GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Cadillac and Buick Discussion
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2004, 11:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
LDB
Walking
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Drives: C6 Vette
Posts: 7
New STS not for those under 5'6"

My wife had every expectation of buying a new STS, but when she drove it, she could barely see over the steering wheel with the seat full up and the tilt steering wheel full down. She is 5'3", so not unusually short. After seeing my wife try to drive it, I can assure you that very few will be sold to people under 5'6". Nothing like cutting yourself out of a large segment of the market right from the get go. How could Cadillac make such a fundamental design error, particularly on a car that should presumably appeal to women, many of whom will be too short to drive it? If you can believe it, she can see much better out of my C6 Vette than she could out of the new STS.
LDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-19-2004, 12:41 PM   #2 (permalink)
LDB
Walking
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Drives: C6 Vette
Posts: 7
May be a bit of both. The cowl does seem higher than most, possibly due to the head up display, but the up/down seat travel seems small too. It's possible that the problem is the lower section of the dash, which seems to hang down pretty far, and thus may limit upward seat movement due to the need for crush zone knee room in a crash.
LDB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 12:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
2.5L Iron Duke
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 16
[quote=LDB]I can assure you that very few will be sold to people under 5'6". Nothing like cutting yourself out of a large segment of the market right from the get go. [/Q

they have been doing the same thing to those of us over 6' for years!
ness5575 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 12:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
GMI Mod/Camaro Fanatic
 
BigAls87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,545
Odd....I had a harder time seeing over the XLR hood then the STS's hood. I thought the STS's seats were too high. Im 6ft, but my head came close to the roof...
Hrm...oh well. If I had 60k and wanted a luxury sedan, STS would be the clear choice.
__________________

Any Inside Info? Questions or Coments? Ideas?
Email me at BigAl@GMInsidenews.com
1993 Caprice 9C1
1987 Camaro Z28
1972 Camaro RS
BigAls87Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 05:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
 
mgescuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 24,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by ness5575
Quote:
Originally Posted by LDB
I can assure you that very few will be sold to people under 5'6". Nothing like cutting yourself out of a large segment of the market right from the get go.
they have been doing the same thing to those of us over 6' for years!
Yeaaaah... 6'3" here!!! STS is actually very comfortable for me.
__________________


2000 Saab 9-5 Aero
1995 Mercedes C280
1994 Jaguar XJ6

...when all hope is gone, you know sad songs say so much...

My Vision of Cadillac
My Vision of Cadillac (REDUX)





mgescuro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 05:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
 
mgescuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 24,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigAls87Z28
Odd....I had a harder time seeing over the XLR hood then the STS's hood. I thought the STS's seats were too high. Im 6ft, but my head came close to the roof...
Hrm...oh well. If I had 60k and wanted a luxury sedan, STS would be the clear choice.
On teh XLR?? Really?? Being 6'3", i had acceptable headroom. And you can see the hood quite clearly, as the wheel flares mark the corners of the hood. I was actually pretty surprised, since I expected to see none of the hood at all!
__________________


2000 Saab 9-5 Aero
1995 Mercedes C280
1994 Jaguar XJ6

...when all hope is gone, you know sad songs say so much...

My Vision of Cadillac
My Vision of Cadillac (REDUX)





mgescuro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 08:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
AMcA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by LDB
May be a bit of both. The cowl does seem higher than most, possibly due to the head up display, but the up/down seat travel seems small too.
This is a great way for the domestics to differentiate themselves over the imports. I've always noticed that the imports, both Japanese and German seem to limit the extent of seat adjustment travel, while the Americans gave us tremendous adjustability. As a guy who likes his lower seat cushion tilted pretty far up while still set relatively low, I appreciated that in domestic cars. It was always a part of what made a Caddy a Caddy for me.

After all, what's more American than giving folks a serious lot of choice in everything, including seat sdjustments? Meanwhile, the Germans know that their engineers have selected the correct seating position, and no one ought to be allowed to mess with that. OK, you're Americans, so we'll grudgingly let you adjust your seat. A little bit. And the Japanese, they just copy the Germans.

If Cadillac is now limiting that adjustability, I can point to the culprit: the insidious practice of "benchmarking". BMW does it this way, and it's the market leader, so if we do it this way, that plenty good enough. It's a sure-fire way to make yourself number 2 in the market, while pissing away any distinctiveness in your product.

Come to think of it, on the CTS I rented earlier this year (and really liked - the equal of my old 540i in many ways) the lower cushion adjustment ran out of adjustment before I wanted it to. This is not a good sign.
AMcA is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Cadillac and Buick Discussion



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.