GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > The Competition
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2004, 07:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
nsap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP 2009 Ford Focus SEL
Posts: 14,965
DETROIT - Ford Motor Co. is studying three existing platforms to figure out a way to build the Bronco SUV concept shown at the North American International Auto Show.

The Bronco, if approved for production, would give Ford Division a low-priced SUV below the Escape in size and price. Candidates are the platforms that underpin the Escape, the Brazilian-made EcoSport sport wagon and the Ranger pickup, says J Mays, Ford group vice president of design. The first two are unibody platforms, and the third is an aging body-on-frame platform.

Phil Martens, Ford's product development chief, says the Bronco must be built off an existing platform if approved. That sentiment reflects Ford's renewed discipline on platform sharing, parts carry-over and budget-minded product development.

The 2005 Escape starts at $19,855, including destination charges. That suggests prices for a production Bronco would start at around $18,000 or less.

The tough, spare look of the Bronco concept, penned by designer Joe Baker, evokes the original Bronco introduced in 1965. Ford wanted to return to "the idea of an SUV as a piece of equipment rather than a status symbol," Mays said. "All of the SUVs in this hall (at the Detroit show) are status symbols. That's not what the SUV was at its inception."

Off-road capability is important, Ford executives say. The concept Bronco is built on the Escape platform. Ford executives stressed that the Escape can go off-road.

But "if the stars were right, I would prefer to have it on a body-on-frame," Mays said.That points to the Ranger platform. But it is old; the Ranger's last major redesign came in 1993. And Ford COO Nick Scheele said the Ranger frame probably is too big for the Bronco.


Read More
__________________

E-Mail Me

Engine Guide Updated!! -- Revised layout, more info., up-to-date
nsap is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-19-2004, 09:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 713
The Bronco would be smaller than the Escape? Hmmm.
__________________
99 MPFI S10, 04 GP, 07 TB
(S10 getting a SyTy turbo!)

http://www.Highflow.com/
http://www.TheHEMI.com/
thehemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 12:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
casket_demon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: @ home in my room
Posts: 1,937
:lol: Return of the Bronco II...good going Ford!
__________________
Current line up:
1987 Buick Regal S/W
1987 Pontiac Trans AM
1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula
1998 Ford Windstar
1998 Subaru Impreza Wagon
1998 Chevy Camaro Z-28
2004 Chevorlet Trailblazer
And further down the road: 2k4 Cadillac CTS V.

Those gone but not forgotten:
1991 Ford Taurus
1993 Chevy Lumina






--ME--
casket_demon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 12:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
 
Ghrankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Springfield, MO
Drives: 2004 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport 5-speed.
Posts: 3,164
What bugs me is the Bronco as SUV-equipment over SUV-status. Yeah, part of the appeal of the SUV is its "equipment" utility, but the rougher-riding body-on-frame SUV's (Wrangler, Tracker), take a back seat to the unibodies.

That said, the Bronco is a very cool concept, and very loyal to its heritage. The first-gen Broncos (B1's?) have a lot of fans, my whole family included. I think that it would have a lot more "Real 4x4" appeal than the Liberty, and it would be very attractive to the ZR2 Blazer fans, especially if the price goals can be met.

Dunno how many they can sell, I like the idea of having to seek out a bunch of mud so that I can use my cheap, tough-looking real off-roader. With the Colorado platform seemingly upmarket of where the Bronco would show up, and the Kappa not being 4x4-capable, Ford might have the market to themselves with a future Ranger platform.

Ghrankenstein
__________________
NEW RIDE: 2008 Carp Poseidon (for fish-head delivery)


Ghrankenstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 01:30 PM   #5 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
IMPALAon20s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: HOUSTON
Drives: 02 impala
Posts: 2,090
what are those people at ford thinking.. "lets bring back and name that has a strong history of rollovers, tire seperation and lets make it really small so it'll be crushed by real SUV's" or was that the explorer.. ahhhhhhhh who cares, just sounds like another mistake by ford, lets root em out.. maybe they'll bring back the probe while there at it.
IMPALAon20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 04:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 135
The Bronco being more tinny than the Escape. That sounds lame. I think Ford needs a tough rugged 4x4. That is what the Bronco initially was. The Explorer and Expedition to me seem more like a freeway-type 4x4. Something you may take skiing, but not something you would use do keep track of your farm, or do some hard core off-roading.

The F250 and F350 are tough and rugged, I can see the Bronco following along those lines.

Well, that's my opinion.
__________________
1979 Chevy Van
1978 Pontiac Firebird
1985 GMC Jimmy S-15
1992 Pontiac Grand Am
1998 Oldsmobile Intrigue
2002 Chevrolet Camaro Z-28
1972 Chevrolet C-10 Deluxe Pickup

"Sometimes you gotta say, 'Whatt the f***". 'What the f***', gives you freedom, freedom creates opportunity, opportunity - makes your future." - from 'Risky Business'
NewMexico_Sunset_On_RT66_Yep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2004, 06:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Either Mc Donalds or Computer
Posts: 327
Hello Im a new in the forum comments. I strive to be a non-bioast car enthusest. I have to admit I like the looks of the Bronco concept (style wize). Looks Like a fun sized Tonka truck for grown ups. I understand ford's rep may not be all that great right now from their past and such, but It looks like ford is actually starting to do some good and may be seting up for a turn around these days. This bronco I read is to compete with the popular Jeep wrangler. The Wrangler is also a small capable and "tough" off-roader. I'm actually happy for Ford, But well have to wait & see about their actuall production model before we get too dissapointed.
xellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 01:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
Walking
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3
As a hard core Early Bronco enthusiast, I was excited to hear that Ford is doing something with the Bronco nameplate, but I'm dismayed to now hear that it might be a unibodied smaller than Escape sized vehicle. The original Bronco was made to be a serious off road vehicle to compete with Jeep. The new vehicle needs to do the same thing. It needs to be simple, rugged, on frame, and easy to modify. A vehicle with a solid front axle would be great. It needs to be a vehicle that can kick the crap out of the Jeep Rubicon. It hurts to read this new news...
zhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 02:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
philsshon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 284
i like the idea of a new bronco, but base it on the ranger, and get it to production soon.
philsshon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 04:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 713
Seeing Bronco IIs on 3 wheels on city streets
was not an uncommon sight during the 1990s.
Those things were dangerous as hell.
__________________
99 MPFI S10, 04 GP, 07 TB
(S10 getting a SyTy turbo!)

http://www.Highflow.com/
http://www.TheHEMI.com/
thehemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 04:49 PM   #11 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 680
I hope they get OJ as a spokes person.
__________________
blank, blankity, blank, blank, blank.
sykboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 05:00 PM   #12 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 960
Quote:
Originally posted by thehemi@Jan 20 2004, 02:34 PM
Seeing Bronco IIs on 3 wheels on city streets
was not an uncommon sight during the 1990s.
Those things were dangerous as hell.
A simple driving course and learning the limits of your vehicle will fix that.

I definately agree that if they build a new bronco, it needs to be body on frame and solid front axel all the way! There's already enough sissy 'off-road' suvs out there.
Dumb_Ass_2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 06:15 PM   #13 (permalink)
2.5L Iron Duke
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 23
I'm not normally a fan of ford, but I think they may have something, especially if they use metal instead of all the plastic trim pieces that are so common now.
speedde423 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 06:21 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Either Mc Donalds or Computer
Posts: 327
any who one knows photoshop want to put OJ in the new bronco And post it for "heretage" reflections?
:roflmao:

This bronco Is suppost to be on the supportive side of technology. Ranger Ain't Technology prone enough to be shared. Do it right or Dont Do it at all is what I say.
xellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2004, 07:44 PM   #15 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
desmo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,720
Quote:
Originally posted by zhat@Jan 20 2004, 06:40 PM
As a hard core Early Bronco enthusiast, I was excited to hear that Ford is doing something with the Bronco nameplate, but I'm dismayed to now hear that it might be a unibodied smaller than Escape sized vehicle.  The original Bronco was made to be a serious off road vehicle to compete with Jeep.  The new vehicle needs to do the same thing.  It needs to be simple, rugged, on frame, and easy to modify.  A vehicle with a solid front axle would be great.  It needs to be a vehicle that can kick the crap out of the Jeep Rubicon.  It hurts to read this new news...
The proportions of the concept are alot like the original Bronco's. And I understand Nick Scheele wants to do it on a frame. Unfortunately, they will never be able to certify the steel dash. But the thing will be a huge hit if they keep it in the spirit of the concept. We need an alternative to the Wrangler and $35K Hummer H3s.
desmo9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > The Competition



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.