![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,170
|
DETROIT U.S. automakers would have us believe that 2004 is the Year of the Car. But here in the hometown of the domestic auto industry, it really is shaping up as the Rebirth of the Family Sedan.
The battle for Car of the Year honors is being waged most fiercely between two crosstown contenders, the 2005 Chrysler 300 and the 2005 Ford Five Hundred all-new flagship sedans for their respective brands that resurrect popular number nameplates from the 60s on modern hardware thats as good as anything Detroit has ever built. If the big Chrysler four-door reeks of sass and presence and muscle, the new Ford is all about finesse, refinement and sophistication. The two rivals are priced within spitting distance of each other the 300 starts at $23,920, the Five Hundred at $22,795, including destination. Both models seat five adults in comfort, and both are available with all-wheel drive. But the Ford Five Hundred, in nearly every other respect, couldnt be more different. Phil Martens, Fords group vice president for product creation, bills it as an affordable dream for middle America. Curiously, its roots lie across the Atlantic. Like Chrysler did with the 300, Ford tapped its European affiliate in this case, Swedish subsidiary Volvo for help in developing the new Five Hundred sedan and its sister vehicle, the 2005 Freestyle wagon. Volvo provided the basic architecture a corporate front-wheel-drive platform known internally as P2X as well as its expertise in all-wheel drive and safety. Full Article
__________________
-Your Type-R has never beaten JL W7 in any contest. -Your eD is not louder than a Stroker -You dont know what 160.0dB is like -You wont bully a multi-million dollar company via Internet -No one cares who You are, how many amp's You've installed, nor what "Your Buddy" can hit "in the kick". -You are a consumer. Shut the **** up and gobble up the products that You think are worth Your meager funds. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,407
|
Let's hope the 500 sells well. We need all american cars to sell good and have good quality if we want the big3 market share to rise.
__________________
"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a congress."- John Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,170
|
It sounds like it will be a worthy competitor to the Impala and 300. What turns me off about it is its size, atleast it's shorter than the huge Crown Vic. But.....alot of people will like its big size. I would rather get a Grand Prix or G6 over the 500. I'm not really impressed with the bland interior, what does everyone else think?
__________________
-Your Type-R has never beaten JL W7 in any contest. -Your eD is not louder than a Stroker -You dont know what 160.0dB is like -You wont bully a multi-million dollar company via Internet -No one cares who You are, how many amp's You've installed, nor what "Your Buddy" can hit "in the kick". -You are a consumer. Shut the **** up and gobble up the products that You think are worth Your meager funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 551
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Northeastern USA
Drives: 2007 Wrangler Unlimited X
Posts: 521
|
I can understand why someone would choose this car over the 300. It is a very clean, and modern design, with lots of room. It continues some of the Taurus' more succesful design themes, while incorporating a lot influence from VW/Audi, so it looks both upscale and familiar. I would like to see the carbon fiber interior, because the (fake?) wood trim seems a little too old school for me. The 200 HP V6 is inexcusable, however. In this age of HEMIs, and turbocharged Subarus, where the Camry/Accord/Altima trio all break the 240 HP mark, two-hundred horsepower seems and sounds weak.
Overall, this is a great effort from Volvo.....er, Ford! Ford seems to have a good strategy, in letting its affiliates take the lead in developing the passenger car platforms, while the Detroit group focuses on trucks, and truck-based SUVs. Other than the Crown Vic, and Grand Marquis, all of Ford's passenger cars are (or soon will be) based on a Volvo or Mazda platform. The new Mustang even has foreign roots, being based on a variation of the Jaguar S-Type platform. With the press that Ford and Chrysler are getting, with these new models, I have to wonder how much stronger GM's product portfolio would be with even fewer divisions. It is easy for the press to focus on one or two new sedans, from a manufacturer. With GM, the public focus and media spotlight is diffused and diminished amongst its many brands. Between Pontiac, Buick, Chevrolet, and Saturn, GM has (or will have) no fewer than 8 mid/full-sized family sedans. All of these cars are competing for attention and advertising dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida (formerly Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic)
Posts: 1,642
|
This car isn't out yet, but I saw one this summer. In Jersey of all places cause it wouldn't be weird to see a preproduction model in Detroit or something. I didn't think much of it, I just thought it had been released already. Whatever.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 4,097
|
Quote:
__________________
07' SS Monte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2000 Chev Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 5,170
|
Gigastormer, I think Ford did a goood job with the interior of the 500. The power is unfortunately quite low. If it's supposed to replace the Crown Vic for now (Crown Vics are only commercial and fleet cars in Canada after 2000 I think) then it should at least have somewhat similar power. Give it 240hp like said in here or at least option to have that, and Ford would be in good shape with this car.
__________________
![]() 2000 Chevy Monte Carlo SS. Black, 3800 Series II V6, 4 speed automatic - 138,900km. The Official GMI 2007-2008 NHL Season |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newfoundland
Drives: 1998 Malibu, 3100V6 155hp 180tq. Dark Cherry Met.
Posts: 820
|
The way I see it, its a good car but nothing to brag about. Its better than the taurus but still not up to the 300 or the Impala. I say not up to the Impala because keep in mind that not long after this hits the market the Impala will go through a refreshing. It too will have a 200HP base engine but beat the Ford with its 260 and 290HP options. Also this car looks big and heavy and with a 112inch wheelbase it probably won't be able to handle as good as the Impala. As for the interior and other comfort things we'll just have to wait and see if GM has learned their lession yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,696
|
Regarding HP numbers, don't forget that the Duratec 35 will resolve that issue (although I don't think 200 is that bad, but relative to the competition it should have more available - remember that the current Taurus has the Vulcan 155 hp in most models, with the 200 hp in the top model). Not sure how much HP it will have but I have heard at least 260. Also, AWD is available, which is nice for those of us up here in the north. I like the quality appearance of this car. I think it is conservative, but classy and consistent. The exterior is a little boring for me, but I am not into the Camry, Accord, or Impala much either. I like the interior a lot, but I like conservative interiors. I hope the new Impala will have an impressive interior as well. I like the interior in the G6 and Cobalt a lot, so hopefully the Impala will have an interior that is also nice (current one is subpar in my opinion). By the way, has anyone else noticed the similarities between the taillights on the 4-dr Cobalt and G6? Not that it matters much anyway. I may be biased, but I want to see GM and Ford do well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,193
|
My only gripe about the Five Hundred is the lack of the Duratec 35. Once that motor is available, it will be a very potent car, especially with AWD. And once the SVT version is released, there will be a lot of heads turning. In N/A trim, that Duratec 35 can purportedly put out 280hp with the right tuning and still be very clean running. Now since SVT has a love affair with superchargers (and who doesn't, really?), I can just imagine them producing a 360-380hp version of that engine with a very nicely tuned suspension as a poor man's M3/CTS-V competitor.
Either way, it's really nice to see a renewed focus on passenger cars again. Honda and Toyota haven't really done much exciting in the market lately, because they've more or less owned the top spots. They're in for a surprise here shortly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Drives: 2001 Oldsmobile Silhouette
2003 Suzuki XL-7
2005
Posts: 5,050
|
I'm sure when the Duratec 35 becomes available this car will be even more appealing to those looking at imports. But with only 200HP, I wouldn't buy it. There are other American cars out there that seem to be of better value.
__________________
2007 BMW 328i. Black sapphire metallic. Terra leather. Poplar wood. Automatic trans. Xenon adaptive headlights. BMW Assist. Bluetooth. Premium package. Heated seats. iDrive navigation system. Rear sonar. Comfort access. LOGIC7 surround sound. Sirius. 18" BMW wheels. Rear spoiler. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara Luxury. Black onyx pearl. Beige leather. 4WD. Chrome hood vents, mirror covers, exhaust. Silver grille, taillight trim. Brushed metal bumper protector. Running boards. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5
|
It's a nice car, but it's something that Ford should've come out with in the mid to late 90's. I just hope this thing get favourable reliability ratings. Otherwhise, the Japanese and the import-lovers are just going to laugh at this.
On the other hand, I'm glad Ford is leaning towards one design identity. Just looking at the future Japanese offerings makes me think Japan is going through an identity crisis. It's like they can't shape a headlight to make it Toyota-esque. It either comes out haphazard or it mirrors some competitor. Ie) 3rd gen MR-2 = Porsche, 2005 RSX looking more like an Civic, 2005 RL looking like, um, I see a lil bit of old-style TL in there, some Cobalt in the rear, errr... |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|