|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-04-2004, 02:10 AM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10
|
I'm very dissapointed with Ford, these cars just don't do anything for me personally. Something is different between the mustang concept photos released, and this production version. If ford keeps pumping out losers like these, GM will have no problem staying ahead.
|
|
|
|
01-04-2004, 05:47 AM
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
2.5L Iron Duke
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 16
|
The Ford 5 hundred to me looks like the unholy spawn of the 2005 Focus and the Current Taurus its too similer looking to FORDS current crap, the mustang i admit is a step key word step in the right direction but Atleast GM is improving Fords just going nowhere cept down, and that BRONCO i got one thing to say NO!!!! :P
__________________
CHEVROLET RULES!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
01-04-2004, 10:05 AM
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 5
|
Ford has nothing to offer me for at least the next 5 years. The production Mustang is just a vestige of the great design ideas brought out in the concept. Their distilled it to its worst points.
__________________
2001 Infiniti G20t 1998 Ford SVT Contour 1988 Saab 900 Turbo 1974 MGB GT |
|
|
|
|
01-04-2004, 11:18 AM
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,721
|
The Five-Hundred concept was alot better than this production version. I'm not sure what happened there. The Mustang, though, inside and out, is great. It's one of the few domestic cars in years that makes me want to buy. Looking at it convinces me that the retro touches are a good idea for these new pony cars. I hope it sells well, because that might inspire GM to do a tough-looking Camaro of their own.
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2004, 11:45 AM
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 129
|
500 sucks. Nothing to discuss. What's new about a Passat knock-off with a subpar interior.
Mustang looks great from front, side and 3/4 front. Don't like the view shown here though. Hate the back end, but you can't have the 70's front w/o the 70's rear I guess. Still hate the B-pillar treatment. Too thick and window too small. Doesn't have the scale it should. Bronco - Nice mini-Hummer.
__________________
BLACKBeast 2006 300C SRT-8 Dyno - 401rwhp 411rwtq (factory freak) Option I, II, Kicker, Sunroof Magnaflow mid-pipes and catback, Mopar CAI, Xenon Fogs, KW V2's and Hotchkis Swaybars, SRT-8 Mats, SRT-8 Drilled Pedals, SRT-8 logo'd hood and trunk liner |
|
|
|
|
01-04-2004, 03:35 PM
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
2.5L Iron Duke
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 26
|
The Mustang and Bronco are sharp, but I have to agree with other posts and say that the 500 looks way too much like a current Taurus mixed with a Passat. That imitation wood trim in the interior looks terrible. Ford can't expect to catch up, and beat the import sedans by aiming where they stand now, and then falling a little short. If Ford keeps building sedans that look like that, Chevy will have no problems.
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2004, 06:02 PM
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 843
|
Quote:
__________________
2005 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx 1993 Oldsmobile Bravada GM, Then and Now... Before you go and buy a import brand car because of the perception of quality, do a little research and you will find GM has as good or better quality than most of those other brands. It's not cool to hate America people! |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
