GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Commentaries
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2008, 10:17 PM   #1 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
Premium Member
 
ChevyRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Drives: 2007 BMW 335xi, 2007 Saturn Aura XR
Posts: 3,645
What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks
www.gminsidenews.com
October 13, 2008
By: ChevyRules


The Suburban is one of GM's longest running moniker, how will it survive through the changing market?

It is no secret that GM is under increased pressure from the market's shrinking demand for Body on Frame SUV's and trucks and the stringent CAFE regulations. These two big factors are forcing GM into taking drastic measures from killing of rear-wheel drive vehicles to layoffs and plant closures.

Today we also learned rumors of GM's plans for the next generation of full size SUV's and trucks. Some of these decisions I support where others I oppose. We know the Silverado and Sierra are safe so they will not be mentioned.

Let's start at the Escalade. The criticisms of the current Escalade are that it is foremost a body on frame based SUV riding on the GMT-900 platform. It also strongly resembles its siblings the Tahoe, Suburban and Avalanche. Taking it to an updated version of the Lambda platform is a smart idea. The platform is unibody based and will be able to provide a more luxurious ride especially if they equip it with GM's magnetic ride control. There is already a SUT version of the Lambda's planned, so the EXT trim is relatively safe. The ESV's fate will probably be on the fence depending upon GM's decision on what to do with the Suburban as I do not see GM spending the limited money they have to extend Lambda just for the Escalade.

There are three problems though with this move. One is that Lambda is a front-wheel drive platform. Though that could be solved if the rumors turn out to be true and Lambda can be tuned to be a RWD vehicle. The other issue is the design of the new Escalade. Although the reports say the Escalade will not look like anything like the other Lambda's, they said the same for the Traverse and I can clearly see the family resemblances between the three other Lambda's. So GM may not be telling the truth to the full extent. The last issue and maybe a small issue depending on where the Escalade's competitors stand with fuel economy regulations ramming down their throats as well is there is no available V8 for a Lambda Escalade. As reported a few months back; the Ultra V8, which would have eventually found itself in the Lambda's has been shelved (again). Whether a FWD Small Block V8 much like the LS4 is developed for it has yet to be seen.

The Avalanche is a mystery seeing as how GM has a Ridgeline competitor for Chevy in the works on the Lambda platform. If the Ridgeline competitor is uniquely designed and does not resemble the Traverse, the Avalanche should be its nameplate. The Avalanche moniker is a well established name and if pitted against the Ridgeline has the potential of easily outselling the Ridgeline. If the Ridgeline competitor resembles the Traverse, the Avalanche should die. There is no need for two vehicles that serves a similar purpose. The Tahoe/Yukon has also faced their maker. The Traverse and Acadia will both fill their places easily.

Last, but not least is the Suburban/Yukon XL. GM is considering moving these two vehicles along with the Escalade ESV to an extended Lambda platform. If GM was smart they would keep the Suburban/Yukon XL on the C3XX platform. There are still plenty of people in need for a BOF full size SUV including my family. They need a V8 powered vehicle to tow their trailers, boats, etc and the ability to carry 7 people and all of their cargo at the same time. Moving the Suburban over to the Lambda will alienate the consumers in need for such a vehicle. The Silverado while a capable tower, will not be able to carry 7 people and the Traverse while a capable people mover, will not be able to tow heavy equipment. If GM does go through with this move, they will force my family to go to Ford or Toyota for their next full size SUV to replace our GMT-800 Suburban.

Ignoring GM's whoring of the Lambda platform in these circumstances, the choices GM has to make concerning their full size SUV's is a life or death decision.
__________________


Follow me on Twitter
ChevyRules is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-13-2008, 10:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2009 Acura TSX
Posts: 2,879
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

It may be a good move to keep the Suburban/Yukon XL/Escalade ESV as BOF trucks, as the Ford Flex is having dismal sales.
kenman923 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:26 PM   #3 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
motorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,134
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

the federal govt will always need black suburbans
__________________
chevy owner since 1953,30 new chevys and 11 new corvettes since 1959 ,# 11 2008 corvette in the garage ,2004 impala,1988 2500 silverado,former NASCAR tech inspector,retired race engine builder
motorman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:28 PM   #4 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
member12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Drives: 2007 Silverado 4x4
Posts: 7,663
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

The whole full sized truck line should remain untouched.

Adjust production to focus more and more on the lambdas....but there will always be a need for real SUVs.

The Escalade could probably go lambda.
__________________
Get your geek on in 2012!
member12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 9,291
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

I can live with Escalade on Lambda, so long as it's not a Traverse with a Cadillac badge slapped on. Completely fresh design, no design elements from the other Lambdas, and I'd be fine with it.

The other GMT-900s would best stay on C3XX. There's obviously still a market for them as people are still buying them. Sure, sales aren't as high as they used to be, but people will always need vehicles like this.

So in short, I agree with ChevyRules's commentary. Nice work.

By the way, congrats on the new title at GMI!
__________________


Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM.
Current Cars:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4
2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6
1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6
Former Cars:
1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles)
1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles)
Future Car:
2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6
FenwickHockey65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
osv_alero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dundee, Oregon
Drives: 2004 Tahoe LT (Bob), 2005 Malibu Maxx LT (Harold t
Posts: 1,034
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorman View Post
the federal govt will always need black suburbans
Exactly!
__________________
The U.S. trade deficit with China increases by $1 billion a day
The U.S. trade deficit for automobiles alone is $11 billion per month


http://americaneconomicalert.org/


For every one transplant job added in the US, nearly five jobs are eliminated
osv_alero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:32 PM   #7 (permalink)
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 45
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

What happened to the awesome new diesel that was supposed to get 30mpg in the silverado???
That with affordable bio-diesel would sell and not hurt cafe ####.
We read about this engine over a year ago...nothing else lately...
boynton6spd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
jmlee0695's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baton Rouge,la
Drives: 08' Silverado 5.3;08' CTS 3.6 DI, 08' Saturn Vue X
Posts: 2,430
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

IF GM can get Lambda II to be able to tow up to 7,000-8,000 lbs, i wouldnt mind the tahoe and suburban moving to it. it could be called Lambda II HD so the traverse,acadia,enclave,outlook dont have to have the extra weight. then let the sububan 2500 hd go to C3XX
jmlee0695 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
chevydlrmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Central Region, WOL
Drives: 2006 CK15753 LQ9
Posts: 1,074
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

The Traverse and Acadia can not replace Tahoe and Yukon. The current Tahoe/Yukon owners don't want to go to a lower sitting vehicle with the V8 kick. I love the Traverse and Enclave, but they are not trucks. I don't think it is time to shelf them. It can't be that hard or expensive to have two wheelbases.
chevydlrmn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Kamshaaft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Somewhere in the deserts of Australia.
Drives: 2006 Holden Commodore 3.6L V6
Posts: 306
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

Offer 2 full sized truck/SUVs - a heavy duty work model to compete with the likes of F-250s, and an offroad capable 4WD (RWD at the flick of a switch for picking the kids up) SUV. Then replace everything else with G8 ST*, Sportwagon, and the CTS wagon (even though my lack of faith in that thing is large).

*Not everyone is a fan, so throw in something along the lines of the old Holden One Tonner (not the Rodeo) with leafs and the rest as another variant.

Some of you guys need trucks, plain and simple, and there are a lot of people there that really don't need trucks like they think they do. That is, offer a limited range, which is suitable for all intents and purposes. You can be comprehensive without being comprehensive.

It's not a paradox, it's enlightenment.
Kamshaaft is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:12 PM   #11 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 9,291
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

Oh, and someone brought up a good point on another thread.

Diesels. Now.
__________________


Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM.
Current Cars:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4
2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6
1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6
Former Cars:
1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles)
1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles)
Future Car:
2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6
FenwickHockey65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:13 PM   #12 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: mn
Posts: 120
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

They need to keep every single truck they have. I realize that they don't want to produce a lot of them, and CAFE doesn't help. But if Chrysler can get a diesel that'll get 25 mpg in the Ram then GM should be able to do the same. Plus the Hybrid V8 system that GM/Chrysler made should help with CAFE as well.

The reason they need to keep their expertise up in trucks is that trucks are the last bastion for the US automakers. No other auto manufacturer can make trucks as well as the US can. We are still light years ahead of the asians and europeans in that department. Hell the new Ram has an interior that rivals lexus. If we let our truck expertise wither we give the foreigners a chance to catch up and then when the market wants/needs trucks again we won't have that advantage anymore.
__________________
Currently driving an 09 Pontiac G8

V6

Functional Hood Vents, shorty antenna (for now)

EV Weblog - a blog about the new chevy volt and other EVs

squat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:32 PM   #13 (permalink)
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 821
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorman View Post
the federal govt will always need black suburbans

Oh come on, getting your door kicked in at 3 am by a bunch of guys in black Toyota Priuses, Prii, or whatever you would call more than one of them, would be just as intimidating.
__________________
Most of the fools on this site are all about screw the UAW, Rick Wagoner, ETC. How many of you could actually run a large company, probably none, instead you sit in internet forums mouthing off about everything. A good part of you are probably sitting around on your companies time doing this crap, yet you are pissed off somebody makes more than you do. Dont be suprised when your employer finds out you have this much free time and eliminates your job.
mike's 01ws6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 9,291
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike's 01ws6 View Post
Oh come on, getting your door kicked in at 3 am by a bunch of guys in black Toyota Priuses, Prii, or whatever you would call more than one of them, would be just as intimidating.
Ehh...about as intimidating as a baby rabbit wielding a big scary cotton ball.
__________________


Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM.
Current Cars:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4
2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6
1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6
Former Cars:
1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles)
1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles)
Future Car:
2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6
FenwickHockey65 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 12:06 AM   #15 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS3 V8
 
stevecmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Muskego, WI
Drives: 04' Grand Prix GT 08' Pierce Impel Ladder Truck
Posts: 3,865
Re: What GM Should do With Their Full Size SUV's and trucks

Quote:
Originally Posted by motorman View Post
the federal govt will always need black suburbans
thats what i said ealier..

And my fire departments and many others will to.

my family have Suburbans for 23 years.. they are great.. GM dont get rid of them
stevecmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Commentaries



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.