![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Drives: 2006 Chevy HHR
2008 VW Golf
Posts: 1,358
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
My prediction: sales for the calender year of 2010 will be very strong and will rival the SRX sales. Only time will tell but I think the CTS wagon will be more popular. It is coming off a successful platform and the CTS is already preceived as a very good vehicle. The SRX will have a lot of work to do to gain customer, albeit the SUV/CUV platform is more popular than a wagon platform (for whatever reason.) |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,039
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
__________________
Cadillac! GM's "Back to the Future" Division GM's Deja Vu Division Cadillac is a Car. Last edited by 2002 Caddy : 08-01-2009 at 01:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Belmont Hgts., CA
Drives: 98 Cadillac STS
09 Avalanche/CLS (Bus)
Posts: 2,418
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
I referenced something I read. Use the "Search Function" and type in Cadillac out of Europe and you will find some listings. When I did it minutes ago I came up with reference to an Auto News article dated 03/26/2009.
The information shouldn't be surprising as GM didn't design anything for the Euro market. The CTS is too big on the outside, doesn't have the right engine fuel choices (no diesel, gas hybrid) and the worse: Bad distribution channels! Marketing is your speciality, so you know what would be required an internet investigation will reveal that GM is doing in Europe what it does here, just produce and dump on the market (no market research or weighted necessity). ![]()
__________________
Anticipating Movie: Anything in Blu-Ray --my new Favorites Star Trek Movie 2009 and Quantum of Solace"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,450
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
I would believe Cadillac is headed in the correct direction by expanding their CTS model portfolio and focusing on profitable segments such as with their new SRX. I do not doubt your statement here, however have you seen any published numbers regarding Cadillac's profit margins by model or BMW or Mercedes-Benz or Lexus for comparison? I do not recall seeing profit numbers, just sales numbers for the luxury brands. I recall seeing articles talking about particular models being profitable for luxury brands such as the BMW 3 Series and Cadillac's Escalades and DTS, but I do not recall seeing any detail numbers. But again, all of these articles were before the severe drop in auto sales and the massive losses posted by all of the auto and luxury brands and prior to GM's bankruptcy. I would expect all of the previous losses GM Corp. are allocated to the old GM versus the new GM Company and same would apply to the Cadillac brand financial statements. In that the New GM Company is less than 90 day old, I would not expect any financial statements to be published until reviewed with new GM board first and then a public financial statement later. JLM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,039
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
The STS and SRX never even came close to selling at a unit profit level... these cars always sold at huge discounts, at bes,t a break even level... in short they did NOTHING to help pay for the development costs of the Sigma/Sigma II platform. The CTS bore the cost of Sigma pretty much all on its own... The wagon makes sense to GM bean counters but not to anyone who looks at what might actually sell... To the accountant, this car cost next to nothing to develop (low fixed cost) and will help spread the cost of sigma over another car that might sell. To the marketing guy this car is wacko. The market for Wagons in North America is minuscule. High end wagons even smaller. This will likely compete with the new (and very pretty) SRX (which will satisfy most of the same requirements as the wagon), except the SRX will be offered at a lower cost... My prediction, the new gorgeous SRX will do to the CTS wagon what the CTS sedan did to the STS.
__________________
Cadillac! GM's "Back to the Future" Division GM's Deja Vu Division Cadillac is a Car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,450
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
OK. But no published numbers to review? JLM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Drives: 2006 Chevy HHR
2008 VW Golf
Posts: 1,358
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
I would love to include some sort reward/punishment into the challenge. I don't know what that could be though, maybe some sort of statement in our signatures. Would you be up for that? It makes it a little more interesting and more personal when GM releases their sales number every month. Are you up for that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,450
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
I would agree with 2002 Caddy here, the SRX will far out sell the CTS Sport Wagon. It has little to do with your preference of one model or the other , but more the size of the luxury segment and the luxury station wagon segment is much smaller in the U. S. market than outside the states I suspect. JLM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,039
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
If you're right... I'll add "CalgaryHHR is better at product placement then me and LaNeve" to my sig... ![]()
__________________
Cadillac! GM's "Back to the Future" Division GM's Deja Vu Division Cadillac is a Car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Drives: 2006 Chevy HHR
2008 VW Golf
Posts: 1,358
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
Shall we consider sales in both Canada and the US or only the US alone. I know Canada is a much smaller market but I think it will really help my CTS wagon sales tally. I think we can start with looking at the simple unit volume. If I come up with a formula that will help me win I will share it with you ![]() Hopefully GM will supply sales volume for the CTS wagon and not just lump it in with CTS sedan sales. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,039
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
How about you add "2002 Caddy is right, we should have fired Rick, with cause, in 2004, 2005 and twice in 2007" Thats a little too long... I'll work on it.
__________________
Cadillac! GM's "Back to the Future" Division GM's Deja Vu Division Cadillac is a Car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,553
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Quote:
Cadillac lineup from carpages.co.uk
__________________
"The irony of the Information Age is that it has given new respectability to uninformed opinion" -- John Lawton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NC
Drives: 2004 DeVille
Posts: 742
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
Much as I like the way this CTS wagon looks, it's annoying to me that we're offered seriously compromised wagons like the late Magnum, Malibu Maxx, and this one, and then told that wagons don't sell in this country. Wonder why?
The CTS wagon has the same cramped rear head room as the sedan, and most of its additional luggage space is above the seatback. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,173
|
Re: CTS SportWagon
my guess is it will be less than $2k more than the sedan.
Caddy made a big mistake with the SRX in '04 when they priced it at $38,600 and the sedan was $31-32K. In mid '06 the price was dropped from $39,900 to $36,900. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|