![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Drives: 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora 3.5
Posts: 9,848
|
Chris Bangle, BMW Design. A British website (www.autoexpress.co.uk) is reporting that Chris Bangle will be exiting BMW. After a decade of working at the German company's Munich headquarters, where he completely altered BMW's design character (to a negative degree as some critics insist, including us), the website reports that Bangle will leave after the global launch of the 1-series next fall, "before declaring that his daring brand rethink is complete and that the time has come for a new design boss to take over." As we've said many times before, transforming a brand's design character is one of the toughest tasks any automobile designer can face - especially when it involves such an iconic brand as BMW. If this report is true, we have no doubt that Bangle will end up in another top design job somewhere, but his legacy at BMW will be a mediocre one, at best, as far as we're concerned. Bangle didn't so much as revamp the brand's design character, as rip its guts out and hurl it into uncharted, and in some cases, unwelcome territory. Not that revamping a brand design's character shouldn't involve a measure of discomfort and some visually challenging design language, because it should if you believe in continuing to develop a look that will live and breathe in the future. But what Bangle managed to accomplish in one fell swoop was to degrade the integrity of the overall look and feel of BMW and diminish its all-important "presence" on the road - which is no small feat. He brought attention to BMW with his work, but much of it was unwanted attention, which inevitably forced BMW executives to constantly explain, justify and defend the look of their vehicles, instead of talking about the inherent goodness of them. In short, Bangle turned BMW executives into a bunch of apologists for the brand - something that did not sit well with anyone in Munich. Oh, they went out of their way to defend the look of the cars and to defend Bangle himself - dismissing the negative comments as insignificant and being generated by people who "just didn't get it" (the classic designer putdown to "outsiders") - and by implying that what BMW was doing was clearly over the heads of most people, which made things even worse. But the writing has been on the wall for months, with the declining sales of the new 7 Series clear proof that the revamp of BMW's flagship (along with BMW's death-wish fascination with electronic overkill) was a complete disaster. We also keep hearing reports of the factory helping some BMW dealers around the country to "buy back" the 7 Series from disgusted owners, and we wonder how much longer BMW can conceal this from the ever-vigilant automotive media constantly looking for a scoop. The final design tweak that Bangle did, which offended BMW purists to no end, was that he did away with the driver-angled instrument panel center stack - something as much a part of the "look" of BMW as the twin nostril front grill itself. As we mentioned in the item above, BMW has lost its way by losing touch with what made the brand appealing and special to begin with - and Chris Bangle has undeniably contributed immeasurably to its decline.
Source: Autoextremist ----- I guess Rex's C&D cover is partially right then, now if only the rest would change...
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: @ home in my room
Posts: 1,937
|
Let a mad man run amok and look @ what happens.....I hope Honda or Toyota picks him up.
__________________
Current line up: 1987 Buick Regal S/W 1987 Pontiac Trans AM 1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula 1998 Ford Windstar 1998 Subaru Impreza Wagon 1998 Chevy Camaro Z-28 2004 Chevorlet Trailblazer And further down the road: 2k4 Cadillac CTS V. Those gone but not forgotten: 1991 Ford Taurus 1993 Chevy Lumina --ME-- |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portland OR/ Ketchikan AK
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: @ home in my room
Posts: 1,937
|
Quote:
I didn't wish anything on anyone...so what R U talking about?? ![]()
__________________
Current line up: 1987 Buick Regal S/W 1987 Pontiac Trans AM 1991 Pontiac Firebird Formula 1998 Ford Windstar 1998 Subaru Impreza Wagon 1998 Chevy Camaro Z-28 2004 Chevorlet Trailblazer And further down the road: 2k4 Cadillac CTS V. Those gone but not forgotten: 1991 Ford Taurus 1993 Chevy Lumina --ME-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Walking
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4
|
I'm glad they booted him. I like the Z4, and the new 5, but the 7 got destroyed. I hope the 1 and new 3 coming soon aren't as bad. I'm assuming not, since BMW is getting rid of him. He might be good at another company, but you don't let that design loose on something like the BMW marque
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sykesville, Md
Posts: 211
|
Hey dude, at least source your stuff if your gonna copy an paste... http://www.autoextremist.com/page6.shtml#table
It's actually a really good site. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
GMI Mod/Camaro Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,506
|
wait... bangle was a bad designer? I thought he was good? All the BMW's now look great. I dont see what he big deal is? I love the new 7, and the 5 is alright...the headlights look a little funky.
__________________
![]() Any Inside Info? Questions or Coments? Ideas? Email me at BigAl@GMInsidenews.com 1993 Caprice 9C1 1987 Camaro Z28 1972 Camaro RS |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Drives: 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora 3.5
Posts: 9,848
|
I guess I was so happy to hear that Bangle was let go, I fogot to site it. (It was also kind of funny that Rex predicted it). Either way, autoextremist has usually been an import leaning, DOHC crazy site. They are usually very anti-gm, although recently that have had some good stuff. Either way, no biggie...
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 44
|
-Not to get off the topic: No, autoextremist.com is not anti GM, it is usually right. Peter DeLorenzo spent decades working for The General and knows us inside and out... he has been around the block (personally knew Billy Mitchell and many others). A highly recommended Wednesday morning read for anyone interested in the industry. Now, note to Bangle; DO NOT send your resume to The General- the 7-series has a hideous Lego rear end that found it's way to the 5-series in the name of intruiging "flamed" surfaces. Last time i checked, it was hard to make "flamed" surfaces from Lego's. Note to BMW: keep up the good work, Cadillac is looking better by the minute.
__________________
1970 Plymouth AAR Cuda. 4 speed. Plum Crazy. 2004 Saab 9-3 Arc. 5 speed. Black. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 317
|
i liked bangle's cars. i think the 7 is beautiful, the 5 is decent but the back is a little off. the 6 series is very nice, and with the 4 series i think they perfected the design. the upcoming 3 series is sure to be a hit. it's unfortunate they fired him just as the design was truly coming together. and yes, bmw's do look better than any gm car you can currently buy...except maybe the CTS-V, very nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 37
|
That guy is such a clown. I wish he stayed longer so he can destroy BMW. Oh well I guess the engineers will do that job since they have managed to get rid of any road feel. The 7 is alright, but the more I look at it it makes me laugh, I never was a big fan of any 7 anyways, they are an old man's ride. The 5 actually looks nice on the pictures they have on their website, they are usually black to hide the ugliness. I saw one two days ago and man that thing is horrible. I thought it was Bangle's best work, but after I saw it in person I smiled and said "BMW is screwed". The 6 is just plain boring, it might be fast or whatever (I'll take a C6 anyday over this) but the car is so plain it looks like a cross of a sebring and grand prix. The photochops of the 4 & 3 are getting high regard by people and I don't see it, they look boring just like the 6. Remember if they look boring in a photochop that a bimmer fan wants, you know they are desperate, because the actual car will probably look pretty lame. I know some "true" fans of 3 series that are already switching to A4s. Sad days for BMW & their fans to come, happy days for the rest of us. Now let's see how VW manages to screw Audi some more by placing cars like the Phateon over their flagship A8. Next will be their roadster that will destroy the TT. Why?? Nobody can stay on top of their game that long, ask Joe Montana, Michael Jordan, Wayne Gretzky, heck even ask GM. Thank god GM is a big company and will probably make a comeback since even on their bad years they were still selling tons of cars. If a smaller company like BMW fails, it might be the end. Goodbye BMW and have fun rebuilding your company, if you can...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 24,248
|
:lol:
I actually like the new look of BMW. it is extrememly difficult to rebrand an entire lineup and create a new identity. Not many people have the vision and the skills to do that and do it successfully. I simply don't understand the problem with BMW. The designs are fresh and exciting. Yes, there is techno overkill inside, with absolutely no ease of use. But that's really not BMW's fault. It is Microsoft for creating the unuseable interface and design. I find the 7 very elegant yet muscular, same with the 5's. Even Cadillac has had naysayers when it comes to ARt & Science!! Even from day 1 with Evoq. Not everyone is into sculpted modern interiors with all the angles and such. Besides, I think the worst design was Ford's "next-gen Taurus," in which the designer said, "let's create a car based on an oval!" Geeeeeez. <_<
__________________
![]() 2000 Saab 9-5 Aero 1995 Mercedes C280 1994 Jaguar XJ6 ...when all hope is gone, you know sad songs say so much...My Vision of Cadillac My Vision of Cadillac (REDUX) ![]()
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|