![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 946
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Quote:
4100 lbs is way off anything I've ever seen published for a stock Mustang GT convertible. In fact, the quoted weight for the V8 convertible is around 3600 lbs everywhere I've looked. Not sure why you're measuring such a difference. Perhaps the scales being used simply aren't that accurate or are not properly calibrated. Perhaps it's how the two are being measured .. not sure if the official measure includes all fluids (gas weights 6 lbs per gallon so a full tank can be a difference of nearly 100 lbs) or if your measure includes the driver (obviously, that would boost the measure by a couple of hundred lbs). Also, not sure if your GT is stock -- bigger wheels can weigh more as do some other mods. The Shelby GT500 convertible does weigh in at over 4000 lbs mostly because it uses an iron block and has the extra weight of the supercharger. That and heavier duty parts (bigger brakes and wheels weigh more) add a lot of weight. Last edited by Tone : 07-03-2008 at 12:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 197
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Hurray for Ford! Offering a high output 4 banger is a smart move! This means Mustang will survive this lastest gas crisis while Camaro and Challenger will be canceled (once again) by2012. Now hopefully Ford will have the sense to downsize the car over the next decade like it did in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,246
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Quote:
The Camaro will actually weigh 3500 lbs, get 30mpg, get to 60 in 4.8 seconds, and outsell the Mustang 2 to 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Andrews,NC
Drives: 2002 Silverado Z71
1987 IROC-Z
1993 S-10 4 x 4
Posts: 51
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Quote:
I would not trade you the wheels off of my Camaro for every mustang you could park in Andrews, NC. You can wash 'em, scrub 'em & powder them well but you can't get rid of that ford smell! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,246
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 37
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Quote:
And from spending time underneath both a S197 Mustang and a 4th and 3rd gen f-body, GM could (and hopefully has) learned a lot from the simplicity Ford designed in to the Mustang's chassis. Most things are easily reached and most service is easy to perform. It basically has a "nascar" rear and a BMW M3 (E36) front. I hope the new Camaro has IRS, but if it weighs 4000lbs I'll have to rethink my purchase plans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Grand Blanc, MI
Drives: 1987 Regal Turbo-T
2000 Camaro SS
2006 Trailblaz
Posts: 77
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Well, I arguably see more modified s197 cars than anyone in the midwest where I work. I am not certain why there is a discrepency in the weights you are seeing, but I can assure you, ours were weighed without drived. As far as the scaled we have our own 4 corner scale, it has been to Skinny Kid's scales, and Milan Dragway's scales...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,246
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,641
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
Quote:
Also, considering the Camaro is going to be pushing 4,000 pounds, this Mustang should do quite well. Ford needs a winner and this will be it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Illinois
Drives: 1997 Mazda B2300 5-spd.
Posts: 604
|
Re: SVO Badge To Return For 2010 Ford Mustang
This is a good option, but I'm glad its not replacing the entry level v8. The weight difference from the 4 cylinder is likely to be 200-250 lbs which is good. However, is it just me, or does nobody ever take sound into the equation when comparing a N/A v8 to turbo'd 6 or 4 cylinder. I'm pretty sure there's a reason that in general, mustang/car commercials make sure to use v8 sound clips and not clips from a loud 4 or 6 cylinder.
![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|