XR with around 280-300hp and conjure up a DI-version of the 2.4L Ecotec with around 190-200hp. GM is going to have to do this for the 2010 model year with ALL of their Epsilon cars if they are serious about competing with fwd midsize sedan competition in the years to come. Making the 6-speed auto standard across the board was a great move, but GM simply cannot stop there if they are serious about competing with the imports, plain and simple.

Last edited by crazyjkz : 03-30-2008 at 11:55 AM.
crazyjkz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 12:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
TheGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 865
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Close to the hybrid model which is 24/32. Which isn't bad considering the aura weighs 3500 pounds
__________________
2007 Mazda3 i Touring
1991 Ford Tempo GL Retired!

Note: most of the parts on my Mazda3 say FoMoCo
TheGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 03:27 PM   #13 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
coaster.n3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 5,059 Miles SE of Dutch Harbor
Drives: 2008 Saturn Aura XE 2.4 I-4 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt
Posts: 3,794
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

09 is gonna be a good year.
__________________
'I've seen the next Cadillac STS replacement and it looks damn good... like a ****ing Bentley.' - Unclassified GM exec.


'I had no respect for the 55 mph limit and I took great delight in breaking the limit I can assure you.'

www.32hours7minutes.com
coaster.n3rd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 04:13 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Troy, MI
Drives: 08 Mazda 3 Sport
Posts: 37
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by autofan View Post
I loved the XR 4-cyl idea but there are some features from the V6 XR that won't be available at any price: no fog lights, no auto climate control, and a downgrade to 17" wheels (like the 4-cyl Malibu LTZ). Why? I'd like a 4-cyl Aura XR or Malibu LTZ loaded just like their V6 siblings. GM can't fully understand that "premium" and "4-cylinder" can be synonymous.
If that is true its very sad. thats what makes the XR different from the XE. fog lights, auto climate and the wheels! What are the other differences?
diurnal618 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 06:02 PM   #15 (permalink)
Starship Enterpise
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17,204
Re: 2009 Aura Changes Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by autofan View Post
I loved the XR 4-cyl idea but there are some features from the V6 XR that won't be available at any price: no fog lights, no auto climate control, and a downgrade to 17" wheels (like the 4-cyl Malibu LTZ). Why? I'd like a 4-cyl Aura XR or Malibu LTZ loaded just like their V6 siblings. GM can't fully understand that "premium" and "4-cylinder" can be synonymous.
Probably has nothing to do with what they think, but rather getting suppliers to make additional variations in wiring harnesses as well as setting up the assembly line to make these additional variants.
__________________
The moderation here gets an F for FAILURE.
DuSpinnst is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Saturn Discussion



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.