![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: 5,059 Miles SE of Dutch Harbor
Drives: 2008 Saturn Aura XE 2.4 I-4
Posts: 3,861
|
Re: Could Lambda II use 4-cyls?
Quote:
However... a T/C'd 4 banger.... Probably... The problem is torque would not be made at low ends, and the lambda's are pretty heavy... lightening the load would sacrifice quite a bit. Towing would also be out of the question.
__________________
'I've seen the next Cadillac STS replacement and it looks damn good... like a ****ing Bentley.' - Unclassified GM exec. 'I had no respect for the 55 mph limit and I took great delight in breaking the limit I can assure you.' www.32hours7minutes.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 486
|
Re: Could Lambda II use 4-cyls?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Roseville, CA
Drives: 2003 Chrysler Town & Country
2005 Chevy Malibu
Posts: 837
|
Re: Could Lambda II use 4-cyls?
I would think the 2.8 liter V6 turbo would be a better fit. Still have low end torque and get good highway numbers. Here is a link to the graph of torque/hp. And here are specs for a little hotter 2.8 turbo. Of course, when they come out with the 3.0 specs, this could all be moot.
Here is the link for the 2.3 liter turbo graph.
__________________
Erik Last edited by psece : 09-28-2008 at 11:31 AM. Reason: Added 2.3 graph |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: France
Drives: 2007 MBK Flipper Scooter
Posts: 13,397
|
Re: Could Lambda II use 4-cyls?
I can't believe for a second that a next generation of Lambda will be lighter. Have any vehicles ever gotten lighter in newer generations? With ever-increasing safety requirements and peoples demands for more and more goodies, they will only get heavier.
__________________
The department of redundancy department.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 486
|
Re: Could Lambda II use 4-cyls?
right,but gm has some very heavy platforms, that are losing weight. Theta II is lighter than theta I, so why not make the lambdas lose weight? is the 2.3 ecotec in the equinnox a new engine or is it the same one the guy above paul posted?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dundee, Oregon
Drives: 2006 HHR 2LT
Posts: 928
|
Re: Could Lambda II use 4-cyls?
Lighter for Lambda II might be 200 to 500 pounds. Not enough to be able to downscale much in torque or horsepower. The better question: will the next generation have a Hybrid & Flexfuel option?
__________________
The U.S. trade deficit with China increases by $1 billion a day The U.S. trade deficit for automobiles alone is $11 billion per month http://americaneconomicalert.org/ For every one transplant job added in the US, nearly five jobs are eliminated |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|