GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Commentaries
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2007, 02:51 PM   #31 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Toto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Drives: Opel Astra X16XEL
Posts: 1,138
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb02
Gm has way too many division, Chevy should be the entry level division, then comes saturn, then Caddy, get rid of buick gmc, pontiac, saab, opal, vuxhaul, and all the rest and use only Chevy, Saturn and Caddy as world wide products.
In Europe ... good luck.
Toto is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-23-2007, 03:02 PM   #32 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
camaro_freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
GM does have a VERY green line up, with a lot of vehicles that achieve over 30mpg, but the burned in image still lingers.
while I like where you are going with your article I must say that a lot GM vehicles can only obtain those 30MPG at highway speeds... not inner city or daily driving.

That is where GM needs to improve most.
__________________
John Crichton: It's beer o'clock. Where's my riot?

camaro_freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 03:27 PM   #33 (permalink)
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas 75230
Posts: 62
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by N8s07ss
I think the Cobalt's fuel economy is vastly underrated. I own a Cobalt SS supercharged, and consistently get 25-27 MPG city, and 32-34 MPG highway. I guess it's possible that it's because my engine is .2L smaller than the base models, but I would think that the base engine 2.2L would do better than my LSJ. I visit Cobaltss.net occasionally, and I remember a thread a while back about fuel economy, and many of the other members were seeing similar numbers to me, and I remember a few of the 2.2 owners getting something in the 40 MPG-range highway. Are those numbers any more competitive, or do I just not know enough about the Civic & Corolla numbers?

I agree with you. I have an 05 stripper Cobalt with a 5 speed that got me 37 MPG on my trip to Virginia over the 4th of July. The harder you drive it the worse it gets. I was going 74 the whole time and it wandered between 35mpg - 39mpg. But it was never below 35.
__________________
99 Ext Cab Z71
02 Yukon Denali
67 GTO
pinch a loaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 05:14 PM   #34 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
tama z71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Drives: 1969 Chevy El Camino 2004 GMC Canyon
Posts: 1,506
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

I can't agree with this article. Fuel economy should be a common thread amongst all GM brands. Also, anyone who has ever followed a 3-cylinder GEO down the turnpike at 51 mph with no way around them (as I did for 15 minutes today) will likely not look kindly to the rebirth of the GEO brand. As others have said and Al pointed out, another brand just is not in the GM cards.
tama z71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 05:24 PM   #35 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
unkillsam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Drives: 2008 Victory Red HHR LT
Posts: 2,441
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwrebholz
The last thing GM needs is another divsion, even a subdivision.

What GM NEEDS is a compact and subcompact that can compete with the Civic, Corolla, Fit and Yaris. The Cobalt and Aveo aren't there. They aren't even CLOSE. The Cobalt needs to lose about 400 pounds and go with a sub-2.0L ECOTEC that can get it up to 30 MPG city. The Aveo needs a 40+ MPG powertrain.

And they can't be "just as good" as the competition. They need to be better--leaps and bounds better--before anyone will take them seriously.
Are you even remotely knowledgeable about cars? The Cobalt only weighs about 150 more pounds then a Civic. How is it supposed to loose 400 lbs.
unkillsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 05:50 PM   #36 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
GM-Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Drives: 2007 Pontiac Grand Prix 1997 Saab 900 2.0 Turbo
Posts: 1,420
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Not a bad idea. I like the Saturn route too, they need to distance their existance with GM because the people that would consider Saturn would not consider anything domestic; they are too good for that.
__________________
Current:
2007 Pontiac Grand Prix
1997 Saab 900 2.0 Turbo(148,500 Sobbing Saab on blocks)
1987 Chevrolet Silverado 10 (retired 11/12/2007; 219,986 mi.)
Dead:
1983 Datsun 280 ZX by Nissan (146,857 mi.)
1986 Lincoln Mercury Lynx (64K mi.)
1979 Chrysler Cordoba w/ Corinthian Leather seats (130K mi.)
1976 Dodge Charger (130K mi.)
GM-Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 06:45 PM   #37 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
dallennium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin TX
Drives: Honda "CRAP" Accord EX V6 Coupe
Posts: 172
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Yes Geo does need to return it should have never left, obviously Toyota thought it was a good idea. I am sure it would be cost prohibitive for GM to build Gamma's in the USA, so to save face with the Union they could just import them to the Chevrolet/Geo dealers. Putting Geo at Saturn dealers is not a good idea it should be back at Chevrolet, GM has confused the buying public enough already.
__________________


More is enough

Last edited by dallennium : 07-23-2007 at 06:47 PM.
dallennium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 08:54 PM   #38 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
F14CRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 4,529
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Geo should never have been disbanded
__________________
'07 Subaru Forester: Manual trans, shifts assisted by Momo

'89 Buick Reatta: "Project GS"...3800 SII S/C, 6 speed manual...coming eventually

'94 Buick Century wagon: 3100 V6, business vehicle

Quote:
by MCGARRETT: It's not like Roger Smith and his croonies sat around on the 14th floor lighting cigars with $100 bills and ashing on babies saying " hey, lets loose a sh**load of market share and money, and lets make our big cars so small that no one will want one, ahahahahahahahaha !"
F14CRAZY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 09:03 PM   #39 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
PA Dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lords Valley, PA
Posts: 3,494
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

GM doesn't need another division. Just build 4 cylinder engines that get much better fuel economy, offer some more small cars, and just sell them in GM's current divisions. Making another division is just a waste of time, money, and resources and GM doesn't have much of either.
__________________
Optional: Possible but not necessary; left to personal choice.

MEANING YOU DON'T PAY FOR IT IF YOU DON'T WANT IT. SO GET OVER YOURSELF.


Learn the definition.
PA Dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 10:37 PM   #40 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra '02 Regal GS "05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,084
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
A Geo-Centric GM
by BigAls87Z28
www.gminsidenews.com

I know that at this point most people that have gotten this far are saying, "The last thing GM needs is another $@%# division!" but this is more or less an addition to the Saturn brand. This would be a great key to get people into the GM family. Young people getting into the Geo cars will return to the Saturn dealer to move up into car that had the same idea in mind, giving great gas mileage, only now their tastes have matured. Cars like the Aura and Outlook will grab attention of these family-conscious customers and move them up the line. Eventually the ties from Saturn to Caddy will be made, and hopefully the circle will be complete. Will it work like that every time? No, but GM can no longer afford to throw out random hybrid models that are disguised as just another vehicle made by the same old GM people. Toyota has thought about creating a Hybrid-Only division, and this is a great way for GM to jump out and grab the market now before Toyota does. It will show that GM is taking very large steps to set the record straight. Geo: The little green machine that helped save General Motors from itself.
This is a tough call, you are right on the money with the idea that GM needs to have a line that focuses on efficiency. This may sound odd, but since SAAB is an import brand to start with and has not really defined itself as to how it "fits" into GM; SAAB maybe the brand to do it with.

SAAB already has the BioPower drivetrains and is the leading brand in Europe of Alternative fuel vehicles this fits SAAB's European strategy.

Hybrids are more expensive than non Hybrid models and SAAB has some hybrids in the pipeline. The Triplets would give SAAB great entry vehicles and the new SAAB models will have the XWD system of AWD so SAAB's lineup would start with Scion competitors with the Triplets and Sonnet taken from the KAPPA or Alpha architeture and add Subaru competitors with models on the Delta II (WRX) and Epsilon II (Legacy and Outback) with Audi competitors with the new 9-5 on the Alpha platform with XWD (A4 and S4). The 9-4X and 9-6X would compete against the Tribeca and Q7. There could also be a A3 competitor from the Delta II with DSG gearbox and Turbo Diesels.

SAAB models are already fitted with Turbo Diesels, Bio Power, Bio Power Hybrid and XWD so there will be no additonal engineering costs to fit these powertrains.

GM needs to make more of SAAB's excellent safety record and with one division GM would compete with Scion, Subaru and Audi.

Last edited by SierraGS : 07-23-2007 at 10:43 PM.
SierraGS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 10:46 PM   #41 (permalink)
GMI Mod/Camaro Fanatic
 
BigAls87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,506
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

To move Saab downmarket like that would be tough as it has worked itself as a entry level luxury car for a while now.
The idea was to get hybird and fuel efficent cars into the hands of the common man. Most hybrids cost a decent amount of money, but a very effiecent 4cyl with a BAS system could increase local city milage and its high way stuff works itself out. This wouldnt be about building super fast rides, anything with any major power, but like Scion, they have 4cyl cars that get good gas milage, but its image is hip, its designs are edgy, and are growing in popularity.
As for Geo's name, I have never heard a real response, and most people probably know about someone's prizm that lasted 1/4 million miles. While it was a Corolla with badges on it, the name still has an image of quality and durability. Add design and cool to it, and you have a two-prongged attack at this new subcompact market with high tech hybrids and sharp design.
__________________

Any Inside Info? Questions or Coments? Ideas?
Email me at BigAl@GMInsidenews.com
1993 Caprice 9C1
1987 Camaro Z28
1972 Camaro RS
BigAls87Z28 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 10:51 PM   #42 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra '02 Regal GS "05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,084
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

The SAAB idea is mainly to avoid the cost of introducing a new brand and broaden SAAB's appeal. You are right about it being hard to stretch down market, but I think the Triplets may have enough going for them to not be considered "Econoboxes".

I think the GEO idea would work as it did originally in Chevy dealers, I am just afraid that GM will just drop it again if fuel prices drop.
SierraGS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 01:40 AM   #43 (permalink)
TKR
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Drives: 2000 Toyota Hilux Diesel
Posts: 695
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb02
Gm has way too many division, Chevy should be the entry level division, then comes saturn, then Caddy, get rid of buick gmc, pontiac, saab, opal, vuxhaul, and all the rest and use only Chevy, Saturn and Caddy as world wide products.
....and maybe they should use Opel, Chevrolet, Holden and Vauxhall but kill Saturn, GMC etc? Or kill the whole lot and rebrand them as Oldsmobile or something equally stupid?

Do you have any idea what backlash there would be in other markets if you killed off Holden, Opel or Vauxhall? Do you even care?

As for economy, GME seem to get pretty good economy but they somehow manage to make vehicles lighter than their NA counterparts and can therefore use smaller engines.

Last edited by TKR : 07-24-2007 at 01:43 AM.
TKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 02:24 AM   #44 (permalink)
Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
 
asim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 11,270
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

It's definitely a good idea to add another division that will focus on being green, and to sell it along with the new hip Saturn brand. I just don't know if naming it Geo is the best idea in the world, even though there is some brand recognition to the name. I have friends that make fun of the Geo brand, particularly the Geo Metro...so I don't know if the Geo name is exactly the right move. But it will definitely be smart to make a new, hip, eco-friendly brand within GM.
__________________
I'll make a new sig. Later.
asim is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 07:45 AM   #45 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
Flyingbunnys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairfax VA
Drives: Chevy S-10 1985
Posts: 335
Re: A Geo-Centric GM

I have to ask why why... First lets look at a compainy that is considered green and on top of the world right now, yes, you guessed it, Toyota. They have 3 brands we have Toyota, Scion, and Lexus. Which one is their green brand? None of them. Because its part of Toyota you only need 1 green car, the prius. then just offer a hybrid on the rest of your veicles and keep them mainstream breadand butter and affordable, ISN'T THAT WHAT CHEVY IS SUPPOST TO BE!!!! One thing I've been told is stick to something that works and toyota works, use the same plan as Toyota with Chevy(with exception to the corvette of course) Then pontiac obviously you performance but its failing as of now, buick the poor mans caddy(or for old poeple). Caddy of course for the rich. Saturn a younger version of Buick, a euro style twist. GMC should be the caddalac of trucks. See everything right now fits together perfectly no new barnds a Geo would be part of Chevy, end of story.
__________________
USA: 1985 2.8L Chevy S-10
Europe: 1987 Trabant 36 cu in Engine
-I must not walk to save a child, thats how it works-


Flyingbunnys is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > GMI Commentaries



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.