![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Hills, CA
Drives: Toyota Corolla
Posts: 2,499
|
Question about the Regal
What the anus is this?
(sorry pic was too big so heres the link) link dont work no more, but it looked like a reverse convertible Last edited by LAChevy24 : 09-24-2005 at 04:29 AM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 843
|
Re: Question about the Regal
That was a while back, GM was actually toying with that idea. There was a thread on here some time ago where I mentioned this car. I was trying to propose the idea using this technology on the LaCrosse, or a new Epsilon Buick as a stop gap for the Velite. Kinda cool if you ask me.
__________________
2005 Chevrolet Malibu Maxx 1993 Oldsmobile Bravada GM, Then and Now... Before you go and buy a import brand car because of the perception of quality, do a little research and you will find GM has as good or better quality than most of those other brands. It's not cool to hate America people! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,003
|
Re: Question about the Regal
Buick Regal Cielo.
It had a big retractable roof, it would open kind of like the panoramic roof on the G6. It looked cool open but when it was closed it looked a little odd. Probably ditched because it was going to be tough to make it watertight and durable. It probably would have cost too much and taken a couple of years to develop, by then the Regal would have been in it's second to last year. Not worth it. It was a real "wow, thats pretty cool option" but there probably would have not been alot of takers. My guess is that it probably would have been about a $2000 option at least. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|