GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Other Brands Discussion > Asian Competition
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2008, 09:42 PM   #1 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 230
Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) -- Nissan Motor Co. will cut the weight of its vehicles by an average of 15% over the next seven years as it seeks to improve fuel efficiency, according to reports.

short article here: http://www.marketwatch.com/news/stor...&dist=hplatest
Smellhound is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-01-2008, 10:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
big swede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 4,128
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

YAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hopefully everyone else will follow or at least put it on the menu.
__________________
07' SS Monte
big swede is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
impala02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CT
Drives: 2002 Chevy Impala 2008 Chevy Equinox
Posts: 747
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

I'd like to see how this pans out. I'm all for lighter cars. A lighter car translates into a quicker, better handling, more efficient car. But at the same time, the market demands more and more comfort features and safety innovations that all add weight. Sure, they can trim away some fat with vehicle design, but IMHO, the only way to get significant weight reductions is to make the car smaller, or use aluminum or alloys instead of steel. The problem with that is the cost. I wish the article giave a little more insight.

Any way to calculate how much a 15% weight reduction will increase fuel efficiency? I mean a 4000 lb car that loses 15% now becomes a 3400 lb car. I know that drag coefficient, engine efficiency, and gearing all come into play, but is there any crude calculation to see what the gains would be?
__________________

2002 Impala
2008 Equinox
impala02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
Xenon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,859
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by big swede View Post
YAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hopefully everyone else will follow or at least put it on the menu.
Land Rover, believe it or not, intends th lop off that much , if not more in the next Range Rover.


Finally a manufacturer that has seen the light.
Xenon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:33 PM   #5 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
Xenon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,859
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by impala02 View Post
I'd like to see how this pans out. I'm all for lighter cars. A lighter car translates into a quicker, better handling, more efficient car. But at the same time, the market demands more and more comfort features and safety innovations that all add weight. Sure, they can trim away some fat with vehicle design, but IMHO, the only way to get significant weight reductions is to make the car smaller, or use aluminum or alloys instead of steel. The problem with that is the cost. I wish the article giave a little more insight.

Any way to calculate how much a 15% weight reduction will increase fuel efficiency? I mean a 4000 lb car that loses 15% now becomes a 3400 lb car. I know that drag coefficient, engine efficiency, and gearing all come into play, but is there any crude calculation to see what the gains would be?
For every 100 lbs you lose you lose .1 seconds on the quarter mile(In general speak). Unless you are a really good driver, or the car itself tends to give consistent times, the difference wont be too noticeable. 0-60 is a bit tougher to say though.
Xenon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
1931Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,231
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Im 100% behind this but the only way I see this happening is by

1. decontent the car " make A/C option pw pl " Renault has been doing this for quite sometime so I think that Nissan will go this way
2. using aluminum frames "LR will do it because they are a luxury SUV maker but I dont see Nissan been able to make and Altima it would make the car too expensive
3.making the cars smaller like in the past

but IMO its not and easy task to get fuel efficiency out of todays cars because all of the electronics and safety features cars are mandated to have
__________________
Quote:
By Mark Fields
"Perform or the bank will own us"
Buying GM cars since 1931
Hungry ,eat your import

Last edited by 1931Chevy : 01-01-2008 at 11:05 PM.
1931Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,666
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1931Chevy View Post
Im 100% behind this but the only way I see this happening is by

1. decontent the car " make A/C option pw pl " Renault has been doing this for quite sometime so I think that Nissan will go this way
2. using aluminum frames "LR will do it because they are a luxury SUV maker but I dont see Nissan been able to make and Altima it would make the car too expensive
3.making the cars smaller like in the past
Well it's a good thing your not an engineer, because there are plenty more ways to reduce weight:

1. Use a turbo 4 cylinder engine instead of a V-6.
2. Use non-steel material for hoods, trunk lids and roofs.
3. Don't use a full-sized spare tire.
4. Make alloy rims standard. Use magnesium instead of aluminum.
5. Use thinner gauge steel on non-safety critical parts.
6. Improve design. For example, use a single piece interior door molding instead of screwing together several pieces. In the seats, use memory foam instead of metal coil springs. Or use a single HID headlamp unit instead of multiple halogen bulbs.
7. Use fiber optics instead of copper wires.
8. Improve the CAD of the frame to eliminate material where it does not add to the strength of the frame.
9. Offer manual transmissions in all models.
10 Switch to a single, larger diameter exhaust rather than dual exhaust pipes.
HoosierRon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
Xenon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,859
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierRon View Post
Well it's a good thing your not an engineer, because there are plenty more ways to reduce weight:

1. Use a turbo 4 cylinder engine instead of a V-6.
2. Use non-steel material for hoods, trunk lids and roofs.
3. Don't use a full-sized spare tire.
4. Make alloy rims standard. Use magnesium instead of aluminum.
5. Use thinner gauge steel on non-safety critical parts.
6. Improve design. For example, use a single piece interior door molding instead of screwing together several pieces. In the seats, use memory foam instead of metal coil springs. Or use a single HID headlamp unit instead of multiple halogen bulbs.
7. Use fiber optics instead of copper wires.
8. Improve the CAD of the frame to eliminate material where it does not add to the strength of the frame.
9. Offer manual transmissions in all models.
10 Switch to a single, larger diameter exhaust rather than dual exhaust pipes.
And you haven't even looked into using lighter drivetrain parts, lighter interior materials, and engine components.

And depending on the output, turbo 4 cylinders don't save much weight.
__________________

Xenon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
supraracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tha D.M.V.
Drives: 1992 Supra Turbo
Posts: 358
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenon View Post
For every 100 lbs you lose you lose .1 seconds on the quarter mile(In general speak). Unless you are a really good driver, or the car itself tends to give consistent times, the difference wont be too noticeable. 0-60 is a bit tougher to say though.
Dropping 400-600lbs would be very noticeable. I also would like to know how Land Rover or anyone else is planning to drop %15 weight from their vehicles. I would be easier for Land Rover because they can pass on the costs with less market consequences than say what Chevy can do with the Malibu. My 2¢.
supraracer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:39 PM   #10 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
BrickTamland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Waterville, OH
Drives: 2003 Nissan Maxima SE
Posts: 4,654
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Sounds good to me. Losing weight is good for cars in many ways.
__________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own.
Current: Super Black 2003 Nissan Maxima SE
Former: Brilliant Blue Metallic 1995 Ford Explorer XLT 4WD
BrickTamland is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 12:46 AM   #11 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
1931Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,231
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierRon View Post
Well it's a good thing your not an engineer, because there are plenty more ways to reduce weight:

1. Use a turbo 4 cylinder engine instead of a V-6.
2. Use non-steel material for hoods, trunk lids and roofs.
3. Don't use a full-sized spare tire.
4. Make alloy rims standard. Use magnesium instead of aluminum.
5. Use thinner gauge steel on non-safety critical parts.
6. Improve design. For example, use a single piece interior door molding instead of screwing together several pieces. In the seats, use memory foam instead of metal coil springs. Or use a single HID headlamp unit instead of multiple halogen bulbs.
7. Use fiber optics instead of copper wires.
8. Improve the CAD of the frame to eliminate material where it does not add to the strength of the frame.
9. Offer manual transmissions in all models.
10 Switch to a single, larger diameter exhaust rather than dual exhaust pipes.
Im and Engineer a Civil Engineerbut at the time I wrote the quote I was not even thinking from last night Happy 08, but yes yours are good ideas, all this could be done right now but the thing here is the price, how much is the consumer willing to pay and how much will the manufacturers make
__________________
Quote:
By Mark Fields
"Perform or the bank will own us"
Buying GM cars since 1931
Hungry ,eat your import
1931Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 09:22 AM   #12 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
AMERICA 123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Drives: The bailout pkg
Posts: 2,396
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by impala02 View Post
I'd like to see how this pans out. I'm all for lighter cars. A lighter car translates into a quicker, better handling, more efficient car.
Yep - can also be a whole lot more enjoyable as a result .
Quote:
But at the same time, the market demands more and more comfort features and safety innovations that all add weight.< and 'room' sometimes> Sure, they can trim away some fat with vehicle design, but IMHO, the only way to get significant weight reductions is to make the car smaller, or use aluminum or alloys instead of steel. The problem with that is the cost. I wish the article gave a little more insight.
Don't forget 'better' or 'more efficient' design as well .

Quote:
Any way to calculate how much a 15% weight reduction will increase fuel efficiency? I mean a 4000 lb car that loses 15% now becomes a 3400 lb car. I know that drag coefficient, engine efficiency, and gearing all come into play, but is there any crude calculation to see what the gains would be?
Yes there are several . Here is one from a slightly more detailed article covering the same announcement .

Report: Nissan Targeting 15% Reduction in Vehicle Weight for 10% Improvement in Fuel Consumption

.http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007...an-t.html#more

Quote:
According to the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, a 100kg reduction in the weight of a 1- to 1.5-ton car improves mileage by 1 km per liter.
__________________
" 123"
" 1-2-3, oh, that's how elementary it's gonna be -"

"There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning." --Warren Buffet, June 2008
AMERICA 123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 10:55 AM   #13 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Butz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Old Miltia
Posts: 5,977
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

cutting weight means? less safety? less features?

just because they can cut weight by making them out of cotton candy, doesn't mean they should
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Down with the Anti-Smokers Nazis!
Member of The: I will never buy an imported car in my life Club.
Member of The: I will never buy a locally built foreign car in my life Club.
Member of The: I only buy American cars that are built in America Club.
Quote:
If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year killing everyone inside.
—Robert Cringely
Butz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 11:21 AM   #14 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
ctaylorzl1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Drives: 1996 Dodge 3500 CTD 4x4 1992 Camaro RS 305
Posts: 3,303
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butz View Post
cutting weight means? less safety? less features?

just because they can cut weight by making them out of cotton candy, doesn't mean they should
Totally agree, there was a thread a while back that was about reducing weight in cars for fuel efficiency and related it to severe injury and fatality statistics, but I cant find it. I am for better efficiency, but not at the cost of saftey, all the "green" people who are for massive fuel economy usually dont think about this weight and efficiency as related to saftey, and if they do their only argument is to use carbon fiber and magneseum instead of steel and aluminum! And if you are cutting your weight by 15%, that is a huge amount, it would be a huge feat to cut that much weight and keep it safe. This just dosent seem like a safe way to do things!
__________________
ctaylorzl1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 11:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,009
Re: Nissan to cut vehicle weight by 15% to lift fuel efficiency

I think dropping the weight of vehicles should be a major goal of all automakers - there are so many benefits.

While I agree that dropping weight usually costs more, I don't agree that it has to negatively impact safety. One good example would be to use forged aluminum wheels instead of cast aluminum. Forged parts are usually both lighter and stronger. Lighter wheel assemblies have so many advantages - better handling, ride, braking, and MPG.
minnfang is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Other Brands Discussion > Asian Competition



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.