GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > GM Truck Talk
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2008, 07:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
 
tony1021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Drives: 04' Silverdo Ext. Cab 4WD Duramax LLY
Posts: 83
Suburban or Expedition

Have a buddy that is looking at purchasing one of these soon. He was showing me that he was interested in a Expedition Limited and the Suburban Z-71. While he was showing me both of these suv's I realized how much more expensive the suburban is over the expedition talking close to 10,000. Thats a whole lot of money. That aside we realized that you the expedition does not offer a limited slip or locking diff. so how does that rear end work? Also, the expedition offers a 6spd and chevy still offering that 4spd, any news when they will be offering the 6spd been 2 years now? However, i found this hard to believe but with the 4spd the burb still gets 14 city epa to the expidition 12. Probably be able to pull a 15 city 21 hwy with a 6spd.
tony1021 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-21-2008, 08:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
likearock00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NC
Drives: 2006 Chevy Silverado Crew Cab Z-71
Posts: 7,891
Re: Suburban or Expedition

I really find it hard to believe that the difference between the 2 is 10k. Anyway, what is he planning on doing with it? There are pros and cons to both of them, so it would help a little if we knew what he wanted to use it for.
__________________
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. -Thomas Jefferson
likearock00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 08:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Strapping.Young.Lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Drives: 1982 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4x4 Diesel W/ 4" Lift kit
Posts: 6,893
Re: Suburban or Expedition

The Expedition is smaller than the suburban

The Expedition EL/Max is the same size.
__________________

1982 GMC Sierra 2500
4x4, 6.2L Detroit Diesel. Dana 44 Front end, GM 14B Semi Floater Rear, Lifted 4", 33" BFG Mud Terrains

It Eats Tundras, Titans and Ridgelines for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner.

Formerly Known As: FordRules
Strapping.Young.Lad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 08:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
King Riffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fond Du Lac, WI
Drives: 2004 Ford Taurus SES sedan.
Posts: 3,244
Re: Suburban or Expedition

You can find used Excursions cheap.


Heck, if I didn't have certain standards for gas mileage, handling, and practicality I'd be buying one tomorrow.
__________________
King Riffle is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 09:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
rhvfd10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Douglas County, NV & UC Davis, CA
Drives: 98 Chevy C1500 4.3 V6
Posts: 1,918
Re: Suburban or Expedition

As the above have said, a Tahoe - Expedition compare would make more sense. Also He could do an Expedition EL - used Excursion - Suburban comapro
__________________
http://www.xkcd.com/386/

Remember Pearl Harbor!
rhvfd10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 09:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 5,493
Re: Suburban or Expedition

$10k difference? Are you sure? That seems like a lot...
__________________


Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM.
Current Cars:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4
2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6
1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6
Former Cars:
1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles)
1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles)
Future Car:
2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L DI VVT V6
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 09:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
chakis24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Drives: 2005 chevy silverado 1500 5.3 EC LB Z-71
Posts: 3,251
Re: Suburban or Expedition

tahoe/expedition is better comparo. expo has one plus that i can think of, and thats the fold flat third seat. the gm's dont have that since they have a live rear axle. but for hauling and towing, solid axle would be a better bet IMO.

and then if he does the tahoe, theres the hybrid too.
__________________
2005 Chevy Silverado 1500 5.3 Z-71 EC LB
3" P.A. Body lift, 305/70/17 Nitto Terra Grapplers, 17x9 Pro Comp Extreme Alloy Wheels, Halo Projector headlights w/ HID conversion and LEDs, halo projector fog lights, Pace Edwards tonneau cover, Fire and Ice LED light bar, "Patriot" back window decal, JDM black chrome bumper lights w/ LED, Putco Crhome handle covers, Billet-grille emblem, iPOD jack...
chakis24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 09:56 PM   #8 (permalink)
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
 
tony1021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Drives: 04' Silverdo Ext. Cab 4WD Duramax LLY
Posts: 83
Re: Suburban or Expedition

Quote:
Originally Posted by likearock00 View Post
I really find it hard to believe that the difference between the 2 is 10k. Anyway, what is he planning on doing with it? There are pros and cons to both of them, so it would help a little if we knew what he wanted to use it for.
im sorry that was my mistake, just so happens that all the expeditions in miami are priced around 41-44 sticker where as when you do an inventory search for an ltz burb everyone has them fully loaded 50-56.

He is comparing the expedition el to the burb and funny enough he is trading in his excursion. Diesel is way too expensive.
tony1021 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 10:01 PM   #9 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
F14CRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 4,604
Re: Suburban or Expedition

The Excursion could be had with a Power Stroke turbo diesel which would be my choice in a large SUV. The later 6.0L has more power and the 5 speed auto though some people will say they weren't quite as reliable as the 7.3L
__________________
'07 Subaru Forester: Manual trans, shifts assisted by Momo

'89 Buick Reatta: "Project GS"...3800 SII S/C, 6 speed manual...coming eventually

'94 Buick Century wagon: 3100 V6, business vehicle

Quote:
by MCGARRETT: It's not like Roger Smith and his croonies sat around on the 14th floor lighting cigars with $100 bills and ashing on babies saying " hey, lets loose a sh**load of market share and money, and lets make our big cars so small that no one will want one, ahahahahahahahaha !"
F14CRAZY is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 10:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,055
Re: Suburban or Expedition

Is that true? The Expy only gets 12 compared to Suburbans 15 mpg. I thought they were maybe 1 mpg diff.

Anyway, the fold flat third row is perfect for those who don't always need a larger EL version and lowered with a button as well. Try taking a 3rd row out of an SUV without a hernia. The IRS should be much better as well, even when towing. That is a myth by mostly non-IRS fans I think. Besides, the Expy tows more anyway.
__________________
"The Lincoln MKS has an exceptional exterior. Not good but exceptional."
-Gm786
blank disk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 10:50 PM   #11 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
F14CRAZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 4,604
Re: Suburban or Expedition

Would the 3/4 ton Suburban tow more than the Expy?
__________________
'07 Subaru Forester: Manual trans, shifts assisted by Momo

'89 Buick Reatta: "Project GS"...3800 SII S/C, 6 speed manual...coming eventually

'94 Buick Century wagon: 3100 V6, business vehicle

Quote:
by MCGARRETT: It's not like Roger Smith and his croonies sat around on the 14th floor lighting cigars with $100 bills and ashing on babies saying " hey, lets loose a sh**load of market share and money, and lets make our big cars so small that no one will want one, ahahahahahahahaha !"
F14CRAZY is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2008, 10:51 PM   #12 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Drives: 2007 GMC Canyon CrewCab 4x4 Z71
Posts: 574
Re: Suburban or Expedition

If he wants to pick up something that is "fully loaded" then he should check out the Yukon Denali XL.
__________________
The fastest way to kill a thread is a direct injection of verifiable facts.
GMCdriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 12:57 AM   #13 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
ctaylorzl1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indiana
Drives: 1996 Dodge 3500 CTD 4x4 1992 Camaro RS 305
Posts: 3,303
Re: Suburban or Expedition

There is a reason the Surburban costs more! The only real reason to get a Ford SUV is to get a diesel Excursion, and a 7.3 at that. And since they havent made the 7.3 since 03 then I wouldnt even concider it! So between the two I would DEFFINATLY go with the Suburban Z-71! Unless it happens to be a with nice low mileage and the 7.3 Powerstroke. I would NEVER buy a Expedition, Excursion mabey, but Suburban deffinatly!
__________________
ctaylorzl1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 03:21 PM   #14 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
cc1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 436
Re: Suburban or Expedition

I had 2 Excursions with the 7.3 00 & 02 then a 05' with the 6.0. The 7.3s were a lot better on fuel than the 6.0. My 7.3s got 16-20mpg then came the 6.0 that was doing good to get 16 on the hyway avg was only 14-15 the same as my 07 Suburban. I like the fold flat seats in the Expy ELs too. The LTZ is the Top of the line Suburban and a Z71 like mine can be loaded out pretty close in price to the LTZs, you just can't get the 6.0L in the Z71. I went with the Z anyway just because I really like the looks of the new body style Z71s. There is no way there is 10k differnce if comparing apples to apples in the way they are equipped. I have seen Epys sticker over 50k, I have also seen suburbans that sticker in the low 40s too. Personally I like the Lincoln version of the Xpy El the best of the fords, but I chose the Chevy, because it had the best residual value, since I typically lease this type of vehicle.
cc1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2008, 03:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Janesville
Posts: 138
Re: Suburban or Expedition

SUburban.
drees1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > GM Truck Talk



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.