![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Lonesome Crowded West
Drives: 04 GMC Sierra
06 Dodge Magnum
Posts: 1,508
|
Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
Federal cases claimed engines in 1999-2002 pickups, SUVs had loud noise, or 'piston slap.'
By Ed Garsten / The Detroit News A federal judge in Oklahoma City has granted General Motors Corp.'s motions to dismiss 10 counts in federal suits filed on behalf of hundreds of pickup and SUV owners who claim their vehicles have defective engines. The suits, filed a year ago, have yet to be classified as a class action. Federal Judge Joseph Heaton is expected to decide in the next 30 days whether to grant class action status to the suits. The plaintiffs say the engines in about 800,000 1999-2002 pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles are plagued by a loud knocking noise known as "piston slap." The noise is caused when the pistons knock against the side of the engine cylinder because the clearance between the piston and cylinder is too wide, according to the complaint in one of many cases filed against GM since October 2003. Last spring, an Oklahoma state judge denied class action status to separate suits filed in state court, but later reversed his ruling and granted the suits national class action status. GM is appealing the Oklahoma state judge's ruling granting class action status to the state lawsuits. Attorney J.D. Peters of the Detroit law firm Charfoos & Christensen is handling the federal cases for the plaintiffs. He said the dismissals are not a setback. "We view it as very positive, because most of our causes of action, which are primarily express or implied warranties, are allowed to proceed in the case," Peters said. Heaton dismissed the counts on Monday because he felt they were redundant, unclear or weak, Peters said. The federal case involves seven V-8 engines installed in many pickup trucks and SUVs between 1999 and 2002 with displacements ranging from 3.1 liters to 8.1 liters. But some owners of later model vehicles with 8.0 liter V-8 engines have also complained of the noise. "My 2004 8.1L is knocking with less than 2K miles," one owner wrote on the Internet site www.pistonslap.com, which is dedicated to the case and was started by one of the plaintiffs. The state suit includes engines installed in 1999-2002 pickups and SUVs, Peters said. GM has called the problem a "tick" -- saying it disappears after a few seconds after the engine warms up. But some owners say while the sound does subside quickly, it never disappears. Aside from the noise, owners complain the vehicles use an excessive amount of fuel, and that resale value is adversely affected. Continued... http://www.detnews.com/2005/autosins...C01-276094.htm |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 348
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
Just another way for attorneys to try and make money off of frivolous law suits. So the engine clatters for the first 5 seconds after start. We have 3 2001 Silverados with more than 287k each and my personal Avalanche with 100k and the "piston slap" has never caused a problem. You know how the old joke goes...What do you call a million lawyers on the bottom of the ocean? A good start!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
2.5L Iron Duke
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 99 Chevrolet Silverado Ext. 4x4
Posts: 21
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
This never would have happened if it had been an OHC or a Toyota
The funny thing is a few weeks ago I was sitting in the drivethru of In & Out, and heard a ton of valvetrain noise from the pickup behind me. What was it? A GM, a Ford....Nope, an 02 or 03 Tundra, making more noise than my 99 Silverado. "Oh What A Feeling!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
GMI Fixed Ops Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,940
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
Call me wrong, but my dealership HAS not witnessed any engine failure because of such! We have sold 2 5.3's to my knowledge, both were to HIGH mileage 1999's that belong to a nearby quarry.
I can also say that this doesn't seem to affect used units being sold at a steady rate off our lot. I think the longest a used GM truck will sit here is 45 days, and that is rare.
__________________
certified GM Dealer Parts Manager since 1994 GM Dealer Parts employee since 1987 AMC-Jeep-Renault Dealer Parts employee 1987-90 holder of many GM accredations, too numerous to list and not giving a damn! Last edited by GMCSonoma : 08-10-2005 at 12:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Lonesome Crowded West
Drives: 04 GMC Sierra
06 Dodge Magnum
Posts: 1,508
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,721
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
The ticking right after startup is not piston slap, it's lifter knock, there until the lifters pump up with oil. My '99 5.3 Silverado did it all the time. No biggie. Just more leaches wanting something for nothing in our lazy society.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 42
|
No that is piston slap, when GM changed the piston suppliers on the new gen III Vortec, thats what happened. It does go away tho, my 6 liter has it, and obviously GM has proven that it does not effect the performance or reliability of the engines in question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,009
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
I have it in my Tahoe - it only worries me due to my neighbor whose 3.1 v6 Lumina had a knock that turned out to be bearings...........
I presume its just the slap thing - it is annoying but goes away after a min or so.
__________________
------------ Goochman 2008 Buick Enclave CXL 2004 325Xi |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Manhattan
Drives: 96 Chevy Caprice LT1
72 Olds Cutlass Supreme
Posts: 2,333
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
A lot of people are getting angry at the people suing. And though some of you may have had good experiences with your own engines, others may not be so fortunate. There are plenty of examples in automotive history, recent and distant, where car makers have known about problems but did nothing. This may be one of those times. Or it may be people (lawyers and consumers) who don't know why their truck is making noise, but don't think it should (since they paid upwards of $30K for it). Or it may be people trying to get something for nothing. Those people rarely win, so that's not really a problem.
I just think it's odd that on a site where people complain so much about GM having had years of quality issues (in some cars and trucks) that we would all be so shocked that maybe there are problems.
__________________
Current .......................R.I.P. 1999 H-nda Elite 80...........1996 H-nda Elite 80 (stolen) 1996 Caprice LT1..............1986 Plymouth Colt Vista (died) 1995 H-nda Civic..............1978 Chevy Mailbu (sold) 1972 Cutlass Supreme Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mentor, Ohio
Posts: 111
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
My uncle is a mechanic for a general motors dealership and he said was the reason those engines made that piston slap was because gm basically got rid of the skirts on the pistons to make them lighter and for better gas mileage. He said that slap doesnt affect the engine at all. No harm done. Once all the metals warm up and expand you wont hear anything. But since its not even a harm gm got sick of hearing the complaints so they updated the motors so you dont hear that anymore. Never bothered me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Yucaipa, CA
Posts: 332
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
I like to think of the piston slap noise as the drum roll leading to the peak of GM Powertrain TORQUE!
You can read a million threads on the paranoia surrounding piston slap on enthusiast boards like http://www.fullsizechevy.com "Will piston slap cause my Silverado with 350,000 miles on it to fail prematurely??" ![]()
__________________
Currently in the driveway: 2005 Pontiac GTO Supercharged 487RWHP/490RWTQ 2005 GMC Canyon Z85 Crewcab 2002 Saturn SL2 2000 Saturn SL2 1969 Chevrolet Camaro 350 1968 Firebird 400 Coupe Non-GM 2004 BMW Z4 3.0i 2002 BMW 325Ci convertible |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 11,271
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
wow i never heard of any of this before. But by how it sounds piston sound does sound common.
__________________
I'll make a new sig. Later. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 110
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
In my opinion these people may have a valid argument if the engines were actually failing after say 50,000 miles or something, but these engines are still running after more than 100,00 miles or much higher. This is just a noise, not a defect. And I suppose that after you buy a car and a few months later you decide you don't like the wind noise that you should be able to return it.... I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,009
|
Re: Court dismisses "piston slap" suits
Monkeylizard - do you own one of these engines? Wind noise it is not, trust me. It can be a rather loud knocking/pinging sound akin to a motor with trouble.
__________________
------------ Goochman 2008 Buick Enclave CXL 2004 325Xi |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|