GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Cadillac and Buick Discussion
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2005, 09:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
86fleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Drives: 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Posts: 3,470
Sat in a DTS today!

Since today was a half-day at school I went to the mall. Anyway, the nearby Cadillac/Infinity dealer displays cars in the middle of the mall. Usally they're locked, but today there was actually someone from the dealership, and he was letting people sit in the interior.
Here's what I thought:
First off, truly looks better in real life than in the photos, despite the fact that it was in a light gold color. (my least favorite) Second, The rear end looks nice, and though I see what people mean when they say it looks like a 1990 New Yorker, In person it looks way more Cadillac.
The car looks bigger than the Deville for some reason, though I think they are the same size. Of course, there's nothing wrong with that.
There's obviously a lot of room inside, and the seats were very comfortable. By the way, it had a bench and colum shifter.
The dash fully lived up to my expectations, though I think they over did the texturing on the plastics. I think it was a luxury III package, so the use of real wood was nice, and if it wasn't, the fake wood sure had me fooled.
The keys weren't in so I couldn't use any of the electronics, but the dealer guy probaly wouldn't have let me mess around with them anyway.
Overall, I'm impressed. This car keeps everything I liked about the Deville, and fixed some of the things I didn't. However I don't have a lot of expeirence with the competion, though I also sat in a G35, but they're in a completly differnet class, so comparing them wouldn't be worth it.
__________________

1986 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham;
Without this car I could have been in to rice

But then again, all those cars have "fart burners" on them. That "fart burner" ads 5-10HP to your car ;some of those small Hondas can whip a Vett off the line. (from anti-rice.com)
So 115hp+10hp=430hp, at least in ricerland
86fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-28-2005, 11:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
AdmiralViscen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 7,501
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

What was the door/dash gap like?
__________________

God Bless the Blue Bullet.
AdmiralViscen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2005, 07:37 PM   #3 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
86fleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Drives: 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Posts: 3,470
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralViscen
What was the door/dash gap like?
Better than the dealer picture that was on here. About the size of the one on my aunt's Acura.
__________________

1986 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham;
Without this car I could have been in to rice

But then again, all those cars have "fart burners" on them. That "fart burner" ads 5-10HP to your car ;some of those small Hondas can whip a Vett off the line. (from anti-rice.com)
So 115hp+10hp=430hp, at least in ricerland
86fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2005, 08:15 PM   #4 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
gerardo_zg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Monterrey, Mexico
Posts: 1,508
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

No pics ?
__________________


gerardo_zg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2005, 08:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
CRBoyd91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Houston, TX (Katy Area)
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GT
Posts: 3,941
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 86fleet
Better than the dealer picture that was on here. About the size of the one on my aunt's Acura.
Well that's really something!
CRBoyd91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2005, 09:09 PM   #6 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
86fleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Drives: 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Posts: 3,470
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by gerardo_zg
No pics ?
I didn't have a camera, there was a line, and the guy from the dealer didn't like the fact that there was a 15 year-old kid with only 1/100 of the base price taking up possible costumers' time.
__________________

1986 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham;
Without this car I could have been in to rice

But then again, all those cars have "fart burners" on them. That "fart burner" ads 5-10HP to your car ;some of those small Hondas can whip a Vett off the line. (from anti-rice.com)
So 115hp+10hp=430hp, at least in ricerland
86fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 07:53 AM   #7 (permalink)
jry
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
jry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: michigan, the incredible shrinking state
Drives: '08 Vette LT2, '09 Escape Hybrid, '07 Expy EL,
Posts: 1,397
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

after comparing the rear of the old and new dts i have decided that the old one is a bit too busy and cluttered but the new one is too sparse.
jry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 09:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
AMcA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,931
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 86fleet
. . . though I also sat in a G35, but they're in a completly differnet class, so comparing them wouldn't be worth it.
'86fleet, I take it you're 18? 19?

So I'm curious: when you say the G35 is in a completely different class, how do you see that class?

And when you answer, remember: you're speaking for your generation. No pressure here . . . .
AMcA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 10:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
86fleet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Drives: 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Posts: 3,470
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMcA
'86fleet, I take it you're 18? 19?

So I'm curious: when you say the G35 is in a completely different class, how do you see that class?

And when you answer, remember: you're speaking for your generation. No pressure here . . . .
It's not my favorite class, as I happen to like bigger cars, but I do like the G35. Speaking for my generation; there seems to be a lot of people who think import "luxury" sport-sedans are the greatest thing ever. But there is no shortage of young people who would rather have something bigger like an Impala SS (the 94-96)
__________________

1986 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham;
Without this car I could have been in to rice

But then again, all those cars have "fart burners" on them. That "fart burner" ads 5-10HP to your car ;some of those small Hondas can whip a Vett off the line. (from anti-rice.com)
So 115hp+10hp=430hp, at least in ricerland
86fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 05:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
MCGARRETT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,003
Re: Sat in a DTS today!

My local Cadillac dealership has at least 4 of them on the lot. I cruised by last night when I was bored and wanted to take a peek at the 2006 Cadillacs. They had 2 DTS "Performance Sedans" and one DTS "Luxury III" sedan. The seemed to have about the same trim, except that the performance sedan has 7 or 8 spoke CTS/STS style wheels, while the luxury DTS has big chrome 10 spoke wheels, both looked like they were 18 inchers, but I did not get down to check.

I sat in both the LuxIII and Performance DTS's, the interiors are very similar, I was impressed with the finish, though the headliner material felt a little rough, I would have rather they used a faux suede material like "Escaline". Neither of the sedans had the navigational system, they actuall did not have any extra "options" at all, but they were both really loaded...both had..

Intellibeam
Front and Rear Parking Assist
Power Tilt and Tele wheel
Massaging front buckets
Heated and Cooled seats
Memory
Tri-Zone A/C
Heated steering wheel
Power Lumbar Rear Seats
Heated rear seats
HID Lights
Heated Washer Fluid
etc..

The DTS LUXIII was about $48,000 and the Performance DTS was about $50,000.

The seats feel much more "padded" than the previous DeVille, and the headrests are much softer, they almost felt like a large leather pillow. The DTS still retains the "size" of the DTS which I really like, it feels very substantial, roomy and heavy, like a large safe older home, it may not be as modern as a new home, but it still has some great presence.

Fit and finish was quite nice, I was surprised to find a real lighter and ashtray in the fron console of the DTS, the trunk seemed large with a big wide opening. The rear seat still has alot of stretch out room, enough that I can cross one leg over another without having my shoe hit the front seat. I think Cadillac could have concentrated a little better on some of the details, the rear reading lights could look a little more classy, and while the tri-zone climate control is nice, the switches are way down on the bottom of the console. But overall, the DTS interior is quite nice, I personally would have to have the navigational system, the radio is nice, but I think that the dash looks more upscale with the navigation.

I personally am not sure if I like the font end as much as I do in photos, I really would have to study the car in a couple of different colors to see which one looks best. The 2 DTS's that I sat in were black and cashmere.
MCGARRETT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Cadillac and Buick Discussion



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.