![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,936
|
I'm not sure what the appeal is about either one of these cars. I can think of other vehicles in both segments that I find better styled and more fun to drive than other one of these. Alas, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,193
|
Ok, the Crossfire doesn't look so bad in vert form. But seriously, why can't the PT Cruiser just die already? I never liked it, and the more they do to it, the more it seems like something that should have been discontinued a long time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 713
|
The PT remains odd, but the Crossfire is sexy as hell.
__________________
99 MPFI S10, 04 GP, 07 TB (S10 getting a SyTy turbo!) http://www.Highflow.com/ http://www.TheHEMI.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
GMI Mod/Camaro Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,541
|
The Crossfire is deffinatly nice looking as a Vert. I was hoping to see the 'fire get a hard top vert like its chassis sister. I guess it looks like MB had to spice up there SLK becaue honesly, I would get a crossfire over and SLK anyday, even with the new design. The new SLK looks like it has downs.
and as for the PT Cruser... theres only room for one retro 2 seater convertable on this block, and we got it down with a hard top and a V8.
__________________
![]() Any Inside Info? Questions or Coments? Ideas? Email me at BigAl@GMInsidenews.com 1993 Caprice 9C1 1987 Camaro Z28 1972 Camaro RS |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In front of the PC!
Posts: 1,960
|
wow, the crosfire looks like it needs a pair of lowering sprngs, especialy at the rear! the rear end is horrible, for sure it needed some sort of duck tail.
and why the slk can have a "hard top" and this junk not? the pt looks better than the beetle conv. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Drives: 2009 Camry Hybrid (company car)
Posts: 11,787
|
Quote:
__________________
Sure, I drive a Toyota, but at least I don't have to pay for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Drives: 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora 3.5
Posts: 9,848
|
The crossfire looks much better, cept the trunk lid is a bit choppy for a vert. The tailights are a nice change though.
The PT Cruiser on the other had is hideous, what is up with the strange steering wheel? The interior looks like it came out of a dentists office...and the rear looks like you could haul a few bodies in there, its so flat!! Ughhhhh, the cocnept version was better... ![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,874
|
Crossfire- Great vehicle. I think I'll like the covertible better than the coupe.
P.S. The MB looks uglier than the Crossfire. No wonder they're making it cuter PT Cruiser- DIE! DIE! DIE! :plasma: :zap: |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|