GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Commentaries
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2006, 02:18 PM   #76 (permalink)
Administrator
 
nsap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP 2009 Ford Focus SEL
Posts: 14,965
Re: GM's Product To-Do List

Quote:
Originally Posted by bmlvu97
Another item to add to the list...

2 Doors!!!

I am sick and tired of everything being 4 doors in the whole GM lineup. Think about it...Chevy has the Monte Carlo, Cobalt, and Corvette, Pontiac has the G6 and Solstice, Saturn has the Ion & Sky, Buick - Nothing, and Cadillac only has the XLR (I am probably missing something, but anyways...). In a couple of years we can add the Camaro (God willing) but beyond that - there isnt anything. There is a decent segment of people who do not want a sedan and do not want a truck or SUV.

Maybe you build a 2-door similar in size to the LaCrosse and give it to Buick.

Brian
Cadillac is adding a CTS Coupe. Pontiac will have the new GTO.
__________________

E-Mail Me

Engine Guide Updated!! -- Revised layout, more info., up-to-date
nsap is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-18-2006, 10:50 PM   #77 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
New_Mexico_Sunset_on_Rt66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA (formerly sunny New Mexico (y muchacho lo falto))
Drives: '02 Corvette Z06, '01 Silverado LT 4x4 Ext Cab, 19
Posts: 5,667
Re: GM's Product To-Do List

Oddly, I find myself agreeing. Mainly on the quality and design 'tips.

As far as the keys. I don't see a big issue. There are more important things to conquer first.

On the quality 'tip. According to JD Power, Buick and Cadillac rank above Toyota. The "perceptions" have not caught up with the reality, however. But, true, until Pontiac and Chevrolet can be held to the Toyota-level, or above, several consumers will not consider Chevrolet or Pontiac.

And, True. Several accomplishment can be cited. The quality gains are one. Another would be the new committment to design. Which I for one, genuinely welcome.

Several recent accomplishments I would cite are the G6, Solstice, Sky, Lucerne, Corvette, SSR, HHR, Equinox, Enclave, Tahoe, Yukon, Impala. I'm sure I'm missing a few.

On the design 'tip. A few well-paced "heritage" inspired products, I would welcome. Actually "heritage" design, I feel could be found on all of the products. Hear me out before you judge. I don't mean to "copy" a vehicle from the past outright like what Ford did with the Mustang. But a couple products could be "copied". The Camaro concept is a prime example. I think it was well done (except for that too-pointy nose. I was hoping for something more tamed and '69-ish. Although, I've already thought of budgeting in a car payment for one). I've heard the NG Impala will use the '66 Impala for inspiration. I'm hoping that will look cool.



I guess what I really mean, are fender line from the 1930's say. Or a roofline from the Nomad concept. A rear line like a '51 Buick say. The tailights from a '51 Buick say.



All of these photos and design stamps need to be floating around GM someplace. I would hope the old drawings were not destroyed. I understand that today's manufacturing techniques do not lend themselves to grabbing a drawing from 1949 or 1951, and running to the shop floor to make it. But the designers at GM should be able to take inspiration from these photos and drawings. I don't mean to copy 'em, more to take inspiration from. As I said, a fender swoop here, a roofline there.

Me personally? I would love to see something reminiscent of the 1958 Impala. I think this car is gourgeous.







I really like that rear talight configuration of the '58 Impala. (Hey Toad, don't give me no grief). Anyone who has seen 'Amercan Graffiti' will understand that.

I don't think the GM designers need to "reinvent the wheel". I think their answers are right under their noses (literally). Hiddent away in a musky vault somewhere. I would hope that somebody scanned in those drawings, and the designs for those products from the 1930's, 1940's and 1950's were not destroyed.

I think those designers would feel quite flattered that their drafting pencil strokes from 50-60 years ago were being air-brushed and revived today. Use those drafting pencil strokes from 50, 60 or even 70 years ago. Those designers would be flattered.
__________________
1979 Chevy Van
1978 Pontiac Firebird
1985 GMC S-15 Jimmy
1992 Pontiac Grand Am
1998 Oldmobile Intrigue
2002 Chevrolet Camaro Z-28
1972 Chevrolet C-10 P/U
1979 Chevrolet K5 Blazer
2002 Chevrolet Corvette Z06
2001 Chevrolet Silverado LT 4x4 Ext Cab

"Sometimes you gotta say, 'What the *********'. "What the ********* gives you freedom, freedom creates opportunity, ... opportunity - makes your future." - 'Risky Business' 1983

Last edited by New_Mexico_Sunset_on_Rt66 : 06-18-2006 at 10:56 PM.
New_Mexico_Sunset_on_Rt66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 07:31 AM   #78 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Drives: 2006 Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 583
Re: GM's Product To-Do List

I would say in this context every one has their opinion,so beauty is in the eye of the beholder.This is like a good woman, the cost is high on the really good ones.(and how many are still looking for this perfect one) I would challenge you all to put your perfect car, or as close as you can. This would be nice to see, what in your mind is the best in production today. Then take a good look at what you are asking for. The experience I have had working in GM ,in Detroit . you are all wet,wet dreaming and juvenile if you think GM is like Mum and dad to give you ,what you want in this life time.( stamp your feet ,spit on the floor but do grow up a little faster than you have) I know most of you have grown up given what you wanted but it was not right.

Last edited by 303montecarlo : 06-21-2006 at 07:37 AM. Reason: spelling correction
303montecarlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Commentaries



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.