![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 230
|
Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
HONG KONG (MarketWatch) -- Nissan Motor Co. will cut the weight of its vehicles by an average of 15% over the next seven years as it seeks to improve fuel efficiency, according to reports.
short article here: http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...&dist=hplatest |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 4,128
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
YAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hopefully everyone else will follow or at least put it on the menu.
__________________
07' SS Monte |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CT
Drives: 2002 Chevy Impala
2008 Chevy Equinox
Posts: 747
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
I'd like to see how this pans out. I'm all for lighter cars. A lighter car translates into a quicker, better handling, more efficient car. But at the same time, the market demands more and more comfort features and safety innovations that all add weight. Sure, they can trim away some fat with vehicle design, but IMHO, the only way to get significant weight reductions is to make the car smaller, or use aluminum or alloys instead of steel. The problem with that is the cost. I wish the article giave a little more insight.
Any way to calculate how much a 15% weight reduction will increase fuel efficiency? I mean a 4000 lb car that loses 15% now becomes a 3400 lb car. I know that drag coefficient, engine efficiency, and gearing all come into play, but is there any crude calculation to see what the gains would be?
__________________
2002 Impala 2008 Equinox |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,859
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,231
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Im 100% behind this but the only way I see this happening is by
1. decontent the car " make A/C option pw pl " Renault has been doing this for quite sometime so I think that Nissan will go this way 2. using aluminum frames "LR will do it because they are a luxury SUV maker but I dont see Nissan been able to make and Altima it would make the car too expensive 3.making the cars smaller like in the past but IMO its not and easy task to get fuel efficiency out of todays cars because all of the electronics and safety features cars are mandated to have
__________________
Quote:
Hungry ,eat your import Last edited by 1931Chevy : 01-01-2008 at 11:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,666
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Quote:
1. Use a turbo 4 cylinder engine instead of a V-6. 2. Use non-steel material for hoods, trunk lids and roofs. 3. Don't use a full-sized spare tire. 4. Make alloy rims standard. Use magnesium instead of aluminum. 5. Use thinner gauge steel on non-safety critical parts. 6. Improve design. For example, use a single piece interior door molding instead of screwing together several pieces. In the seats, use memory foam instead of metal coil springs. Or use a single HID headlamp unit instead of multiple halogen bulbs. 7. Use fiber optics instead of copper wires. 8. Improve the CAD of the frame to eliminate material where it does not add to the strength of the frame. 9. Offer manual transmissions in all models. 10 Switch to a single, larger diameter exhaust rather than dual exhaust pipes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,859
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Quote:
And depending on the output, turbo 4 cylinders don't save much weight. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tha D.M.V.
Drives: 1992 Supra Turbo
Posts: 358
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Dropping 400-600lbs would be very noticeable. I also would like to know how Land Rover or anyone else is planning to drop %15 weight from their vehicles. I would be easier for Land Rover because they can pass on the costs with less market consequences than say what Chevy can do with the Malibu. My 2¢.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Waterville, OH
Drives: 2003 Nissan Maxima SE
Posts: 4,654
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Sounds good to me. Losing weight is good for cars in many ways.
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own. Current: Super Black 2003 Nissan Maxima SE Former: Brilliant Blue Metallic 1995 Ford Explorer XLT 4WD |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | ||
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,231
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Quote:
Im and Engineer a Civil Engineer but at the time I wrote the quote I was not even thinking from last night Happy 08, but yes yours are good ideas, all this could be done right now but the thing here is the price, how much is the consumer willing to pay and how much will the manufacturers make
__________________
Quote:
Hungry ,eat your import |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||||
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Drives: The bailout pkg
Posts: 2,396
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Report: Nissan Targeting 15% Reduction in Vehicle Weight for 10% Improvement in Fuel Consumption .http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007...an-t.html#more Quote:
__________________
" 123" " 1-2-3, oh, that's how elementary it's gonna be -" "There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning." --Warren Buffet, June 2008 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Old Miltia
Posts: 5,977
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
cutting weight means? less safety? less features?
just because they can cut weight by making them out of cotton candy, doesn't mean they should
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) (")_(") Down with the Anti-Smokers Nazis! Member of The: I will never buy an imported car in my life Club. Member of The: I will never buy a locally built foreign car in my life Club. Member of The: I only buy American cars that are built in America Club. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Drives: 1996 Dodge 3500 CTD 4x4
1992 Camaro RS 305
Posts: 3,303
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
Totally agree, there was a thread a while back that was about reducing weight in cars for fuel efficiency and related it to severe injury and fatality statistics, but I cant find it. I am for better efficiency, but not at the cost of saftey, all the "green" people who are for massive fuel economy usually dont think about this weight and efficiency as related to saftey, and if they do their only argument is to use carbon fiber and magneseum instead of steel and aluminum! And if you are cutting your weight by 15%, that is a huge amount, it would be a huge feat to cut that much weight and keep it safe. This just dosent seem like a safe way to do things!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,009
|
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency
I think dropping the weight of vehicles should be a major goal of all automakers - there are so many benefits.
While I agree that dropping weight usually costs more, I don't agree that it has to negatively impact safety. One good example would be to use forged aluminum wheels instead of cast aluminum. Forged parts are usually both lighter and stronger. Lighter wheel assemblies have so many advantages - better handling, ride, braking, and MPG. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|