![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS3 V8
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,277
|
little hot smoke for the Tata Nano
French article from LeBlogauto
http://www.leblogauto.com/2009/10/co...-nano-feu.html it seems then a short-circuit problem caused some fires in some Tata Nanos |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Auckland City
Posts: 488
|
Re: little hot smoke for the Tata Nano
Quote:
__________________
"You can't sacrifice future product for short-term finanical gains. That's like a farmer eating his seed potatoes instead of planting them." - Bob Lutz. ![]() Add me one Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/MatthewJones93?ref=profile |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Belmont Hgts., CA
Drives: 98 Cadillac STS
09 Avalanche/CLS (Bus)
Posts: 2,425
|
Re: little hot smoke for the Tata Nano
Too bad, if it were here in the West we'd just buy another one! They are cheap enough!
__________________
Anticipating Movie: Anything in Blu-Ray --my new Favorites Star Trek Movie 2009 and Quantum of Solace"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Athens, GA
Drives: 1994 Volvo 940 Turbo
Posts: 841
|
Re: little hot smoke for the Tata Nano
Hmm... a $4000 car with a design fault. I can't imagine why.
__________________
Gone but never forgotten: 1988 Ford Thunderbird Sport (my first car) 1992 Mercury Sable GS (Grandpa's last car) 2004 Honda Accord LX 2007 Hyundai Sonata Eric
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South of the Cities, Minnesota
Drives: In Sept. 2010, hopefully an Aveo or Vibe
Posts: 131
|
Re: little hot smoke for the Tata Nano
How could you have gotten something so simple wrong? $4K for a car with a sub 1 liter motor, a manual transmission, and NOTHING ELSE. Something tells me they wouldnt do well at all in America, mainly because such a simple car can have such a bad flaw when theres barely any electronics in it. We already had something like that. We called it the Ford Pinto, but it wasnt the elecs, it was the gas tank.
Too bad for Tata.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS3 V8
Join Date: Dec 2005
Drives: 1988 Buick LeSabre(4dr) Goes by the name Katherine
Posts: 3,482
|
Re: little hot smoke for the Tata Nano
This car is a roving piece of junk.
obviously cheaply built & sold. I rather ride a bicycle or take public transportation! !!!!!
__________________
If GM had some balls, they'd revoke the death/phasing out of Pontiac.
|
|
|
|