![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Feb 2008
Drives: 2007 Cadillac DTS
Posts: 60
|
09 DTS and Lucerne
Anyone have more information about the refreshed 2009 DTS and Lucerne?
"Buick Lucerne: A minor refresh will occur on the 2009 Lucerne. This will include revising the exterior and an all-new interior. The engine lineup will also be revised to include only the 3.6L direct-injected HF V6 mated to a 6-speed automatic." "Cadillac DTS: Like it's Buick cousin, the DTS gets a slight revisit as well as the 3.6L direct-injected HF V6 and 6-speed automatic." From Future Product Guide. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Drives: 2006 Buick LaCrosse CXS; Black with Grey Interior
Posts: 1,806
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
If they are able to make the backseat a 60/40 split fold flat and not the current pass-through, that would go a long way in putting the Lucerne as a potential replacement for me.
Still holding out hope for a zeta Park Avenue in fall of 2012.
__________________
![]() Current Ride: 2006 Buick LaCrosse CXS (Black w/ Grey Leather Interior) Wife's Ride: 2005 Ford Freestyle SEL (Charcoal Grey/Silver w/Grey Leather Interior) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,863
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Umm... what?
Improvements to both models are pretty easy to imagine, and they amount to essentially updating them to fit the rest of their brand. The Cadillac would get new switchgear, a CTS-style grill, and hopefully fix the awful rear. The Buick would get the same improvements, and maybe some nicer detailing. The engine is a big improvement over either of their current powerplants (the 3800 and FWD Northstar), but I'm not sure how customers would feel about a V6 powered Cadillac flagship. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Chester, OH
Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS
Posts: 4,859
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
I thought the STS/DTS were being replaced by one large sports sedan?
__________________
Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM. Current Cars: 2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4 2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6 1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6 Former Cars: 1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles) 1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles) Future Car: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro LT RS: 3.6L DI VVT V6
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dimondale, MI
Drives: '89 Buick Reatta
Posts: 3,948
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Will the N* still be optional?
__________________
'07 Subaru Forester: my do-everything everyday driver and first new vehicle. Manual trans. 23k miles as of 3/19/08, 24,2xxk miles as of 3/30/08 '89 Buick Reatta: "Project GS"...3800 SII S/C, 6 speed manual '94 Buick Century wagon: 3100 V6, business vehicle Past: '92 and '93 Ford Explorers, '03 Mercury Mountaineer |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2005 CTS 3.6
Posts: 3,299
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
I would be very suprised to see any real updates for these "dead-cars-walking". Would GM spend precious money on 2 cars whos sales have been in steady decline and have only 2 years of life left to them?
__________________
"Oh, I'm sorry. I was looking for the GM fan site. This is obviously not it. I seem to have stumbled on to a site for Toyota lobbyists in Washington DC. Even GM's successes seem to be met here with jeers and condescention." - me |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Drives: 1996 Cavalier Z24, 2000 Blazer LT
Posts: 1,400
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
I'd be surprised the Northstar would be dropped also, even if just for the 10% that buy it and the name recognition. However, I could see this if it was some type of CAFE requirement. Would like to hear more info on it.
__________________
2000 Chevrolet Blazer LT -- 63000 miles 1996 Chevrolet Cavalier Z24 -- 160000 miles MEDIOCRITY: It takes a lot less time, and most people won't notice the difference until it's too late. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Del Mar/Rancho Santa Fe(San Diego),CA
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Posts: 729
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Quote:
I'm crossing my fingers for a RWD Flagship before 2012. It should be on it's own platform, but mst of us will settle with Zeta.
__________________
The best thing to do in a car, short of sex, is to go faster then everyone else on the road. Myspace... http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...endid=18815067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Del Mar/Rancho Santa Fe(San Diego),CA
Drives: 2000 Mustang GT
Posts: 729
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Quote:
It should be pumping 375, not 275.
__________________
The best thing to do in a car, short of sex, is to go faster then everyone else on the road. Myspace... http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...endid=18815067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2005 CTS 3.6
Posts: 3,299
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Quote:
Northstar is standard on the DTS, so I'd say the total was much more than 10%.
__________________
"Oh, I'm sorry. I was looking for the GM fan site. This is obviously not it. I seem to have stumbled on to a site for Toyota lobbyists in Washington DC. Even GM's successes seem to be met here with jeers and condescention." - me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2005 CTS 3.6
Posts: 3,299
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Well, a half-ton anyway. Calendar 2007 sales: DTS: 51,469. Down from 58,000 in 2006 Lucerne: 82,923. Down from 96,000 in 2006 January 2008: DTS: 2782. Down from 4095 Jan. 07. Lucerene: 4840. Down from 5759 Jan 07. Fleet sales are not seperated out in these figures, but I think they're fairly high for these 2. It's for this reason I doubt any real enhancements aside from color and/or trim until they cease production. New interiors or trim seldom if ever increase the sales of any vehicle. The SRX for example. I would also doubt that GM would spend the money required to put a 6 speed transmission in these cars. The people that buy them simply don't care about such things. Don't misunderstand my position. I'm very fond of both these cars, myself. I would love to see them both get more modern drivetrains and far nicer interiors. I just don't see it happening. Source: Automotive News Data Center.
__________________
"Oh, I'm sorry. I was looking for the GM fan site. This is obviously not it. I seem to have stumbled on to a site for Toyota lobbyists in Washington DC. Even GM's successes seem to be met here with jeers and condescention." - me Last edited by megeebee : 02-17-2008 at 03:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nebraska, USA
Drives: '94 Plymouth Voyager 3.0
Posts: 4,380
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Quote:
Though a 6 sp/DI'ed DTS Performance would get my blood pumping....... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Drives: Sitting on my PHEV Prius - aka KABOOM - near a bea
Posts: 1,588
|
Re: 09 DTS and Lucerne
Quote:
Some of these would be the following; 1.) Industry performance in general. 2.) More importantly, segment and competitor performance within the segments. 3.) Other nice to haves - fleet/retail,Brand, Brand segment, Corporate, - whats hot and whats not, etc. 4.) Trends in regards to all the above. **************************** A.) As a for instance, Calender year 2007 represented a -2.5% sized market compared to 2006. B.) Very important to note as far as JAN2008 and these two vehicles go; Luxury car sales were down -14.9% and the large car segment was down -26.5%. Total car sales were -2.3%, total light truck sales were down -6.1%, and total light vehicle sales were down -4.3%. C.) NOW lets consider some other nice to know stuff - like certain Toyota and Lexus numbers. 1.).................... DEC2007 AND CALENDER YEAR 2007 RESULTS. ----- CURRENT MONTH (DEC) - - CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE -- .....................DSR % DSR % ................... 2007.. 2006 CHG...... 2007.. 2006... CHG AVALON........ 5,694. 7,955 -28.4.. 72,945 88,938 -18.2 LS 460/600h L 3,257. 3,865 -15.7. 35,226 19,546... 79.6 GS 350......... 2,254.. 1,989. 13.3.. 21,314 23,665.. -10.2 GS 460/450h.... 325..... 299.. 8.7... 2,067.. 3,725.. -44.7 D.) Need to next look at the same group - AND a few others for JAN2008. .......................Jan-08// 2008 YTD ----- CURRENT MONTH//CALENDAR YEAR TO DATE -- ...............................................DSR %.. DSR % ...............................................200 8... 2007.... CHG ..................................AVALON. 4,155.. 6,529 -36.4 TOTAL TOYOTA DIV. PASS. CAR. 83,409... 86,682. -3.8 ...................................ES 350. 4,346..... 5,320 -18.3 .........................LS 460/600h L. 1,906..... 3,006 -36.6 ...................................GS 350. 1,270..... 1,368.. -7.2 ............................GS 460/450h... 210........ 183. 14.8 ...............................IS 250/350 3,262..... 3,395. -3.9 ........TOTAL LEXUS PASS. CAR.. 11,177... 13,574 -17.7 .....TOTAL TOYOTA PASS. CAR.. 94,586.. 100,256 -5.7 ............TOTAL TOYOTA DIV... 151,550.. 153,732 -1.4 .............................TOTAL LEXUS. 20,299.... 22,118 -8.2 .....................TOTAL TOYOTA 171,849.. 175,850 -2.3 .....................................(SELLING DAYS 25 25)
__________________
" 123" " 1-2-3, oh, that's how elementary it's gonna be -" For a look at what 'Extreme' Toyota really means: Access report at: http://www.nlcnet.org/article.php?id=562 Last edited by AMERICA 123 : 02-17-2008 at 07:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|