![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Drives: Opel Astra X16XEL
Posts: 1,138
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Quote:
That is where GM needs to improve most.
__________________
John Crichton: It's beer o'clock. Where's my riot?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas 75230
Posts: 62
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Quote:
I agree with you. I have an 05 stripper Cobalt with a 5 speed that got me 37 MPG on my trip to Virginia over the 4th of July. The harder you drive it the worse it gets. I was going 74 the whole time and it wandered between 35mpg - 39mpg. But it was never below 35.
__________________
99 Ext Cab Z71 02 Yukon Denali 67 GTO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Drives: 1969 Chevy El Camino
2004 GMC Canyon
Posts: 1,506
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
I can't agree with this article. Fuel economy should be a common thread amongst all GM brands. Also, anyone who has ever followed a 3-cylinder GEO down the turnpike at 51 mph with no way around them (as I did for 15 minutes today) will likely not look kindly to the rebirth of the GEO brand. As others have said and Al pointed out, another brand just is not in the GM cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Drives: 2008 Victory Red HHR LT
Posts: 2,441
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Drives: 2007 Pontiac Grand Prix
1997 Saab 900 2.0 Turbo
Posts: 1,420
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Not a bad idea. I like the Saturn route too, they need to distance their existance with GM because the people that would consider Saturn would not consider anything domestic; they are too good for that.
__________________
Current: 2007 Pontiac Grand Prix 1997 Saab 900 2.0 Turbo(148,500 Sobbing Saab on blocks) 1987 Chevrolet Silverado 10 (retired 11/12/2007; 219,986 mi.) Dead: 1983 Datsun 280 ZX by Nissan (146,857 mi.) 1986 Lincoln Mercury Lynx (64K mi.) 1979 Chrysler Cordoba w/ Corinthian Leather seats (130K mi.) 1976 Dodge Charger (130K mi.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin TX
Drives: Honda "CRAP" Accord EX V6 Coupe
Posts: 172
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Yes Geo does need to return it should have never left, obviously Toyota thought it was a good idea. I am sure it would be cost prohibitive for GM to build Gamma's in the USA, so to save face with the Union they could just import them to the Chevrolet/Geo dealers. Putting Geo at Saturn dealers is not a good idea it should be back at Chevrolet, GM has confused the buying public enough already.
__________________
More is enough
Last edited by dallennium : 07-23-2007 at 06:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 4,529
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Geo should never have been disbanded
__________________
'07 Subaru Forester: Manual trans, shifts assisted by Momo '89 Buick Reatta: "Project GS"...3800 SII S/C, 6 speed manual...coming eventually '94 Buick Century wagon: 3100 V6, business vehicle Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lords Valley, PA
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
GM doesn't need another division. Just build 4 cylinder engines that get much better fuel economy, offer some more small cars, and just sell them in GM's current divisions. Making another division is just a waste of time, money, and resources and GM doesn't have much of either.
__________________
Optional: Possible but not necessary; left to personal choice. MEANING YOU DON'T PAY FOR IT IF YOU DON'T WANT IT. SO GET OVER YOURSELF. Learn the definition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra
'02 Regal GS
"05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,084
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Quote:
SAAB already has the BioPower drivetrains and is the leading brand in Europe of Alternative fuel vehicles this fits SAAB's European strategy. Hybrids are more expensive than non Hybrid models and SAAB has some hybrids in the pipeline. The Triplets would give SAAB great entry vehicles and the new SAAB models will have the XWD system of AWD so SAAB's lineup would start with Scion competitors with the Triplets and Sonnet taken from the KAPPA or Alpha architeture and add Subaru competitors with models on the Delta II (WRX) and Epsilon II (Legacy and Outback) with Audi competitors with the new 9-5 on the Alpha platform with XWD (A4 and S4). The 9-4X and 9-6X would compete against the Tribeca and Q7. There could also be a A3 competitor from the Delta II with DSG gearbox and Turbo Diesels. SAAB models are already fitted with Turbo Diesels, Bio Power, Bio Power Hybrid and XWD so there will be no additonal engineering costs to fit these powertrains. GM needs to make more of SAAB's excellent safety record and with one division GM would compete with Scion, Subaru and Audi. Last edited by SierraGS : 07-23-2007 at 10:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
GMI Mod/Camaro Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,506
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
To move Saab downmarket like that would be tough as it has worked itself as a entry level luxury car for a while now.
The idea was to get hybird and fuel efficent cars into the hands of the common man. Most hybrids cost a decent amount of money, but a very effiecent 4cyl with a BAS system could increase local city milage and its high way stuff works itself out. This wouldnt be about building super fast rides, anything with any major power, but like Scion, they have 4cyl cars that get good gas milage, but its image is hip, its designs are edgy, and are growing in popularity. As for Geo's name, I have never heard a real response, and most people probably know about someone's prizm that lasted 1/4 million miles. While it was a Corolla with badges on it, the name still has an image of quality and durability. Add design and cool to it, and you have a two-prongged attack at this new subcompact market with high tech hybrids and sharp design.
__________________
![]() Any Inside Info? Questions or Coments? Ideas? Email me at BigAl@GMInsidenews.com 1993 Caprice 9C1 1987 Camaro Z28 1972 Camaro RS |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra
'02 Regal GS
"05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,084
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
The SAAB idea is mainly to avoid the cost of introducing a new brand and broaden SAAB's appeal. You are right about it being hard to stretch down market, but I think the Triplets may have enough going for them to not be considered "Econoboxes".
I think the GEO idea would work as it did originally in Chevy dealers, I am just afraid that GM will just drop it again if fuel prices drop. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Drives: 2000 Toyota Hilux Diesel
Posts: 695
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
Quote:
Do you have any idea what backlash there would be in other markets if you killed off Holden, Opel or Vauxhall? Do you even care? As for economy, GME seem to get pretty good economy but they somehow manage to make vehicles lighter than their NA counterparts and can therefore use smaller engines. Last edited by TKR : 07-24-2007 at 01:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 11,270
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
It's definitely a good idea to add another division that will focus on being green, and to sell it along with the new hip Saturn brand. I just don't know if naming it Geo is the best idea in the world, even though there is some brand recognition to the name. I have friends that make fun of the Geo brand, particularly the Geo Metro...so I don't know if the Geo name is exactly the right move. But it will definitely be smart to make a new, hip, eco-friendly brand within GM.
__________________
I'll make a new sig. Later. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairfax VA
Drives: Chevy S-10 1985
Posts: 335
|
Re: A Geo-Centric GM
I have to ask why why... First lets look at a compainy that is considered green and on top of the world right now, yes, you guessed it, Toyota. They have 3 brands we have Toyota, Scion, and Lexus. Which one is their green brand? None of them. Because its part of Toyota you only need 1 green car, the prius. then just offer a hybrid on the rest of your veicles and keep them mainstream breadand butter and affordable, ISN'T THAT WHAT CHEVY IS SUPPOST TO BE!!!! One thing I've been told is stick to something that works and toyota works, use the same plan as Toyota with Chevy(with exception to the corvette of course) Then pontiac obviously you performance but its failing as of now, buick the poor mans caddy(or for old poeple). Caddy of course for the rich. Saturn a younger version of Buick, a euro style twist. GMC should be the caddalac of trucks. See everything right now fits together perfectly no new barnds a Geo would be part of Chevy, end of story.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|