![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In front of my computer
Drives: 2006 HHR
2002 Corolla-Before I saw the light
Posts: 8,058
|
Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
http://www.thecarconnection.com/Auto...173.A9529.html
The U.S. Big Three closed the gap with the Japanese vehicles on initial vehicle quality Infiniti QX56 SUV the least reliable. The magazine relies for its rankings on reports from readers, as well as its own testers, with a record one million questionnaires received back for the new issue, compared to 675,000 a year ago.
__________________
Before Understanding comes Faith "Legislatures represent people, not acres or trees"-Earl Warren |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Starship Enterpise
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17,211
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
I can see at least 5 people on this board who are going to jump on this thread and refute the claims.
__________________
The moderation here gets an F for FAILURE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: In front of my computer
Drives: 2006 HHR
2002 Corolla-Before I saw the light
Posts: 8,058
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
me too
__________________
Before Understanding comes Faith "Legislatures represent people, not acres or trees"-Earl Warren |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Level I Members
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2003 Toyota Tundra 4x4 Limited
Posts: 1,509
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
You said this
The U.S. Big Three closed the gap with the Japanese vehicles on initial vehicle quality, BUt, you forgot to mention this. but the Japanese brands still led significantly in in durability from 2-8 years but whatever. most people disclaim consumer reports anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 594
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
Quote:
Wait wait, didn't most of you GM fans dismiss and flame CR for the latest report it released because GM didn't do so well? Yet now, you use CR ratings in initial quality because they show domestic makers in a good light? Hypocrites. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 7,501
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
Of course they are ahead in 8 year quality, those tests are including 1998 Cutlasses and Luminas. Domestic vehicles are in a totally different place right now.
In any case, most quality reports are stupid and pointless.
__________________
![]() God Bless the Blue Bullet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Level I Members
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maryland
Drives: 2002 Pontiac Grand Am GT1
Posts: 2,863
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
Quote:
__________________
![]() Considering GM Again??? No. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am GT1 1992 Honda Accord EX Sedan Tough times are ahead. A brand new car is not in the cards. My new (to me) 16 year old Accord serves the purpose extremely well. And it's paid off! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada :)
Drives: '06 G5
Posts: 1,648
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
I think that the Big Three had bad duarability during the 90's, so their quality ratings will definatly be down. They say that they have changed, so we got to wait 5 years to see what happens
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 7,501
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
Quote:
__________________
![]() God Bless the Blue Bullet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP
2009 Ford Focus SEL
Posts: 15,046
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Westerville Ohio
Drives: 02 Camaro SS
94 Caprice 9C1
Posts: 3,030
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE
Posts: 6,667
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
Quote:
Just look at their reviews of cars. They only get most of the opinions from their readers( who are mainly Import people BTW) . who already buy in to their BS.
__________________
Last edited by 327 : 10-28-2005 at 07:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,979
|
Re: Big Three, Japanese Brands "Equal" on Initial Quality
who cares anymore, the import freaks deny it, the domestic freaks try to prove otherwise, then arguing begins. I've seen it so many times it's not even funny. My view on this is buy whatever the hell you want, if you think domestics are huge pieces of crap on wheels then #1, you're out of your mind and #2 go buy your import and I hope it ends up being a huge pile so you'll realize that you'll even get a lemon in your so perfect Camry. Quality in cars today is about even in every brand and don't rule out the fact that you might have an occasional problem but that's what warranty's for or you might get a lemon, stuff happens.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|