GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Pontiac & Saturn Discussion
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-29-2009, 02:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
Premium Member
 
zete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 5,304
GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Interestingly enough I just got a letter asking me to get the front suspension repaired under what looks like a recall, but probably is more like a "customer satisfaction campaign".

I talked to the dealer and they got a huge shipment of parts for this, so they can deal with the G8s that are affected. Here's the first paragraph.
We have learned that your 2009 model year Pontiac G8 may have a condition that we would like to repair before the extreme cold temperatures arrive. The sealing boots on the front suspension lower control arm ball joints may not seal correctly in extreme cold temperatures. The material of the boot may become rigid in cold temperatures and could allow contaminants to enter the boot. This could cause premature wear of the ball joint, which could result in a clunking or rattling noise when the vehicle is driven over rough roads, wheels out of alignment, and/or premature tire wear.
Of note is that this will be done at no charge only until Nov. 1st, 2009. So they really want those G8s in and fixed. I guess they finally found the problem with the clunking suspensions. And I guess "cold weather testing" in Australia didn't cut it .

This was from GM Canada. I wonder if a similar campaign is happening in the US? I hope this addresses some of the folks who had problems with their G8's front suspensions.
__________________


To appeal to enthusiasts GM needs to build on a flexible platform and be able to build small numbers and do it profitably. Hopefully we'll see some of that in the future with Alpha and Zeta, assuming the latter survives.
zete is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-29-2009, 03:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS3 V8
 
Hitman1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL
Drives: 2009 Pontiac G8 GT Sport Red Metallic
Posts: 3,613
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Have not got that in Alabama yet? Not sure if I will either based on climate.
__________________
Quote:
"Remembering other people's names is a sign of weakness. Yours is the only name that is important."

Duck Dodgers
Current Car: 2009 Pontiac G8 GT (Sport Metallic Red with Black Leather Interior)

Wife's CUV: 2009 Saturn Outlook XR (Silver Moss w/Tan Leather Interior)

Previous Car: 2006 Buick LaCrosse CXS (Black w/ Grey Leather Interior)

Wife's Previous CUV: 2005 Ford Freestyle SEL (Charcoal Grey/Silver w/Grey Leather Interior)
Hitman1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 04:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
Premium Member
 
zete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NCR, Great White North
Posts: 5,304
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitman1970 View Post
Have not got that in Alabama yet? Not sure if I will either based on climate.
You think they would do it. It's not like you couldn't decide to go on a skiiing trip up to New York State or go for some ice fishing in Minnesota. They might be starting up here and moving south as they get the parts.

The tech on the phone was funny: "Woah. They shipped a lot of parts. This new GM is awesome. No waiting for parts and explaining the delay to customers!" He was gobsmacked.

It's a 3.5 hour repair, so I'm figuring they're replacing the suspension pretty much. I'll ask when I go there early next week.
__________________


To appeal to enthusiasts GM needs to build on a flexible platform and be able to build small numbers and do it profitably. Hopefully we'll see some of that in the future with Alpha and Zeta, assuming the latter survives.
zete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 10:59 AM   #4 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
Premium Member
 
T-Type's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, IL.
Posts: 3,435
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

There's also talk that a recall on the lower control arms is coming too. GM should be putting out something shortly.

Lots of G8s have been having lots of trouble with the ball joints.
T-Type is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
Chevrolet VOLT
 
Neanderthal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Caveville, Neanderthallande: Have Club, Will Travel
Drives: 07 KIA Spectra. The Other Peninsula car.
Posts: 10,530
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Holy schmoley.

Gotta love those Chinese parts.



They're Australian?





Gotta love those hot-weather parts!!!
__________________
formerly LAMRONH

"I never heard a truly wise person call themself wise."--Rush caller, 03JUN09

"I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Evelyn Beatrice Hall, writing under the pseudonym of Stephen G Tallentyre in "The Friends of Voltaire" (1906)

"Can't...can't...can't...we all...just...get along?" --Rodney King

"Wake up, Amurrica!" --Earl Pitts, Amurrican
Neanderthal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 07:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
 
JT87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UOIT, Oshawa
Drives: '08 Cobalt SS/TC
Posts: 667
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Type View Post
Lots of G8s have been having lots of trouble with the ball joints.
That's the one drawback of casting the ball joint into the control arm.
__________________
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
JT87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 10:16 PM   #7 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
tom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,124
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by JT87 View Post
That's the one drawback of casting the ball joint into the control arm.
Oh my. One less part number for GM to worry about. One more headache for the future owners down the road when stuff starts wearing out.
tom3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 11:00 PM   #8 (permalink)
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
 
JT87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UOIT, Oshawa
Drives: '08 Cobalt SS/TC
Posts: 667
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom3 View Post
Oh my. One less part number for GM to worry about. One more headache for the future owners down the road when stuff starts wearing out.
Agreed. I'm pretty sure the suspension design on the front of the G8's is the same as the Camaro, meaning it has two ball joints on each of the front corners. There's no easy way to install a pair of ball joints and make them removable in a setup like this. However, they either need to make them more durable or find a creative solution.
__________________
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
JT87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2009, 11:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
 
caddycruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern Delaware
Drives: '09 G8 GT
Posts: 938
Re: GM Campaign on front suspension, lower control arm boots

Large scale, constant problem, much discussed and aggravating owners for some time. Like the strut bushings, only more so, causes a variety of front end issues from noises to shaking...and SO many have run into it. Some more than once.

It's a weird one, again because the home market Oz cars have had nothing appreciable happen despite using exactly the same parts down to the bone, and GM's only explanation thus far has been the cold & moisture. No letter yet here in Delaware and no front end noises after 11k miles here in Delaware, but weird shakes, and given that others including Jersey have been notified, I hope to see something soon.

Then we'll see how things go after all of these are inspected/replaced with parts that don't seem much or any different than those coming off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JT87 View Post
Agreed. I'm pretty sure the suspension design on the front of the G8's is the same as the Camaro, meaning it has two ball joints on each of the front corners. There's no easy way to install a pair of ball joints and make them removable in a setup like this. However, they either need to make them more durable or find a creative solution.
Home market Oz cars have had no such big scale occurrence of such an issue, despite identical parts and not nice roads, but also a lack of our winters. The Camaro has a lot of bits and designs that are unique, hence the essentially Zeta II, front end included--the jury is still out on what may crop up with that car, if anything. So far I've only read of front end clunks->strut bushings, on a few via forums.
__________________
Me: '08 G6 GT Coupe...lemon...'09 Malibu 2LT V6...traded...'09 G8 GT!
Mom: '08 Malibu 2LT 4-cyl
Dad: '96 Subaru Legacy Wagon, '93 Fleetwood Brougham
Brother: '86 Regal LTD
Full Album

Last edited by caddycruiser : 11-03-2009 at 11:23 PM.
caddycruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Discussion Area > Pontiac & Saturn Discussion



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.