![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP
2009 Ford Focus SEL
Posts: 14,965
|
DETROIT - Ford Motor Co. is studying three existing platforms to figure out a way to build the Bronco SUV concept shown at the North American International Auto Show.
The Bronco, if approved for production, would give Ford Division a low-priced SUV below the Escape in size and price. Candidates are the platforms that underpin the Escape, the Brazilian-made EcoSport sport wagon and the Ranger pickup, says J Mays, Ford group vice president of design. The first two are unibody platforms, and the third is an aging body-on-frame platform. Phil Martens, Ford's product development chief, says the Bronco must be built off an existing platform if approved. That sentiment reflects Ford's renewed discipline on platform sharing, parts carry-over and budget-minded product development. The 2005 Escape starts at $19,855, including destination charges. That suggests prices for a production Bronco would start at around $18,000 or less. The tough, spare look of the Bronco concept, penned by designer Joe Baker, evokes the original Bronco introduced in 1965. Ford wanted to return to "the idea of an SUV as a piece of equipment rather than a status symbol," Mays said. "All of the SUVs in this hall (at the Detroit show) are status symbols. That's not what the SUV was at its inception." Off-road capability is important, Ford executives say. The concept Bronco is built on the Escape platform. Ford executives stressed that the Escape can go off-road. But "if the stars were right, I would prefer to have it on a body-on-frame," Mays said.That points to the Ranger platform. But it is old; the Ranger's last major redesign came in 1993. And Ford COO Nick Scheele said the Ranger frame probably is too big for the Bronco. Read More |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 713
|
The Bronco would be smaller than the Escape? Hmmm.
__________________
99 MPFI S10, 04 GP, 07 TB (S10 getting a SyTy turbo!) http://www.Highflow.com/ http://www.TheHEMI.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: @ home in my room
Posts: 1,937
|
:lol: Return of the Bronco II...good going Ford!
__________________
Current line up: 1987 Buick Regal S/W 1987 Pontiac Trans AM 1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula 1998 Ford Windstar 1998 Subaru Impreza Wagon 1998 Chevy Camaro Z-28 2004 Chevorlet Trailblazer And further down the road: 2k4 Cadillac CTS V. Those gone but not forgotten: 1991 Ford Taurus 1993 Chevy Lumina --ME-- |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Springfield, MO
Drives: 2004 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport 5-speed.
Posts: 3,164
|
What bugs me is the Bronco as SUV-equipment over SUV-status. Yeah, part of the appeal of the SUV is its "equipment" utility, but the rougher-riding body-on-frame SUV's (Wrangler, Tracker), take a back seat to the unibodies.
That said, the Bronco is a very cool concept, and very loyal to its heritage. The first-gen Broncos (B1's?) have a lot of fans, my whole family included. I think that it would have a lot more "Real 4x4" appeal than the Liberty, and it would be very attractive to the ZR2 Blazer fans, especially if the price goals can be met. Dunno how many they can sell, I like the idea of having to seek out a bunch of mud so that I can use my cheap, tough-looking real off-roader. With the Colorado platform seemingly upmarket of where the Bronco would show up, and the Kappa not being 4x4-capable, Ford might have the market to themselves with a future Ranger platform. Ghrankenstein
__________________
NEW RIDE: 2008 Carp Poseidon (for fish-head delivery)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HOUSTON
Drives: 02 impala
Posts: 2,090
|
what are those people at ford thinking.. "lets bring back and name that has a strong history of rollovers, tire seperation and lets make it really small so it'll be crushed by real SUV's" or was that the explorer.. ahhhhhhhh who cares, just sounds like another mistake by ford, lets root em out.. maybe they'll bring back the probe while there at it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 135
|
The Bronco being more tinny than the Escape. That sounds lame. I think Ford needs a tough rugged 4x4. That is what the Bronco initially was. The Explorer and Expedition to me seem more like a freeway-type 4x4. Something you may take skiing, but not something you would use do keep track of your farm, or do some hard core off-roading.
The F250 and F350 are tough and rugged, I can see the Bronco following along those lines. Well, that's my opinion.
__________________
1979 Chevy Van 1978 Pontiac Firebird 1985 GMC Jimmy S-15 1992 Pontiac Grand Am 1998 Oldsmobile Intrigue 2002 Chevrolet Camaro Z-28 1972 Chevrolet C-10 Deluxe Pickup "Sometimes you gotta say, 'Whatt the f***". 'What the f***', gives you freedom, freedom creates opportunity, opportunity - makes your future." - from 'Risky Business' |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Either Mc Donalds or Computer
Posts: 327
|
Hello Im a new in the forum comments. I strive to be a non-bioast car enthusest. I have to admit I like the looks of the Bronco concept (style wize). Looks Like a fun sized Tonka truck for grown ups. I understand ford's rep may not be all that great right now from their past and such, but It looks like ford is actually starting to do some good and may be seting up for a turn around these days. This bronco I read is to compete with the popular Jeep wrangler. The Wrangler is also a small capable and "tough" off-roader. I'm actually happy for Ford, But well have to wait & see about their actuall production model before we get too dissapointed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3
|
As a hard core Early Bronco enthusiast, I was excited to hear that Ford is doing something with the Bronco nameplate, but I'm dismayed to now hear that it might be a unibodied smaller than Escape sized vehicle. The original Bronco was made to be a serious off road vehicle to compete with Jeep. The new vehicle needs to do the same thing. It needs to be simple, rugged, on frame, and easy to modify. A vehicle with a solid front axle would be great. It needs to be a vehicle that can kick the crap out of the Jeep Rubicon. It hurts to read this new news...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 713
|
Seeing Bronco IIs on 3 wheels on city streets
was not an uncommon sight during the 1990s. Those things were dangerous as hell.
__________________
99 MPFI S10, 04 GP, 07 TB (S10 getting a SyTy turbo!) http://www.Highflow.com/ http://www.TheHEMI.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 960
|
Quote:
I definately agree that if they build a new bronco, it needs to be body on frame and solid front axel all the way! There's already enough sissy 'off-road' suvs out there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Either Mc Donalds or Computer
Posts: 327
|
any who one knows photoshop want to put OJ in the new bronco And post it for "heretage" reflections?
:roflmao: This bronco Is suppost to be on the supportive side of technology. Ranger Ain't Technology prone enough to be shared. Do it right or Dont Do it at all is what I say. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,720
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|